carey18 wrote:Number 1 from Mitchell Park you are a disgrace.What you did today was a disgrace, if boxhead gets life for something that no one saw you should get the same. To be beaten in a legal contest and then try to kick our bloke in the head as he was on the ground is as weak as piss. yes every one on here knows who i am so i don't care, you are as weak as piss for what you did today, and you are supposed to be a big recuirt. your as as weak as anyone i have seen on the field. Anyone who has the balls to defend this guy deserves the same. weak as piss
Well I guess I am as weak as piss for defending a good mate who did something incredibly stupid.
I would suggest if you saw the way he was in the change rooms you might understand that he would agree with nearly everything in your post.
The act he committed was indefensible, the person is not. He is a great guy who is extremely loyal to his friends and family.
carey wrote:you heard right mate the most dirty lowest act i'v ever seen could'nt believe if a team mate of mine did that i'd be flithy with him that was a joke umpires offered him 2games he took it as he should cause he deserved 8 to 10 games.
The club and his teammates are extremely disappointed. There have been internal sanctions put on Luke in addition to whatever he gets from the tribunal.
We are also steadfast in the belief that staying behind Luke as footballers and friends until he is able to return to the field will be the best option for club and player.
carey wrote:number 2 for mitchell park as well what a meat head fair dinkum have a go at some1 over 5foot would ya! weak as piss
This I will defend to the hilt. I suggest you might want to ask “number 2” how he ended up with cut across his eye (requiring 6 stitches) after being on the bottom of a pack? I did ask him and he told me that he got several punches to the head and what he did was simply reactionary.
Don’t go thinking all the Roo boys were saints and scholars out there. There were regrettable incidents from both teams.
carey wrote:what gets me about m/park is they have the basis for a good side they have a very good ruckmen 2 great forwards lead by bates a very hard in and under midfield yet as soon as they get behind out come the cheap shots and to all the little blokes aswell! they have a great coach who i have the upmost respect for he deserves better.
I think once we got a couple of key injuries/send offs it all went wrong and some stupid acts were committed.
I can say that this is not going to be normal for Mitchell Park this year. It is not going to be the way we go about our football. This was made evidently clear by the coach, senior players and the committee to everyone involved at the club.
The Real Number 3 wrote:Was sitting 5 metres away from the most biggest dog act i have ever seen in football. #1 from MP trying to send Hailesy's head into orbit with a kick resembling Ben Grahams punts in the NFL. Was an absolute disgrace. Should have the book thrown at him. But, without a doubt, he will most likely get 1-2 games.
Surely an attempted full force kick to the head is more serious than accidental contact to the throat. No doubt the tribunal will have a total different view of it because there was minimal contact and our bloke didnt get injured. Imagine if it did connect..... our bloke would have been in a real bad way.
Looking forward to finding out the tribunal verdicts this week.
Other than disagreeing with the hyperbole surrounding the force of the kick in your post, the rest I agree with.