HFL Division 1 (Central)

Talk on any country footy league or club from the SA Country area

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby thunderchild » Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:49 pm

The informer wrote:roosters won by about 6 goals....
Good contest with the boys just to strong.


means first win for J davis as captain if im correct?

well respected bloke in my opinion - one of the hardest blokes you'll see go for a footy - any other stands outs informer?
thunderchild
Mini-League
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:03 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby false » Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:09 pm

thunderchild wrote:
The informer wrote:roosters won by about 6 goals....
Good contest with the boys just to strong.


means first win for J davis as captain if im correct?

well respected bloke in my opinion - one of the hardest blokes you'll see go for a footy - any other stands outs informer?


Dempsey BOG in my opinion, big Robbie in ruck, Bubner handy, Scotty Friend, Magoo handy.
User avatar
false
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:31 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Birdwood

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby BALLHOG » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:43 am

So a fair win to Birdwood then by the sounds of things. It's been a rough start for Bridgy only one win from the first three, not the start they would have been after with the big recruits they have this year. Should account for Loby this week but can't see to many more wins in the following six games. Didn't see the match were Birdwood good or did Bridgy just have an off day?
User avatar
BALLHOG
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby The Gimp » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:11 am

It was a pretty tight game between Birdwood and Bridgy apart from the 2nd qtr when the Roosters kicked away and opened up a match winning lead.
Birdwood seemed to just take the foot off a bit in the 2nd half but credit to Bridgy, they lifted in the 2nd half and make Birdwood work for every possession.
Bridgy have a couple of pretty good young fellas which should put them in good stead for the next few years (if they can hang onto their recruits).
I'm not sure what the other teams that have played against Bridgy think but From watching the match I would have to say DeVries is a protected species. Every time he went near the ball he either marked it or was given a free kick.
IMO umpiring was pretty poor.
The Gimp
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:35 pm
Location: SA
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Birdwood

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby magpie in the 80's » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:55 am

Full Round of scores

Blackwood 12.7 (79) def Onka Valley 6.10 (46)
Mt Lofty 17.11 (113) def Ironbank 6.6 (42)
Birdwood 16.13 (109) def Bridgewater 11.5 (71)

magpie in the 80's wrote:Uraidla Districts 6.19 (55) d Mount Barker 3.8 (26).
Hahndorf 24.13 (157) d Lobethal 7.3 (45).


I went to a fight the other night, and a hockey game broke out. - Rodney Dangerfield (1921 - 2004)
User avatar
magpie in the 80's
Coach
 
 
Posts: 35437
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: in the quiz books
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 24 times

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby false » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:24 am

The Gimp wrote:It was a pretty tight game between Birdwood and Bridgy apart from the 2nd qtr when the Roosters kicked away and opened up a match winning lead.
Birdwood seemed to just take the foot off a bit in the 2nd half but credit to Bridgy, they lifted in the 2nd half and make Birdwood work for every possession.
Bridgy have a couple of pretty good young fellas which should put them in good stead for the next few years (if they can hang onto their recruits).
I'm not sure what the other teams that have played against Bridgy think but From watching the match I would have to say DeVries is a protected species. Every time he went near the ball he either marked it or was given a free kick.
IMO umpiring was pretty poor.


one of the worst umpiring displays i've seen. I could count the amount of frees we got on one hand i reckon.

Lukey Highfold another standout game! great young player.
User avatar
false
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:31 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Birdwood

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby Monkey » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:24 am

The informer wrote:
thunderchild wrote:
The informer wrote:roosters won by about 6 goals....
Good contest with the boys just to strong.


means first win for J davis as captain if im correct?

well respected bloke in my opinion - one of the hardest blokes you'll see go for a footy - any other stands outs informer?


Dempsey BOG in my opinion, big Robbie in ruck, Bubner handy, Scotty Friend, Magoo handy.


Monkey thinks Dempsey is a big loss for North Haven and big plus for Birdwood.
Born from an egg on a mountain top, The punkiest monkey that ever popped
User avatar
Monkey
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:55 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Uraidla Districts

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby The Gimp » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:30 am

Monkey would be right!
The Gimp
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:35 pm
Location: SA
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Birdwood

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby BALL BANGER » Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:53 pm

WIN AT ALL COST$$$
I would like to know from the teams that has a loss on the weekend, at what COST did it set back your clubs. I'm a Bridgey Boy and I would say between $2500 to $3500 was probably on the paddock. Now I'm not having a crack at the players taking the money ( best recruits I've seen at Bridgewater in 10 yrs ) Nor I'm I having a go at clubs for paying the price. The State of Amature Footy at the moment I think there's a lot of one-way traffic for a lot of clubs out there.
1. When did Footy Clubs start paying ridiculous prices for players, com'on $600 - $800 a game is
a bit of a joke. Herd as much as $1200 a game this year.
2. How much money is going back into the clubs 10% - 20% ??? meals & bar
3. How much longer can clubs survive spending money just to stay competitive. ( not finals,
COMPETITIVE!!! )
It's happening all over the State. I think something needs to be done, so clubs can stay alive. But What??? SANFL / AFL involvement??? Not Sure???
BALL BANGER
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby Dashin » Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:39 pm

peekay wrote:Classic story behind that name.


a funny story indeed...just wondering if there's a correlation between that story and the name or if it's just a random coincidence....
Dashin
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby the big fella » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:06 pm

ball banger..youre right..where have been lately..refer posts on country div site..the country teams have put up with T$V for last (4) yrs and the HFl have turned a blind eye..now it has come back to bite them on the backside..
the big fella
Under 18s
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: west of the mount
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby CountryVic » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:24 pm

BALL BANGER wrote:WIN AT ALL COST$$$
I would like to know from the teams that has a loss on the weekend, at what COST did it set back your clubs. I'm a Bridgey Boy and I would say between $2500 to $3500 was probably on the paddock. Now I'm not having a crack at the players taking the money ( best recruits I've seen at Bridgewater in 10 yrs ) Nor I'm I having a go at clubs for paying the price. The State of Amature Footy at the moment I think there's a lot of one-way traffic for a lot of clubs out there.
1. When did Footy Clubs start paying ridiculous prices for players, com'on $600 - $800 a game is
a bit of a joke. Herd as much as $1200 a game this year.
2. How much money is going back into the clubs 10% - 20% ??? meals & bar
3. How much longer can clubs survive spending money just to stay competitive. ( not finals,
COMPETITIVE!!! )
It's happening all over the State. I think something needs to be done, so clubs can stay alive. But What??? SANFL / AFL involvement??? Not Sure???

I think you you find that clubs are not pinning there hopes on players putting the entire amount back over the bar, more so the supporters that will get to more games to see the better players and their team being more successful or as you stated even more competitive then previous years.
The amount of $'s getting paid is out of hand no doubt, but the only alternative seems to be a Salary Cap which most leagues have tried and failed with as it is near impossible to police.
The only way to go it is recruit smarter, don't get into a bidding war. Easier said then done obviously as it has escalated and won't go back.

Also BB i wouldn't suggest splashing around figures on how much cash runs around the paddock, even for your own team as it does no good for anyone and it's complete pie in the sky stuff with no facts to back it up.
I'm no leader. I do what I have to do - sometimes people come with me.
CountryVic
Member
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Dodging Work
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby Worm Burner » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:26 pm

The informer wrote:
The Gimp wrote:It was a pretty tight game between Birdwood and Bridgy apart from the 2nd qtr when the Roosters kicked away and opened up a match winning lead.
Birdwood seemed to just take the foot off a bit in the 2nd half but credit to Bridgy, they lifted in the 2nd half and make Birdwood work for every possession.
Bridgy have a couple of pretty good young fellas which should put them in good stead for the next few years (if they can hang onto their recruits).
I'm not sure what the other teams that have played against Bridgy think but From watching the match I would have to say DeVries is a protected species. Every time he went near the ball he either marked it or was given a free kick.
IMO umpiring was pretty poor.


one of the worst umpiring displays i've seen. I could count the amount of frees we got on one hand i reckon.

Lukey Highfold another standout game! great young player.


Luke dished out some heavy hits. great to see. Dempsey was heads above the rest, he had the ball on a string. the umps called a few yellow cards, not quite sure what for but they didn't call/missed a lot of frees.
Worm Burner
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:03 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Birdwood

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby can't beat the facts » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:40 pm

BALL BANGER wrote:WIN AT ALL COST$$$
I would like to know from the teams that has a loss on the weekend, at what COST did it set back your clubs. I'm a Bridgey Boy and I would say between $2500 to $3500 was probably on the paddock. Now I'm not having a crack at the players taking the money ( best recruits I've seen at Bridgewater in 10 yrs ) Nor I'm I having a go at clubs for paying the price. The State of Amature Footy at the moment I think there's a lot of one-way traffic for a lot of clubs out there.
1. When did Footy Clubs start paying ridiculous prices for players, com'on $600 - $800 a game is
a bit of a joke. Herd as much as $1200 a game this year.
2. How much money is going back into the clubs 10% - 20% ??? meals & bar
3. How much longer can clubs survive spending money just to stay competitive. ( not finals,
COMPETITIVE!!! )
It's happening all over the State. I think something needs to be done, so clubs can stay alive. But What??? SANFL / AFL involvement??? Not Sure???



Well said Ball Banger. Player payments are totally out of control, and I think will destroy nearly all footy, except the afl, in a short time. I know that the SANFL are extremely worried about the continual exodus of players into other leagues, such as the HFL.
As a player, why not accept the $$ being offered?? A SAnfl reserves player probably gets $50 in his pocket for a game; he can take a short drive up the freeway, get a lot more $$, and train 2 nights instead of 5 nights.
Something has to be done, better sooner than later!!
can't beat the facts
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:58 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Mt Lofty

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby OnThePine... » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:59 pm

while we're on the subject of Birdwood v Bridgies, big Liam kicked another 12 in the senior colts, taking his tally to 24 from 3 games. would have to say he'd be on track for back-to-back hills trophies. Roosters colts would have to be hot tip for the flag with the talent theyve got running around at the moment...
OnThePine...
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 11:09 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby Bat Pad » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:08 pm

OnThePine... wrote:while we're on the subject of Birdwood v Bridgies, big Liam kicked another 12 in the senior colts, taking his tally to 24 from 3 games. would have to say he'd be on track for back-to-back hills trophies. Roosters colts would have to be hot tip for the flag with the talent theyve got running around at the moment...


Big call considering they lost at home last week.
Bat Pad
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:03 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby BALL BANGER » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:09 pm

C-Vic.
Fact or Fiction big money is being spent, so why hide the amount? Most clubs would be spending that week in week out, that's just the way footy is at the moment. If that's the amount going around at the moment then Bridgey and Clubs like them need to be paying it. But what's going to happen to these clubs when the money dries up?
Suggestion: Leagues need to be involved in all financial contracts e.g HFL, GSFL. I think that they should look at taking a % of all match payments say 10% for 1 of 2 things.
1. Save it for a rainy day for things like Club Rescue Packages, Lighting Up-Grades or things like Kersbrook's Oval situation last year ( by the way, well done boys! )
2. Or the money accumilated for that year is then divided between the clubs evenly for the next.
Another suggestion is all clubs contribute a fixed amount say $40K. The money is then offered to interested talented players to come play in the HFL, but are then drafted out to clubs like the AFL Draft system. Just some suggestions.
Again please don't think this is directed at Players or Clubs, more at League Footy itself. I'm sure is happens in other States too.
BALL BANGER
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby Confucius » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:33 pm

Won't work BB......they've tried a salary cap before and its impossible to police. I think the points system is the only way they can go but:

1. It will take a few years to work
2. They need to look at either reducing the number of points available or staggering the available points so that the lower ranked teams get more points than those higher the following year eg bottom two teams get 35points, top two teams 25 points
Confucius
Member
 
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
Location: Beijing
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby woody » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:40 pm

Confucius wrote:Won't work BB......they've tried a salary cap before and its impossible to police. I think the points system is the only way they can go but:

1. It will take a few years to work
2. They need to look at either reducing the number of points available or staggering the available points so that the lower ranked teams get more points than those higher the following year eg bottom two teams get 35points, top two teams 25 points



Go along tonight to the HFL meeting concerning the points system. HFL house at 7.30 TONIGHT.
Have a say and change the points so that they more accurately reflect lack of locals in a team.
woody
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 10:21 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: HFL Central Division

Postby Amateur Footy » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:49 pm

I have harped on player payments before, but it certainly has escalated in recent seasons. While Alex is sitting on his fat salary from the AFL he hasn't done a thing for grass roots football, just increased the AFL's revenue and his own. The points system is a joke as it prevent lower clubs from recruiting and was only aimed at stopping too many AFL/SANFL players leaving for lower grades. Placing less points available to higher ranked teams encourages them to pay more for less. The salary cap can't work unless the AFL get behind it and supply many inspectors with the same powers to review club/paid player finances as in the AFL - not going to happen, but I'd love to see it. Really going to need some thought from SANFL/AFL.

For now I'll remain proud to play for a club that can afford less than half the players costs of it's nearest spending rival (perhaps with exception of Loby), let alone the teams spending big. We will just have to hope that some of the 'fat cats' who pump big money into Hills footy clubs disappear in the financial crisis!
Amateur Footy
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:42 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 7 times
Grassroots Team: Ironbank

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Country Footy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |