by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:39 pm
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:46 pm
by Choccies » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:54 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:boozehound wrote:No there was no footy trip. No altercations at the grand final after party either..
I was referring to Golden Grove there BH.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:58 pm
Choccies wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:boozehound wrote:No there was no footy trip. No altercations at the grand final after party either..
I was referring to Golden Grove there BH.
Yep LM. There was. No-one associated with the club though, both the attacker and receiver, just some young losers who brought a previous dispute to the clubrooms and almost spoilt a good night. As for teh footy trip, I haven't heard any details yet so cant comment
by Choccies » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:02 pm
by finn » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:41 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Yep, you city boys need to stop whinging about shared showers. If you can't leave it on the field you shouldn't play.
Keen Observer probably leaves his jocks on in the shower like we used to do in junior colts.
by The Big Shrek » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:06 pm
finn wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Yep, you city boys need to stop whinging about shared showers. If you can't leave it on the field you shouldn't play.
Keen Observer probably leaves his jocks on in the shower like we used to do in junior colts.
whatever shrek. was only asking because last time I played there one of our blokes got kinghit in the showers by an ep player who obviously didn't leave it on the ground. thought that the league had asked them to separate the showers post that incident.
by Dogsbreath » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:25 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:finn wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Yep, you city boys need to stop whinging about shared showers. If you can't leave it on the field you shouldn't play.
Keen Observer probably leaves his jocks on in the shower like we used to do in junior colts.
whatever shrek. was only asking because last time I played there one of our blokes got kinghit in the showers by an ep player who obviously didn't leave it on the ground. thought that the league had asked them to separate the showers post that incident.
Calm down, finn. The remark was made in jest. You can't blame the shared facilities for that kind of incident. He could just have likely had kinghit him in the club, carpark or elsewhere. When you start to sanitise football clubs like that soon they will make the spectators sit apart, have different carparks etc. I would argue that having the shared showers avoids animosity by forcing opposition players together. It's a lot harder to hate someone once you've had a chat with them.
by GFP » Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:15 pm
by Dogsbreath » Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:16 pm
GFP wrote:Rule number 1 in the mens fighting handbook:
If both you and the guy you want to punch are naked - save the aggression until you at least have some jocks on to stop any unwanted wang touching.
by zedman » Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:52 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Yep, you city boys need to stop whinging about shared showers. If you can't leave it on the field you shouldn't play.
Keen Observer probably leaves his jocks on in the shower like we used to do in junior colts.
by carey18 » Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:47 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:56 am
Dogsbreath wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:finn wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Yep, you city boys need to stop whinging about shared showers. If you can't leave it on the field you shouldn't play.
Keen Observer probably leaves his jocks on in the shower like we used to do in junior colts.
whatever shrek. was only asking because last time I played there one of our blokes got kinghit in the showers by an ep player who obviously didn't leave it on the ground. thought that the league had asked them to separate the showers post that incident.
Calm down, finn. The remark was made in jest. You can't blame the shared facilities for that kind of incident. He could just have likely had kinghit him in the club, carpark or elsewhere. When you start to sanitise football clubs like that soon they will make the spectators sit apart, have different carparks etc. I would argue that having the shared showers avoids animosity by forcing opposition players together. It's a lot harder to hate someone once you've had a chat with them.
Since your sharing showers instead of punching you could suggest sword fights!!![]()
by emerson » Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:52 pm
by carey » Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:02 pm
DemonGirl wrote:Gator-Aid wrote:DemonGirl wrote:Tigers93-94 wrote:rumour has it there was an altercation betwenn 2 players, a bit of push and shove then a couple more come in to calm it down. This resulted in the B&F walking out and publically stating he will not play again at EP.
This is from what I have heard - it is second hand though so treat with caution
thats pretty much what happened. it was quite ridiculous actually the night ended rather early...
You guys better stop picking on Salis West from now on if that behaviour continues.
Well im hoping we have now got rid of these idiots. we dont need ppl like that around the place
by The Big Shrek » Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:57 pm
emerson wrote:So it's now official. Edwardstown will be going to the southern league. SMOSH have decided to go to Div 3 next year anyway and now Scotch OC have the choice if they want to stay in Div 2....... Interesting. Can SMOSH people pls tell me why you would want to go back to Div 3??
by Footy Chick » Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:01 pm
by The Big Shrek » Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:03 pm
Footy Chick wrote:I thought Champion was their best defender last year, he'll be missed. Nothing a few Sturt fringe players won't fix though
by emerson » Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:12 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |