by Rik E Boy » Fri May 30, 2008 8:26 pm
by locky801 » Fri May 30, 2008 9:29 pm
the joker wrote:only one change for test tonight.
Hodge out Clarke in
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 31, 2008 12:56 am
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 31, 2008 1:04 am
by spell_check » Sat May 31, 2008 1:55 am
by spell_check » Sat May 31, 2008 1:56 am
by spell_check » Sat May 31, 2008 2:04 am
by spell_check » Sat May 31, 2008 2:32 am
by mal » Sat May 31, 2008 2:36 am
by locky801 » Sat May 31, 2008 6:33 am
by locky801 » Sat May 31, 2008 6:59 am
by locky801 » Sat May 31, 2008 7:04 am
by Blue Boy » Sat May 31, 2008 9:57 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Wash yer mouth out 7 off the first eight balls. The Kat to redeem himself in this test.
regards,
REB
by hearts on fire » Sat May 31, 2008 11:53 am
mal wrote:LUNCH
AU 1/70
KAT 24*
PONTING 28*
Australia win the toss and bet[gee that seems to happen more often than not]
Looks like a tame pitch
Slow outfield
Late start
My prediction at STUMPS if they play out the day
AU 4/258
PUNTER and the KAT to make big scores,
CLARK to fail, WI have a good record v Pup [hope im wrong ]
____________________
9967 PONTING
10196 MAL
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 31, 2008 11:57 am
the joker wrote:the big qustion is about who will get dropped now Katich or Hodge who batted alot better than katich in the first test
THIS IS MY TEAM
Jaques
Hussey
Ponting
Hodge
Clarke
Symonds
Haddin
Lee
Johnson
clark
Macgill
bollinger 12th
by norm11 » Sat May 31, 2008 12:00 pm
by the joker » Sat May 31, 2008 12:07 pm
just because they picked that team does not mean that huss wouldnt have got runs opening and that hodge wouldnt get 100Rik E Boy wrote:the joker wrote:the big qustion is about who will get dropped now Katich or Hodge who batted alot better than katich in the first test
THIS IS MY TEAM
Jaques
Hussey
Ponting
Hodge
Clarke
Symonds
Haddin
Lee
Johnson
clark
Macgill
bollinger 12th
Glad you're not a selector.![]()
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 31, 2008 12:26 pm
by the joker » Sat May 31, 2008 1:02 pm
we should just drop all the all the people who are not from NSW and just let them be our international team.Rik E Boy wrote:Boys, most of you should stick to the footy. About 70 percent of you have written off a bloke who has come off a record amount of runs in the toughest domestic league in the world because he failed in a test with hardly any time in the middle since the Moo Moo final, just because he isn't as good as Hayden or Langer.
Well, newsflash people, we aren't going to see another Hayden or Langer for quite some time as those blokes were the most (or one of the most I'll leave the stats to someone who DOES know what they are talking about in spelly) successfull opening combinations in test history. It is time to judge some of these newer players on their on merits and give them a chance. Posters who are suggesting a high rotation of players through the national side are clearly too young to remember the 1980's when we were at our lowest point in 130 odd years of Test history.
SAFootynets Test Cricket 'Little Shop of horrors'
One poster who bags Katich is a Shane Watson fan LMFAO.
More than one suggestion for an out of form Mike Hussey to open the innings.
One poster suggesting that if Cosi wasn't fat he'd be in the national side. Er..no, you need concentration and technique as well.
Suggestions that young Phil Hughes be elevated at the expense of the Kat. We are number one because we cook our cricketers in the shield until they are ready and even though the kid can play he isn't ready just yet.
A poster who says there is a massive gap between Shield and Test cricket yet the Windies are carp.
Someone else wants Shaun Marsh. A promising player but he doesn't have the runs on the board like The Kat or Hodge (who is not one my 'pets').
Someone complaining about run rates in test cricket LOL.
Let's drop the Kat - he's had one test to prove himself even though he made runs in middle order, not as an opener.
Lets open with Watson, include Marsh and go in with no spinners. Might as well call ourselves South Africa. England would applaud this move.
Beau Casson in the 12.
Another poster suggesting that it had been proven that neither Hodge or Katich were up to test standard. I'd hate to have that poster in a jury!
There is no doubt that the Kat is an ugly batsman to watch with a technique that is all of his own but he is very effective and CAN PLAY in the longer form of the game. If the Aussies put him back at the top order of a one dayer I won't be happy with that but Katich has clearly earned his stripes. Hodge, a player I can't stand (and I'm not sure why but hey least I can admit it - I still reckon he's suspect against spin) is also good enough to play Test cricket and we must judge them based on results AND opportunities that have been provided to earn those results.
Even though we are online and anyone can 'join in the fun' (and it has been fun this morning ha ha) we can get very insulated on SAFooty.net. If you were to repeat any of the pearls of wisdom above in garbage green on a site with an international audience such as C4 you would cop such a severe flaming it would pale in comparision to what I will cop if the Kat finishes the series with three straight donuts LOL.
The year of the Kat continues!!. For those of you who do know what are you are talking about, you know who you are.![]()
regards,
REB
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |