LaughingKookaburra wrote:tell you what Don Bradman batted on shite decks that were not covered and still faced blokes who could bowl quick. Not to mention he only saw them each time he played them and could not really study them as there was no television. Don't kid yourself panther, he was unreal and saying he would have an average of 49 rather than 99 is an un-educated cricket comment imo. what if he had todays training or equipment??
what are you on LK ?
bradman was in his 70's when the west indian quicks were at their peak, i'd suggest a 49 run average is a fair call & infact bradman was asked a similar question about how he'd go & the don said i'd average around the 50 mark, when quizzed he replied well i am 83 years old