by Ron Burgundy » Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:11 pm
by ray borner » Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:14 pm
rainbow warrior wrote:ray borner wrote:Rainbow Warrior what was score from your match on saturday against gepps. Not in sunday mail
Gday Ray. We rolled Gepps for about 161 approx (cant remember exact score sorry) and we are 3/50 in reply. We are confident we can get over the line.
In our 20/20 match last night for those who are interested we defeated Pembroke. We got 1125 and bowled them out for 80 90 odd.
by Bluedemon » Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:25 pm
ray borner wrote:rainbow warrior wrote:ray borner wrote:Rainbow Warrior what was score from your match on saturday against gepps. Not in sunday mail
Gday Ray. We rolled Gepps for about 161 approx (cant remember exact score sorry) and we are 3/50 in reply. We are confident we can get over the line.
In our 20/20 match last night for those who are interested we defeated Pembroke. We got 1125 and bowled them out for 80 90 odd.
\
Cheers RW. Well Done in the 20/20 to. Scoring at 56.25 runs per over for 20 overs is an amazing effort. Any big tons.
by rainbow warrior » Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:37 pm
kookas wrote:ray borner wrote:rainbow warrior wrote:ray borner wrote:Rainbow Warrior what was score from your match on saturday against gepps. Not in sunday mail
Gday Ray. We rolled Gepps for about 161 approx (cant remember exact score sorry) and we are 3/50 in reply. We are confident we can get over the line.
In our 20/20 match last night for those who are interested we defeated Pembroke. We got 1125 and bowled them out for 80 90 odd.
\
Cheers RW. Well Done in the 20/20 to. Scoring at 56.25 runs per over for 20 overs is an amazing effort. Any big tons.
did the scorer had to use 2 pages to keep the total going. that was 9.375 runs per ball.
by matt » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:40 am
Ron Burgundy wrote:Agreed, the deck was very ordinary. Soft and difficult to bat on. The Council curate the oval and have been very hit and miss of late. Imagine a wetty at the end of the heatwave.
Having said that, both teams batted on it. Was a decent game but the pitch probably ruined what could have been a closer game.
by Bluedemon » Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:20 pm
by beeroclock » Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:19 am
by leftarmoffie » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:56 am
beeroclock wrote:Only one side assured of finals action at the moment,6 maybe 7 fighting for three spots.
by beeroclock » Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:44 pm
normstwin wrote:beeroclock wrote:Only one side assured of finals action at the moment,6 maybe 7 fighting for three spots.
Would u be talking bout A2 here??
by leftarmoffie » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:07 pm
beeroclock wrote:normstwin wrote:beeroclock wrote:Only one side assured of finals action at the moment,6 maybe 7 fighting for three spots.
Would u be talking bout A2 here??
Correct Norm sorry about that,fair effort by woody south and which henno would that have been boys,top score.
by Bluedemon » Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:59 pm
by Ron Burgundy » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:06 am
by ray borner » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:40 am
Ron Burgundy wrote:Apparently 20/20 semi finals tonight.
Goodwood 2 v Payneham at Payneham Oval. any idea of the other match?
by White Unicorn » Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:36 am
ray borner wrote:Ron Burgundy wrote:Apparently 20/20 semi finals tonight.
Goodwood 2 v Payneham at Payneham Oval. any idea of the other match?
AHOS and grange i think. Surely there should of been a Semi final involving the top four sides from each northern group and each southern group then a final for north and south. Then a playoff between the winner of south and the winner of north. I realise that would create a few extra games but it would be fair. At least you couldnt get knocked out of a competition without having lost a game.
by rainbow warrior » Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:55 am
White Unicorn wrote:ray borner wrote:Ron Burgundy wrote:Apparently 20/20 semi finals tonight.
Goodwood 2 v Payneham at Payneham Oval. any idea of the other match?
AHOS and grange i think. Surely there should of been a Semi final involving the top four sides from each northern group and each southern group then a final for north and south. Then a playoff between the winner of south and the winner of north. I realise that would create a few extra games but it would be fair. At least you couldnt get knocked out of a competition without having lost a game.
Yes its stupid. They changed the goal posts half way thru the comp too. To go thru undefeated and then to not make the semi's is a joke. Our club hasn't lost a 20/20 game in 3 years, is reigning champ, still undefeated yet cannot defend its crown! Rubbish
by bulldogs » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:04 pm
ray borner wrote:Ron Burgundy wrote:Apparently 20/20 semi finals tonight.
Goodwood 2 v Payneham at Payneham Oval. any idea of the other match?
AHOS and grange i think. Surely there should of been a Semi final involving the top four sides from each northern group and each southern group then a final for north and south. Then a playoff between the winner of south and the winner of north. I realise that would create a few extra games but it would be fair. At least you couldnt get knocked out of a competition without having lost a game.
by ray borner » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:07 pm
bulldogs wrote:ray borner wrote:Ron Burgundy wrote:Apparently 20/20 semi finals tonight.
Goodwood 2 v Payneham at Payneham Oval. any idea of the other match?
AHOS and grange i think. Surely there should of been a Semi final involving the top four sides from each northern group and each southern group then a final for north and south. Then a playoff between the winner of south and the winner of north. I realise that would create a few extra games but it would be fair. At least you couldnt get knocked out of a competition without having lost a game.
totally unorganised as per usual. There were 4 groups per division why didnt the top sides of each group in the north play off in a semi then the 2 winners a final ditto for south and the the 2 winners play off. not hard. atca are pathetic can get correct tables up all year. i had 2 send emails regarding incorrect tables to atca and point out the errors. C2 is still not correct, clubs fault as well for not sending reports in but in C2 they date back to rounds 5 and 6.
Bring back Gerry
by beeroclock » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:36 pm
by rainbow warrior » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:12 am
by Ron Burgundy » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:22 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |