mrf wrote:Yeah Wes is from Pt Lincoln
did he play for Marion or Harndorf? Last I heard he was getting a clearance for Encounter Bay? Very handy player, have played against him the last 2 seasons down here
by City Mad Hustler » Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:38 pm
mrf wrote:Yeah Wes is from Pt Lincoln
by mrf » Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:59 pm
by ronburgandy » Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:17 pm
lovetotalkfooty wrote:boozehound wrote:LTTF- Holy cow....only five goals in all grades...Is that indicitive of how poor Christies are or a reflection on the standard of the league???
i think it is a mixture of alot of things. christies playing younger guys to see how they handle bigger bodies, playing guys out of position to see if anybody can stand up and maybe find a few options for the season, the old faithful, players missing and also playing a well drilled, well coached team that move the ball with percision and pace. Mt lofty are a team that just run in numbers.
As for the other grades it may have been a lack of numbers and depth. A lot of kids just stuggling with a quick tempo that mt lofty play.
I would think that christies will be alot better this week and will be more competitive and should be able to play finally a full strength squad this week and look to round 1 against norlunga.
As for the league i think it like comparing apple and oranges. Hills is a quick, play on running game where SFL seems to be more bang and crash pack style of footy. Before people get fired up its just a observation
by bickle » Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:28 pm
by Panther32 » Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:38 pm
i dont no much about the quality of the lower teams in the sfl but christies would hav to be bottom 4. lofty were close to full strength with about 5 players out including ruckman and played 3 of the bench. christies had 4 on the bench and after half time the runner pulled on a guernsey. chrisites looked very unfit and i predict could be a long year. they did however look like they had enough numbers for both a and b grade which is a good sign if there are a few injuries.
by tatts » Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:24 pm
KEYDEFENDER wrote:Swooper16 wrote:Who are these taller types KD? That was probably the only thing Brighton were lacking last season so if they have recruited a couple of quality bigs then they will take some beating in 08.
Swoop, not from last years side
Statham
Brookman
and 2 other younger kids I had not seen before but over 6 2"
and Pethick (played some early games last year)
by petoe » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:20 pm
by lion heart » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:29 pm
KEYDEFENDER wrote:Swooper16 wrote:Who are these taller types KD? That was probably the only thing Brighton were lacking last season so if they have recruited a couple of quality bigs then they will take some beating in 08.
Swoop, not from last years side
Statham
![]()
Brookman
and 2 other younger kids I had not seen before but over 6 2"
and Pethick (played some early games last year)
by sportsfan » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:37 pm
by lion heart » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:49 pm
rodney fox wrote:I don't think this has anything to do with arrogance. I was not only relating to this particular speech but also for the way Lonsdale held themselves over the entire day. I listened in on half time breaks and feel in some cases it works to try and out muscle your opponent, I just think they got shown thats not the way footy is especially in a 20/20 situation.
I watched several times as cheap shots that have come from well known Lonsdale players not only in one game but many. As it points out they did play some better footy throughout the day and well done. But with only managing one draw it shows that the way the game is meant to be played quick and skillful not thuggish could not help Lonsdales style of play at all and is why Aldinga and others were beneficial with not getting dragged into that crap. Everyones got an opinion and I to am very interested with the season games.
I guess some ppl on here will never lighten to the fact that Aldinga are adapting to the league even if it does take a long time to come, its all for the best.
by rodney fox » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:59 am
by KEYDEFENDER » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:42 am
tatts wrote:KEYDEFENDER wrote:Swooper16 wrote:Who are these taller types KD? That was probably the only thing Brighton were lacking last season so if they have recruited a couple of quality bigs then they will take some beating in 08.
Swoop, not from last years side
Statham
Brookman
and 2 other younger kids I had not seen before but over 6 2"
and Pethick (played some early games last year)
Brookman is a good quality ruckman and statham is quality also with a fair bit of league experience
Which Pethick are we talking about ? Although they are all good footballers
by Panther32 » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:53 am
Panther32 wrote:Cheese Twisties wrote:Also was told that Reynella smashed Tailem Bend, my mate saying Ben Moore played and looked every bit the ex-AFL player player and was a cut above the rest.
Any Reynella players got any info on the Tailem Bend game? Were they good in any positions, etc?
by Shake 'n Bake » Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:43 am
Panther32 wrote:Panther32 wrote:Cheese Twisties wrote:Also was told that Reynella smashed Tailem Bend, my mate saying Ben Moore played and looked every bit the ex-AFL player player and was a cut above the rest.
Any Reynella players got any info on the Tailem Bend game? Were they good in any positions, etc?
I heard that Tailem have a ruckman the size of Arnold Schwarzenegger!!! Any Reynella players/supporters care to confirm this?
by ronburgandy » Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:53 pm
burglar wrote:i dont no much about the quality of the lower teams in the sfl but christies would hav to be bottom 4. lofty were close to full strength with about 5 players out including ruckman and played 3 of the bench. christies had 4 on the bench and after half time the runner pulled on a guernsey. chrisites looked very unfit and i predict could be a long year. they did however look like they had enough numbers for both a and b grade which is a good sign if there are a few injuries.
by ronburgandy » Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Panther32 wrote:i dont no much about the quality of the lower teams in the sfl but christies would hav to be bottom 4. lofty were close to full strength with about 5 players out including ruckman and played 3 of the bench. christies had 4 on the bench and after half time the runner pulled on a guernsey. chrisites looked very unfit and i predict could be a long year. they did however look like they had enough numbers for both a and b grade which is a good sign if there are a few injuries.
Are you talking you and your team up already Ron??? How much could you have seriously contributed from the bench...or was it the bar???
by Panther32 » Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:26 pm
ronburgandy wrote:Panther32 wrote:i dont no much about the quality of the lower teams in the sfl but christies would hav to be bottom 4. lofty were close to full strength with about 5 players out including ruckman and played 3 of the bench. christies had 4 on the bench and after half time the runner pulled on a guernsey. chrisites looked very unfit and i predict could be a long year. they did however look like they had enough numbers for both a and b grade which is a good sign if there are a few injuries.
Are you talking you and your team up already Ron??? How much could you have seriously contributed from the bench...or was it the bar???
only the super b's panther32. and u really need to update panther32 now ur 33! ha ha. see that you got in the best champ. obviously there trying to justify the $$$$$$$ ur on! lol
by BiGfOoT SaSqUaTcH » Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:49 pm
by Morphies Magic » Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:07 pm
by The Big Shrek » Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:15 pm
Morphies Magic wrote:Has any one seen Morphy Parks play?
From what i have seen they will not finish bottom this year, they look a hard running side that will crack into the finals this season?
Thoughts everyboy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |