McAlmanac wrote:spell_check wrote:McAlmanac wrote:spell_check wrote:Roger Woodcock: 267 games 602 goals
Michael Graham: 282 games 455 goals
Ralph Sewer: 382 games 471 goals
Do you have State game comparison? I don't reckon Roger got a guernsey.
You're spot on, he didn't get one.
Graham represented SA 11 times, Sewer 12.
So there you go. Woodcock was a soft, one-sided, hungry hungry hippo who couldn't be trusted to face the Vics.

I just wanted to respond to this misconception that Roger Woodcock was a one-sided player. The truth is he had skills both sides but was able to maneuver to his left so successfully that he was rarely forced to go onto his right side .. a little like Buddy Franklin at the Hawks who reminds me so much of Woodcock when he runs across (and slightly away from) goal and then curls the ball back over his right shoulder for a goal. All class.
Craig Cock tells the story when he had this "Woodcock only turns onto his left foot" notion rammed down his throat so much that he would over-compensate, causing Woodcock to bend back onto his right foot. He kicked 5 goals that day, 3 of them with his right foot.
There is this other notion that Woodcock was soft and never won a hard ball. Once again, that's a fallacy. Once again, his role wasn't to win the hard ball, it was to receive and turn the ball to Norwood's advantage. He took many hard blows over the years only to get back up and keep playing. There's no such thing as a soft league footballer.
Woodcock? What I wouldn't give to have a 25 year old Woodcock runnning around at Norwood in 2008.
