
by rod_rooster » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:57 pm
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:59 pm
by PitBull » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:00 pm
rod_rooster wrote:As well as Siddle bowled yesterdy he has been dissapointing today. He has been well down on pace and has only now increased the pace. What happens? A wicket. He could be a very good bowler but he needs to produce the intensity throughout the match not just occasionally.
by NFC » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:02 pm
rod_rooster wrote:NFC wrote:rod_rooster wrote:No it's not mean it's just being a very very ordinary bloke. FFS after all the crap you have had to take about your man crush Watto you would think you'd have a bit more sense than that. What an ordinary thing to say about a guy who has taken 300 wickets for his country. Yeah lets bring Watto in with his wonderful record in Test cricket. That will make all the difference![]()
Mate, Lee's been a champion but he's ridiculously out of form. I know it's a harsh comment but the guy has been near useless for the past 8 tests and is doing this team no favours at all. If he's out we'll get an IN FORM bowler instead.
Cut the rubbish and emotioanl tripe, you know I'm right.
It's not emotional crap. I am not suggesting Lee is bowling well or should be retained in the side if fit or not but to be happy about an injury is absolutely f*cked up. Bad bloke sums you up well.
by rod_rooster » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:05 pm
PitBull wrote:rod_rooster wrote:As well as Siddle bowled yesterdy he has been dissapointing today. He has been well down on pace and has only now increased the pace. What happens? A wicket. He could be a very good bowler but he needs to produce the intensity throughout the match not just occasionally.
Very hard to maintain 140-150k pace for two days
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:15 pm
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:23 pm
by Dutchy » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:26 pm
FD88 wrote:Barring a ridiculous brain snap we won't take another wicket and they'll declare with a 100 or so run lead.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:29 pm
NFC wrote:Okay I'm prepared to say it, this team is done.
by Punk Rooster » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:35 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Sigh, Ntini let off strike by a bad ball and sloppy glovework from Haddin
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:37 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Sigh, Ntini let off strike by a bad ball and sloppy glovework from Haddin
refer to my earlier comment on Haddin
by spell_check » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:39 pm
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:40 pm
by NFC » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:41 pm
Dutchy wrote:FD88 wrote:Barring a ridiculous brain snap we won't take another wicket and they'll declare with a 100 or so run lead.
Talking about ridiculousWhy TF would they declare 100 up when they are 9 down
![]()
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:41 pm
by rod_rooster » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:44 pm
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:46 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Wonderful knock from Duminy. South Africa's biggest problem now is not what happens on the field but who misses out for Prince in the Sydney Test? You couldn't possibly drop Duminy. He is an amazing talent. McKenzie is the obvious one but who opens? Amla probably will have to move up.
by Dutchy » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:48 pm
NFC wrote:Dutchy wrote:FD88 wrote:Barring a ridiculous brain snap we won't take another wicket and they'll declare with a 100 or so run lead.
Talking about ridiculousWhy TF would they declare 100 up when they are 9 down
![]()
To have a chance to bowl tonight?
by locky801 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:05 pm
by spell_check » Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:06 pm
locky801 wrote:Believe there is to be a big announcement on the playing future of one Brett Lee
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |