by silicone skyline » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:37 pm
by Bob Loblaw » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:48 pm
silicone skyline wrote:I hope Parnell comes in. I reckon the Aussies would destroy him with his inexpereince much like Langer destroyed Makhya Ntini back in 2001/2002(??).
Albie is a proven talent, although what's his test record?
by silicone skyline » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:50 pm
by Bob Loblaw » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:57 pm
by silicone skyline » Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:04 pm
by smithy » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:09 pm
silicone skyline wrote:Anyone with red hair is generally doomed to fail.
There are a few exceptions to this rule but in general it applies!
by silicone skyline » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:12 pm
smithy wrote:silicone skyline wrote:Anyone with red hair is generally doomed to fail.
There are a few exceptions to this rule but in general it applies!
What an intelligent post.
I bet people are beating down the door to be just like you.
You are an inspiration to everyone.
by CoverKing » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:15 pm
by Pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:21 pm
CoverKing wrote:Honestly, if morkel comes into replace his brother IMO that weakens there bowling a great deal, but helps there batting. Albie does not bowl that well IMO. Prine and Khan coming in is a massive loss and IMO i thought they would have stayed with McKenzie due to smith's injury. i thought that woulda saved them. but making two changes to the opening position may well prove to be a big f*** up or a great move...
I cant see the aussies losing this test now. Would like to see Hauritz play if there going to mkae any changes
by CoverKing » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:32 pm
Pup wrote:CoverKing wrote:Honestly, if morkel comes into replace his brother IMO that weakens there bowling a great deal, but helps there batting. Albie does not bowl that well IMO. Prine and Khan coming in is a massive loss and IMO i thought they would have stayed with McKenzie due to smith's injury. i thought that woulda saved them. but making two changes to the opening position may well prove to be a big f*** up or a great move...
I cant see the aussies losing this test now. Would like to see Hauritz play if there going to mkae any changes
How is Prince coming in for McKenzie a massive loss?
Your right about the Morkel brothers but dont be surprised if Parnell plays instead of Albie, they are currently going head to head in a first class match so lets wait and see what happens there.
by Pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:07 pm
by Booney » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:29 pm
by rod_rooster » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:36 pm
Pup wrote:Oh ok point taken although i would be looking at Khan for Smith given that he wont retain his spot when he comes back but Prince should.
For those interested in the South Africans current form in their first class matches.
Prince is unbeaten on 171* against an attack that consists both Morkel brothers and Paul Harris. Morne has been very tight and has 1/43 from 19 but his brother has been pretty expensive with 0/73 from 17. Parnell is playing for the other side so has his chance to really push his case given Albies poor spell.
Mckenzies poor form continued in another game making only 4.
by Pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:10 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Pup wrote:Oh ok point taken although i would be looking at Khan for Smith given that he wont retain his spot when he comes back but Prince should.
For those interested in the South Africans current form in their first class matches.
Prince is unbeaten on 171* against an attack that consists both Morkel brothers and Paul Harris. Morne has been very tight and has 1/43 from 19 but his brother has been pretty expensive with 0/73 from 17. Parnell is playing for the other side so has his chance to really push his case given Albies poor spell.
Mckenzies poor form continued in another game making only 4.
Making runs against an attack featuring Paul Harris........ wow that's impressive![]()
![]()
by rod_rooster » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:12 pm
Pup wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Pup wrote:Oh ok point taken although i would be looking at Khan for Smith given that he wont retain his spot when he comes back but Prince should.
For those interested in the South Africans current form in their first class matches.
Prince is unbeaten on 171* against an attack that consists both Morkel brothers and Paul Harris. Morne has been very tight and has 1/43 from 19 but his brother has been pretty expensive with 0/73 from 17. Parnell is playing for the other side so has his chance to really push his case given Albies poor spell.
Mckenzies poor form continued in another game making only 4.
Making runs against an attack featuring Paul Harris........ wow that's impressive![]()
![]()
Haha was just informing people what South African Test Players were playing
by CoverKing » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:15 pm
Pup wrote:Oh ok point taken although i would be looking at Khan for Smith given that he wont retain his spot when he comes back but Prince should.
For those interested in the South Africans current form in their first class matches.
Prince is unbeaten on 171* against an attack that consists both Morkel brothers and Paul Harris. Morne has been very tight and has 1/43 from 19 but his brother has been pretty expensive with 0/73 from 17. Parnell is playing for the other side so has his chance to really push his case given Albies poor spell.
Mckenzies poor form continued in another game making only 4.
by CoverKing » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:17 pm
by Pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:47 pm
by Pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:48 pm
by rod_rooster » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:49 pm
Pup wrote:I personally do not think he is up to Test Standard. I think Mike Hussey should stay in the side regardless of this test and if by chance the selectors do prematurely wield the axe i would rather see Ferguson or another younger player enter the side.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |