

by doggies4eva » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:52 pm
by UK Fan » Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:24 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Hondo » Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:08 pm
UK Fan wrote:Infact Ill bet anyone the SANFL without any involvement in the AFL would survive twice as long as the AFL without any SA teams being involved in their comp.
by Barto » Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:01 am
by Wedgie » Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:52 am
Barto wrote:It's a crying shame the government didn't allow the licenced clubs to have pokies 15 years sooner, it'd be a completely different story.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by UK Fan » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:18 pm
hondo71 wrote:UK Fan wrote:Infact Ill bet anyone the SANFL without any involvement in the AFL would survive twice as long as the AFL without any SA teams being involved in their comp.
Do you have any idea what revenue from the AAMI Stadium's 22 AFL games generates for footy in this state? No AFL teams in SA = death of SANFL (in its current form).
You think the 10,000 people that go to the SANFL each week and the lucrative TV rights deal with the ABC would sustain it longer than the AFL?
How much are you willing to bet?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Hondo » Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:36 pm
UK Fan wrote:If I could get you to maybe read the title of the thread which reads "SANFL super league". Clearly Indicating not the SANFL in its current form.
UK Fan wrote:Approx 10000 fans to see 4 SANFL games (salary cap $350K per club usually 8 teams competing) $2.8 mill worth of footballers wages/assets on the field.
Compared to an average of 30000 crowds for the AwFuL per week in SA. (20000 Port and 40000 crows). With a total of over $16 mill worth of footballers wages/assets on field.
by baysman » Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:49 pm
by UK Fan » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:50 pm
hondo71 wrote:UK Fan wrote:If I could get you to maybe read the title of the thread which reads "SANFL super league". Clearly Indicating not the SANFL in its current form.
Does it?UK Fan wrote:Approx 10000 fans to see 4 SANFL games (salary cap $350K per club usually 8 teams competing) $2.8 mill worth of footballers wages/assets on the field.
Compared to an average of 30000 crowds for the AwFuL per week in SA. (20000 Port and 40000 crows). With a total of over $16 mill worth of footballers wages/assets on field.
Compared to $25m+ revenue of an AFL team v $1-3m of an SANFL team.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Hondo » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:42 pm
UK Fan wrote:So each AFl team in SA makes $25m+ in revenue. And thats your total argument as to how the SANFL would die.
UK Fan wrote:SANFL would die if we had no AFL involvement. So the SANFL makes no money out of the SANFL at all ?? Any chance you could explain how footy still exists in the ACT/NT and Tassie without any AFL teams.
UK Fan wrote:The difference between an AFL fan who checks on SANFL results. Compared to a real fan of the SANFL.
by UK Fan » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:09 pm
hondo71 wrote:UK Fan wrote:So each AFl team in SA makes $25m+ in revenue. And thats your total argument as to how the SANFL would die.
No it's not my "total argument" about anything. I was just balancing out your stats.UK Fan wrote:SANFL would die if we had no AFL involvement. So the SANFL makes no money out of the SANFL at all ?? Any chance you could explain how footy still exists in the ACT/NT and Tassie without any AFL teams.
Standard of ACT & NT <<<< SANFL comp. The SANFL makes far less money out of the SANFL comp (if any) than it does from the AAMI Stadium revenue sharing. Take one or both of those revenue streams out of footy in this state and the SANFL comp will take some sort of hit.UK Fan wrote:The difference between an AFL fan who checks on SANFL results. Compared to a real fan of the SANFL.
I go to more SANFL games than I do AFL games and I am a member of NAFC, not the AFC.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Hondo » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:14 pm
by doggies4eva » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:53 pm
by UK Fan » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:05 pm
hondo71 wrote:UK Fan wrote:Infact Ill bet anyone the SANFL without any involvement in the AFL would survive twice as long as the AFL without any SA teams being involved in their comp.
Do you have any idea what revenue from the AAMI Stadium's 22 AFL games generates for footy in this state? No AFL teams in SA = death of SANFL (in its current form).
You think the 10,000 people that go to the SANFL each week and the lucrative TV rights deal with the ABC would sustain it longer than the AFL?
How much are you willing to bet?
hondo71 wrote:Yawn
I said it would die "in it's current form". Not that it would die full stop.
You need to read my posts properly before you charge off on angry tangents. Sounds like we actually agree with each other.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Hondo » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:51 pm
UK Fan wrote:So you wanted to bet cos we we agree with each other I see.
Interesting change of tact from someone who edited his post about the AFL clubs giving profits back to the football community. Where SANFL clubs just work for themselves and take $400K of the SANFL every year. What a great SANFL fan you are.
Nope you havent changed your tune at all Hondo.![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |