by beeroclock » Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:35 pm
by beeroclock » Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:40 pm
Pumba wrote:beeroclock wrote:Lo grades are for 1 inning games so leave it,simple,blokes that have to leave early give skippers insentive to go for outrights,less wickets to take,toughen up A.T.C.A and clubs involved or we will end up being a pethetic 1 day comp down the track.
what do you consider to be so pathetic about the one day (LO) comp? is it because it is a weak competition or do u dislike the short version?
by Pumba » Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:16 pm
beeroclock wrote:Pumba wrote:beeroclock wrote:Lo grades are for 1 inning games so leave it,simple,blokes that have to leave early give skippers insentive to go for outrights,less wickets to take,toughen up A.T.C.A and clubs involved or we will end up being a pethetic 1 day comp down the track.
what do you consider to be so pathetic about the one day (LO) comp? is it because it is a weak competition or do u dislike the short version?
Dont think anybody would like to see prem grade one dayers mate,that would be pathetic,understand where im coming from now Pumpa?
by beeroclock » Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:59 pm
by catchisthecry » Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:09 pm
by Pumba » Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:38 pm
by tedbullpit » Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:43 pm
Pumba wrote:apparently the fixtures will be posted tomorrow for all turf circket
by tedbullpit » Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:26 am
by Pumba » Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:41 am
by tedbullpit » Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:49 am
Pumba wrote:what do you think of it ted, or others, from your clubs point of view?
by beeroclock » Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:13 pm
by Pumba » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:58 am
by Bold Strategy » Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:32 pm
Pumba wrote:can anyone shed some light on the state of the lower LO comps? standard wise and in general
by rod_rooster » Fri Sep 26, 2008 1:25 pm
Bold Strategy wrote:Pumba wrote:can anyone shed some light on the state of the lower LO comps? standard wise and in general
ive played an occasional match of LODs, you have players with different ability, good teams will have a couple of good players that could play in the club B, C or even A grade but want to play 1 dayers. And then you get you 1st year players, There some big wins each round. It still played pretty seriously thou. I played a match of LOA and that match was alot less organized and serious then LOD and standard was only a bit higher.
by Bold Strategy » Fri Sep 26, 2008 1:34 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Bold Strategy wrote:Pumba wrote:can anyone shed some light on the state of the lower LO comps? standard wise and in general
ive played an occasional match of LODs, you have players with different ability, good teams will have a couple of good players that could play in the club B, C or even A grade but want to play 1 dayers. And then you get you 1st year players, There some big wins each round. It still played pretty seriously thou. I played a match of LOA and that match was alot less organized and serious then LOD and standard was only a bit higher.
I can assure you that the standard of LOA is so far ahead of LOD it isn't even worth comparing.
by Shark_Hunter » Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:03 pm
by bulldogs » Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:41 pm
Shark_Hunter wrote:Anyone hear how Grange have ended up for this season? 've heard Higgins, Bell, Whitehouse, Modra and others have retired...
AHOS have done well to keep Parko and Ozolins, also picked up a keeper from southern districts. We're looking forward to a good year at AHOS, especially if Rainbow Warrior decides to bowl QUICK!
by ray borner » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:41 am
Shark_Hunter wrote:Anyone hear how Grange have ended up for this season? 've heard Higgins, Bell, Whitehouse, Modra and others have retired...
AHOS have done well to keep Parko and Ozolins, also picked up a keeper from southern districts. We're looking forward to a good year at AHOS, especially if Rainbow Warrior decides to bowl QUICK!
by Pumba » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |