the joker wrote:well they are 1 for none
davis ran out by manou
It was Stumped as Manou is a keeper. Had Davis ran half way down the pitch and went back then it's run out, but as he just went out of his crease, it's stumped.
by MightyEagles » Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:21 pm
the joker wrote:well they are 1 for none
davis ran out by manou
by jackpot jim » Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:38 pm
by MightyEagles » Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:42 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Official match attendance 1,503
by Adelaide Hawk » Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:04 pm
MightyEagles wrote:the joker wrote:well they are 1 for none
davis ran out by manou
It was Stumped as Manou is a keeper. Had Davis ran half way down the pitch and went back then it's run out, but as he just went out of his crease, it's stumped.
by Pag » Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:55 pm
They had to finish it today to get the one-dayer in on Sunday.MightyEagles wrote:jackpot jim wrote:Official match attendance 1,503
Given that the match was during the week cost the SACA about 500 people. Not that it's the SACA's fault, they don't pick when the matches are on.
by brod » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:07 pm
Pag wrote:They had to finish it today to get the one-dayer in on Sunday.MightyEagles wrote:jackpot jim wrote:Official match attendance 1,503
Given that the match was during the week cost the SACA about 500 people. Not that it's the SACA's fault, they don't pick when the matches are on.
by Bob Loblaw » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:27 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:MightyEagles wrote:the joker wrote:well they are 1 for none
davis ran out by manou
It was Stumped as Manou is a keeper. Had Davis ran half way down the pitch and went back then it's run out, but as he just went out of his crease, it's stumped.
Correct. You have to be attempting a run to be given run out.
by Tassie Blues » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:39 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Official match attendance 1,503
by rod_rooster » Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:04 pm
Bob Loblaw wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:MightyEagles wrote:the joker wrote:well they are 1 for none
davis ran out by manou
It was Stumped as Manou is a keeper. Had Davis ran half way down the pitch and went back then it's run out, but as he just went out of his crease, it's stumped.
Correct. You have to be attempting a run to be given run out.
so if you're batting out of your crease, hit the ball to silly mid off and before you can get back in your crease he the throws the stumps down, you're suggesting this is a stumping?
by jackpot jim » Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:54 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Bob Loblaw wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:MightyEagles wrote:
It was Stumped as Manou is a keeper. Had Davis ran half way down the pitch and went back then it's run out, but as he just went out of his crease, it's stumped.
Correct. You have to be attempting a run to be given run out.
so if you're batting out of your crease, hit the ball to silly mid off and before you can get back in your crease he the throws the stumps down, you're suggesting this is a stumping?
A stumping has to be performed by the wicket keeper. If the batsman is not attempting a run and the wicket keeper breaks the stumps then it is stumped. If any other fieldsman breaks the stumps then it is run out.
by rod_rooster » Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:58 pm
by Grahaml » Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:17 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:40 am
jackpot jim wrote:[quote="rod_rooster
Correct. You have to be attempting a run to be given run out.
by matt » Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:51 am
by Texas Rattlesnake » Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:13 pm
by Stumps » Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:26 pm
matt wrote:Ridiculous indeed by Davis.
A long, long time ago in year 6 cricket our keeper had a ping as the batsman wandered out of his crease. He missed the stumps but the non-striker had turned his back and was pfaffing about and was run out as the ball rolled up the other end.
P*ss funny.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |