Punk Rooster wrote:What rubbish. Neither club had anything to play for, why not give a bloke like that some satisfaction? Both very unique situations. Your point would be valid if WT were playing for a spot in the 5, & played Scruff because he was 1 short of 200.1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Aerie wrote:Ian Hanna's last goal for West Torrens in the last game against Woodville at Adelaide Oval. After coming back from a broken neck and being allowed to sit on the bench in that last game so he could get his 200th and life membership (he was in no fit state to play), he came onto the ground in the last quarter and caught a Woodville player holding the ball in the goal square. Jumped up and down and shook his fists with joy before slotting through the goal. For that small moment all else was forgotten and I will never forget that piece of play.
Without wishing to sound detrimental to Ian Hanna, That bit of prose proves why Glenelg can be considered to be a better club than West Torrens. Weak clubs rely on sentiment and individual achievements to create their history. Strong clubs look back on team performances in grand finals to determine theirs....
Missing my point Punky, I have no problems playing Ian Hanna in that scenario, and good on West Torrens for that, my point is people using sentiment and individualism to creat club culture "or reminisce on great pieces of play". Successful clubs draw on inspiration from achievement and deeds in important matches especially GFs.
Look at the posts from the majority of posters on this thread, the majority of great plays are in GFs or major round matches.
Surely in 1980 or 1978 for Aerie their may have been some great pieces of play to get Torrens into the finals that he can draw inspiration from.