Adelaide Suburban Cricket Assosciation.

[wycbloods]

Yes you can.

I asked you too .

[boozers]

surely would would have to add Scott Peek,Dion Hibberd to that list

[Booney]

We are adding people from our club,feel free to post away with yours...

[wycbloods]

surely would would have to add Scott Peek,Dion Hibberd to that list

If i went through every team then yes i would've added them they are/were both very good cricketers but as Booney said i think it is best we do our own clubs.

[boozers]

Here's a goodie....lol
Chris Farrant anyone remember him,apparently he runs a dog washing business now!

[wycbloods]

Here's a goodie....lol
Chris Farrant anyone remember him,apparently he runs a dog washing business now!

Yeah ask bundy bear about him he can tell you some cracking stories about Mr Farrant.

[boozers]

I bet! He was a strange one,fair cricketer though.
Does anyone know what the full team for the senior association side is?

[wycbloods]

AF or Roseboy where is Gill is he still playing A's with you boys?

[bazza1]

[quote="Amateur Footy"]I would say the standard had been slowly falling for about 20 years up until a year or so ago. Section 2 would now be stronger than I have ever seen and section 1 is back on the rise. The depth across all clubs may not yet be what it used to be but clubs at the top have probably got more depth in Sect 1 and 2 than for many years - we certainly have. I think the big difference is we are missing a few top players from a year or two ago. Look at the list of who has (come and) gone in last couple of years:

Sorry AF I have to disagree with you there mate, I played over 10 years of section 2 cricket and in the late 90's early 2000's that section was stronger than section 1 is now, you had to win 9 games to make the finals because there were 8-9 teams capable of playing finals. Section 2 now since we went up, south rd went up and Sheidow pk this year I think with out those A grade sides playing in it the standard wont be the same.

[wycbloods]

I would say the standard had been slowly falling for about 20 years up until a year or so ago. Section 2 would now be stronger than I have ever seen and section 1 is back on the rise. The depth across all clubs may not yet be what it used to be but clubs at the top have probably got more depth in Sect 1 and 2 than for many years - we certainly have. I think the big difference is we are missing a few top players from a year or two ago. Look at the list of who has (come and) gone in last couple of years:

Sorry AF I have to disagree with you there mate, I played over 10 years of section 2 cricket and in the late 90's early 2000's that section was stronger than section 1 is now, you had to win 9 games to make the finals because there were 8-9 teams capable of playing finals. Section 2 now since we went up, south rd went up and Sheidow pk this year I think with out those A grade sides playing in it the standard wont be the same.

That is a big call bazza i still think the top 4-6 sides of section would beat the section 2 sides of the last decade.

[bazza1]

To hard to say that they would beat the sides of today, all im trying to say there were less weaker sides back then, all through the grades. Any way Bloods how would you know, you werent even born

[wycbloods]

To hard to say that they would beat the sides of today, all im trying to say there were less weaker sides back then, all through the grades.

I agree with that but that is different to what you said in the other post .

[bazza1]

Its all in the interpretation, I said section 2 was stronger, i didnt say that they would beat the sides of today

[bazza1]

Ok mate it was more even...is that better

[wycbloods]

I would say the standard had been slowly falling for about 20 years up until a year or so ago. Section 2 would now be stronger than I have ever seen and section 1 is back on the rise. The depth across all clubs may not yet be what it used to be but clubs at the top have probably got more depth in Sect 1 and 2 than for many years - we certainly have. I think the big difference is we are missing a few top players from a year or two ago. Look at the list of who has (come and) gone in last couple of years:

Sorry AF I have to disagree with you there mate, I played over 10 years of section 2 cricket and in the late 90's early 2000's that section was stronger than section 1 is now, you had to win 9 games to make the finals because there were 8-9 teams capable of playing finals. Section 2 now since we went up, south rd went up and Sheidow pk this year I think with out those A grade sides playing in it the standard wont be the same.

I think by saying section 2 was stonger then than what section 1 is now that would be a fair 'interpretation' that they would beat the current section 1 sides. Maybe someone else will agree with me or tell me i am wrong.

[wycbloods]

Ok mate it was more even...is that better

still a different statement to the first. However, i do agree with this one.

[wycbloods]

In the past after 4 rounds the finals race wasn't between 6 sides it was between probably 10 so yes it was a much more even competition.

[bazza1]

Sorry your Honour

[wycbloods]

Sorry your Honour

You are forgiven my friend .

[bazza1]

Sheesh, committee meetings would be interesting down at WYC, I would suggest the Prez would be getting his way most of the time, would this be right Cover king, Booney