Masha wrote:Any new names added to the Lodge bandwagon for next year Browny? Walton?? Hayes??
add youself masha
by unknown source » Fri May 29, 2009 2:49 am
Masha wrote:Any new names added to the Lodge bandwagon for next year Browny? Walton?? Hayes??
by unknown source » Fri May 29, 2009 2:51 am
saveyourlegs wrote:browny2323 wrote:Masha wrote:Any new names added to the Lodge bandwagon for next year Browny? Walton?? Hayes??
There is a few in the pipeline mate..
Could be the tigers year next season browny? unless the rumour is true that iloveshanebrown will be leaving? Haven't seen iloveshanebrown on here for a while but maybe he could put the rumour to rest...
by Lightning McQueen » Fri May 29, 2009 1:52 pm
by Browny25 » Fri May 29, 2009 3:14 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:It appears as though the we will remain at 8 team divisions for 09/10. Thoughts anyone?
by smac » Fri May 29, 2009 8:17 pm
browny2323 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:It appears as though the we will remain at 8 team divisions for 09/10. Thoughts anyone?
Grade 1 will be weak
by catchit » Fri May 29, 2009 8:42 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:It appears as though the we will remain at 8 team divisions for 09/10. Thoughts anyone?
by TrueRoo » Fri May 29, 2009 9:55 pm
by unknown source » Sat May 30, 2009 12:46 am
by Iwasthere84 » Sat May 30, 2009 9:27 am
unknown source wrote:i would rather a eight team comp personally im sure it could work.. or at least the higher grades be 8 teams div 1 or 2 maybe.. thats just my thoughts
by Iwasthere84 » Sat May 30, 2009 9:32 am
TrueRoo wrote:Probable Gradings for 2009/2010 6 Team Comp.
Grade 1
SALIS WEST
VIRGINIA
BRAHMA LODGE
ONE TREE HILL
ANGLE VALE
SALIS NORTH
Grade 2
ROSE N CROWN
ATCO
CRAIGMORE
PLAYFORD
EAST PARK
CENT UNITED
Grade 3
PARAFIELD GDNS
RIVERSIDE
WILLASTON
SMITHFIELD
ELIZ EAST
TWO WELLS
Grade 4
SALIS WEST B
BRAHMA LODGE B
ONE TREE HILL B
PARA TEACHERS A
WASLEYS A
ANGLE VALE B
Grade 5
SALIS NORTH B
CRAIGMORE B
CENT UNITED B
EAST PARK B
PARAFIELD GDNS B
NORTH PINES A
Grade 6
SMITHFIELD B
ROSE N CROWN B
ATCO B
BRAHMA LODGE C
SALIS WEST C
PLAYFORD B
Grade 7
VIRGINIA B
ELIZ EAST B
SALIS NTH C
SMITHFIELD B
ATCO C
RIVERSIDE B
Grade 8
BRAHMA LODGE D
ELIZ EAST C
ANGLE VALE C
TWO WELLS B
SALIS WEST D
CRAIGMORE C
Grade 9
NORTH PINES B
CENT UNITED C
BRAHMA LODGE E
SALIS WEST E
SALIS NTH D
ANGLE VALE D
Grade 10
ATCO D
PLAYFORD C
ROSE N CROWN C
CRAIGMORE D
ELIZ EAST D
EAST PARK C
Thoughts ?
by norm11 » Sat May 30, 2009 9:56 am
TrueRoo wrote:Probable Gradings for 2009/2010 6 Team Comp.
Grade 1
SALIS WEST
VIRGINIA
BRAHMA LODGE
ONE TREE HILL
ANGLE VALE
SALIS NORTH
Grade 2
ROSE N CROWN
ATCO
CRAIGMORE
PLAYFORD
EAST PARK
CENT UNITED
Grade 3
PARAFIELD GDNS
RIVERSIDE
WILLASTON
SMITHFIELD
ELIZ EAST
TWO WELLS
Grade 4
SALIS WEST B
BRAHMA LODGE B
ONE TREE HILL B
PARA TEACHERS A
WASLEYS A
ANGLE VALE B
Grade 5
SALIS NORTH B
CRAIGMORE B
CENT UNITED B
EAST PARK B
PARAFIELD GDNS B
NORTH PINES A
Grade 6
SMITHFIELD B
ROSE N CROWN B
ATCO B
BRAHMA LODGE C
SALIS WEST C
PLAYFORD B
Grade 7
VIRGINIA B
ELIZ EAST B
SALIS NTH C
SMITHFIELD B
ATCO C
RIVERSIDE B
Grade 8
BRAHMA LODGE D
ELIZ EAST C
ANGLE VALE C
TWO WELLS B
SALIS WEST D
CRAIGMORE C
Grade 9
NORTH PINES B
CENT UNITED C
BRAHMA LODGE E
SALIS WEST E
SALIS NTH D
ANGLE VALE D
Grade 10
ATCO D
PLAYFORD C
ROSE N CROWN C
CRAIGMORE D
ELIZ EAST D
EAST PARK C
Thoughts ?
by auto » Sat May 30, 2009 12:08 pm
Iwasthere84 wrote:unknown source wrote:i would rather a eight team comp personally im sure it could work.. or at least the higher grades be 8 teams div 1 or 2 maybe.. thats just my thoughts
There are so many negatives in an eight team comp at the present day. I cant see any team being relegated from last year. There are too many spaces in every grade . Teams that got flogged last year will not go down. You will see at this stage six eight team grades with possibly 11 teams left over.This is of course if no one else pulls out. There are big question marks if Eliz East will continue their rise. Interesting to see how many clubs nominate the same amount of teams.
Too many clubs are sitting on their hands thinking everything will be OK. We are in 2009/10. Time for changes. If change is not made now, this is the start of the end for PDCA. One big club has left, how many others will follow?
by cantbatcantbowl » Sat May 30, 2009 1:29 pm
automaticwicky wrote:Iwasthere84 wrote:unknown source wrote:i would rather a eight team comp personally im sure it could work.. or at least the higher grades be 8 teams div 1 or 2 maybe.. thats just my thoughts
There are so many negatives in an eight team comp at the present day. I cant see any team being relegated from last year. There are too many spaces in every grade . Teams that got flogged last year will not go down. You will see at this stage six eight team grades with possibly 11 teams left over.This is of course if no one else pulls out. There are big question marks if Eliz East will continue their rise. Interesting to see how many clubs nominate the same amount of teams.
Too many clubs are sitting on their hands thinking everything will be OK. We are in 2009/10. Time for changes. If change is not made now, this is the start of the end for PDCA. One big club has left, how many others will follow?
If churches is surviving, then you should have no worries. Just a question however, is it time for a north and south hard wicket competitions?
by cantbatcantbowl » Sat May 30, 2009 1:31 pm
by unknown source » Sun May 31, 2009 4:41 am
cantbatcantbowl wrote:automaticwicky wrote:Iwasthere84 wrote:unknown source wrote:i would rather a eight team comp personally im sure it could work.. or at least the higher grades be 8 teams div 1 or 2 maybe.. thats just my thoughts
There are so many negatives in an eight team comp at the present day. I cant see any team being relegated from last year. There are too many spaces in every grade . Teams that got flogged last year will not go down. You will see at this stage six eight team grades with possibly 11 teams left over.This is of course if no one else pulls out. There are big question marks if Eliz East will continue their rise. Interesting to see how many clubs nominate the same amount of teams.
Too many clubs are sitting on their hands thinking everything will be OK. We are in 2009/10. Time for changes. If change is not made now, this is the start of the end for PDCA. One big club has left, how many others will follow?
If churches is surviving, then you should have no worries. Just a question however, is it time for a north and south hard wicket competitions?
or maybe para districts and the churches league join together?
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:38 am
cantbatcantbowl wrote:Looks like the grade 1 comp will be pretty strong. Angle vale are a real chance of taking it out.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:41 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:50 am
by Iwasthere84 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:10 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Hey TrueRoo or 84, if that list was submitted to all of the clubs, I reckon you would find a swing in the direction for the 6 team comp, I think the biggest issue is that some clubs felt as though they would not get their promotion rights or will go down without deserving it.
Now a draw needs to be made up to show clubs the advantages.
by unknown source » Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:43 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |