stan wrote:Dean Jones had the best way to fix this. Down the pub over a few beers, if Harbi turned in to prick like normal then the boys and head outside and punch on. Would solve the problem!
Don't need that, remember what happened in Vic.,
by locky801 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:24 pm
stan wrote:Dean Jones had the best way to fix this. Down the pub over a few beers, if Harbi turned in to prick like normal then the boys and head outside and punch on. Would solve the problem!
by GWW » Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:55 pm
Mr66 wrote:ICC = Imbecilic Council of Cowards
by bulldogproud » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:04 pm
by locky801 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:20 pm
bulldogproud wrote:According to the ABC News, the ICC really had no choice. Cricket Australia withdrew the charge of racial vilification themselves, downgrading it to abusive language . Not sure if that was reported correctly, but that is what ABC News stated.
Cheers
by bulldogproud » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:23 pm
by Mr66 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:30 pm
GWW wrote:Mr66 wrote:ICC = Imbecilic Council of Cowards
I can think of a better word starting with "C"
by westozfalcon » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:43 pm
by Dirko » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:48 pm
westozfalcon wrote:Justice John Hansen from New Zealand, an experienced judge and completely independant arbiter has made his decision on all the evidence presented.
There should be no reason to suggest that he did not make the correct ruling.
by Hondo » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:16 pm
hondo71 wrote: I wonder if we would have been spared all this drama if the match referee had taken his foot of the penalty pedal a bit at the time
by locky801 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:07 pm
by Dirko » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:24 pm
locky801 wrote:Oh dear it doesn't get any better, now an apology from the powers to be of World Cricket stating they forgot to produce similar fact evidence of Singhs previous behaviour record to the appeal Judge, forgot or just didn't want to bring it up, still reckon this all has a very bad smell to it all
by redden whites » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:34 pm
by locky801 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:03 pm
redden whites wrote:That would not be evidence .It may affect a sentence but not the outcome of the charge.
.
by Dirko » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:31 pm
redden whites wrote:That would not be evidence .It may affect a sentence but not the outcome of the charge.
The man was found not guilty ....staggering reading here
Delighted though by all the" I support black people" idealism .I am thinking of an official apology to the stolen generation SAfooty petition and maybe a Native title petition as well as everyone is so deeply concerned about our countrymen of black skin.
by redden whites » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:33 pm
SJABC wrote:redden whites wrote:That would not be evidence .It may affect a sentence but not the outcome of the charge.
The man was found not guilty ....staggering reading here
Delighted though by all the" I support black people" idealism .I am thinking of an official apology to the stolen generation SAfooty petition and maybe a Native title petition as well as everyone is so deeply concerned about our countrymen of black skin.
WTF? the point is, is that Singh said it. He didn't refute that.
by locky801 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:44 pm
by bulldogproud » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:02 pm
by sasquatch » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:51 pm
GWW wrote:Mr66 wrote:ICC = Imbecilic Council of Cowards
I can think of a better word starting with "C"
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |