by Tooting Bec » Fri May 22, 2009 11:17 am
by Amateur Footy » Fri May 22, 2009 11:23 am
by Armytank » Fri May 22, 2009 11:40 am
The Gimp wrote:Armytank wrote:I can confirm that Longman got off.........absolutely pathetic from the commmissioners
I'm not sure how many witness's were there for each side or what evidence was put forward but which part is pathetic?
What did the video show - did they present that at the tribunal?
by The Gimp » Fri May 22, 2009 11:43 am
Amateur Footy wrote:Well while you blokes argue about Vidic, we have a goal umpire and player who feel very much let down by the 'club report' system. Why would a goal umpire make a report unless he felt it was necessary when it means he needs to attend a tribunual hearing during the week? I find it unbelievable that a player's word would be held in higher regard than the goal umpire when the 'victim' was required to attend hospital to have a dislocated jaw put back in place. How does a bloke get a dislocated jaw when only two players are standing in the goal square?
by Armytank » Fri May 22, 2009 11:57 am
The Gimp wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:Well while you blokes argue about Vidic, we have a goal umpire and player who feel very much let down by the 'club report' system. Why would a goal umpire make a report unless he felt it was necessary when it means he needs to attend a tribunual hearing during the week? I find it unbelievable that a player's word would be held in higher regard than the goal umpire when the 'victim' was required to attend hospital to have a dislocated jaw put back in place. How does a bloke get a dislocated jaw when only two players are standing in the goal square?
Well now your player and goal umpire know exactly how we felt after a similar hearing when a kid got a dislocated elbow from being stomped on.
I'm not saying either decision was right or wrong but the commission make a decision on the cases put forward.
In this latest case, your goal umpire got it totally wrong in what he thought happened. Despite the injury recieved, it was an accident and there was no malice involved.
Just because someone is injured, doesn't mean someone actually went out of their way to intentionally cause the injury.
by The Gimp » Fri May 22, 2009 12:02 pm
by magpiemaster » Fri May 22, 2009 12:17 pm
by Armytank » Fri May 22, 2009 12:22 pm
The Gimp wrote:It's not a tit-for-tat arguement. I merely stated that you guys are feeling exactly the same way as what we felt when the decision didn't go our way.
Get over it.
by CountryVic » Fri May 22, 2009 12:25 pm
by BALLHOG » Fri May 22, 2009 12:51 pm
Tooting Bec wrote:I wish the new posters on here could type properly. This isn't a bloody high school texting forum. Lift your game lads. Enough of last weeks games, vidic has gotten a game and lets move on from here.
I'm heading out to watch the uraidla mt lofty game this weekend. Should be a good one with I reckon lofty's by under 2 goals. The next month according to the president of lofty will really shape the season with uraidla, hahndorf, bridgy and then blackwood.
Tips for this weekend chaps?
by Banker » Fri May 22, 2009 12:54 pm
The Gimp wrote:In this latest case, your goal umpire got it totally wrong in what he thought happened. Despite the injury recieved, it was an accident and there was no malice involved.
by BALLHOG » Fri May 22, 2009 12:56 pm
magpiemaster wrote:mt lofty v Uraidla will tell a big picture on how this year will go and if any team are as good as mT lofty. i think uri have been in front of both blackwood and handorf goign into the last quaters but been over run so they might need a bigger lead against a fit and quick mt lofty side. i think lofty with the likes of burch, peterson grey, pistola, gordon stapelton are all match winners and dont think uri have the cattle to go with these guys. lofty by 6 goal.
Bridgewater v Hahndorf - we will smash bridgy. coming off a loss the boys r really focused on smashing bridgy this week. bridgy may have improved this year but they are a young side who we will exploit physicaly and mentally. gags is in great form right now and i think he will kick a bag along with coops having the ball on a string.
Onka Valley v Mt. Barker - onkas have started this season well and mt barker have been weak. i think onkas new recruits have been a steadying influence on the side and with klun and kirwan in form they will belt nunans side by 10 goal. nunan would have to do the unthinkable for mt barker to win and cant see it happening.
Ironbank v Lobethal - 2 s***t sides no one cares about. 2 weeks ago i would have said aufterhide would get lobey up by kicking a bag, but now with bradley in town ironbank are a stronger side and should in by 5 goal but should b a very competitive match.
Blackwood v Birdwood - will be great to see if birdwood can take it up 2 the form side in the comp, they will have to shut down roach and gigney and if they can do that by winning there share of the footy forward then i give them a chance but i just dont see them being able to do it for 4 quaters against a quality outfit who just go hard all day and never stop running the footy. blackwood by 8 goal
by Tanka » Fri May 22, 2009 1:39 pm
Banker wrote:The Gimp wrote:In this latest case, your goal umpire got it totally wrong in what he thought happened. Despite the injury recieved, it was an accident and there was no malice involved.
Totally wrong?
If he took this to court to get his hospital fees back, we all know who would win.
by Zipper » Fri May 22, 2009 1:53 pm
Tooting Bec wrote:I wish the new posters on here could type properly. This isn't a bloody high school texting forum. Lift your game lads. Enough of last weeks games, vidic has gotten a game and lets move on from here.
I'm heading out to watch the uraidla mt lofty game this weekend. Should be a good one with I reckon lofty's by under 2 goals. The next month according to the president of lofty will really shape the season with uraidla, hahndorf, bridgy and then blackwood.
Tips for this weekend chaps?
by Amateur Footy » Fri May 22, 2009 2:02 pm
Zipper wrote:Tooting Bec wrote:I wish the new posters on here could type properly. This isn't a bloody high school texting forum. Lift your game lads. Enough of last weeks games, vidic has gotten a game and lets move on from here.
I'm heading out to watch the uraidla mt lofty game this weekend. Should be a good one with I reckon lofty's by under 2 goals. The next month according to the president of lofty will really shape the season with uraidla, hahndorf, bridgy and then blackwood.
Tips for this weekend chaps?
You recon Bridgy will be ahead of Blackwood?
by Tooting Bec » Fri May 22, 2009 2:30 pm
BALLHOG wrote:Tooting Bec wrote:I wish the new posters on here could type properly. This isn't a bloody high school texting forum. Lift your game lads. Enough of last weeks games, vidic has gotten a game and lets move on from here.
I'm heading out to watch the uraidla mt lofty game this weekend. Should be a good one with I reckon lofty's by under 2 goals. The next month according to the president of lofty will really shape the season with uraidla, hahndorf, bridgy and then blackwood.
Tips for this weekend chaps?
Are you an English teacher or something Tooting? Why are you going to the Mt Lofty game Tooting is it a sponsers day?
by MR JUICY » Fri May 22, 2009 3:05 pm
by Bat Pad » Fri May 22, 2009 3:24 pm
MR JUICY wrote:Sounds like the Hills tribunal are at it again hey. Need consistency with behind the play hits. It seems like its either extreme suspension if everyone carrys on and sooks about it to the league, exaggaruates the injury, screams for justice, prints it in the courier & prints it in the match day budget or whatever its called before the hearing heard - OR they get 1 week or EVEN nothing. You say evidence was there - I say crap as a bloke got 9 weeks from memory last year and no evidence I know of, just he said vs he said - couldn't recognize him at the first hearing then slammed, as they wanted someones head due to the build up of bull##%. Get it right and be dam consistent. Even if it was an accident I doubt the Ironbank player whacked himself in the jaw. Good luck this weekend all. Feel free to whack someone as you only need a good story as the league tribunal jumps onboard good stories as proven before.![]()
Hope the young lad gets better asap - never does anything dirty - sounds like he was doing his job and defending tightly to me.
by Tanka » Fri May 22, 2009 4:24 pm
Bat Pad wrote:MR JUICY wrote:Sounds like the Hills tribunal are at it again hey. Need consistency with behind the play hits. It seems like its either extreme suspension if everyone carrys on and sooks about it to the league, exaggaruates the injury, screams for justice, prints it in the courier & prints it in the match day budget or whatever its called before the hearing heard - OR they get 1 week or EVEN nothing. You say evidence was there - I say crap as a bloke got 9 weeks from memory last year and no evidence I know of, just he said vs he said - couldn't recognize him at the first hearing then slammed, as they wanted someones head due to the build up of bull##%. Get it right and be dam consistent. Even if it was an accident I doubt the Ironbank player whacked himself in the jaw. Good luck this weekend all. Feel free to whack someone as you only need a good story as the league tribunal jumps onboard good stories as proven before.![]()
Hope the young lad gets better asap - never does anything dirty - sounds like he was doing his job and defending tightly to me.
Not sure which incident you are refering to with the 9 week suspension, but if it is the Blackwood vs Bridgewater incident I believe there was video evidence given which was pretty conclusive.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |