Leaping Lindner wrote:This was talked about on ABC radio the other day (774 here in Melbourne). The figure I recall hearing was 22%. Interest rates were artifcially capped and it was only after the Hawke government deregulated interest rates that it stopped.
FWIW I don't recall interest rates ever reaching 17% under a Keating government. I remember they did under Hawke for (what?) 3 months, but then again housing was more affordable then.
A quick google found this.......
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/conten ... 085320.htm
Hmm... lots of assertions there which may be true or half-true. I vaguely recall that in the mid 1970s my bank did try to lend me money to buy property in North Adelaide half throught the bank and half through their finance company, but offering to talk to another bank pulled them into line. That tends to support what you say about the capping.
The 17% peaks were under Whitlam, then under Hawke/Keating in 1987 - I'm not sure which of them was PM that year - I used 90 day bills then as they were cheaper at 14.6% - but I recall I used them for 5-6 months until I'd developed and sold that property - and made 30% on it due to inflation. I think I would have switched to a normal loan if it had become cheaper to do so.
Inflation was up both times too. The house I built in 1971 for $19000 brought $45000 in late 1975, and the place I bought in 1976 for $60,000 was valued at $57,000 in 1980 and $64,000 in late 1983 but got $138,000 in early 1985. It was 1987 I sold the Porsche I bought [secondhand] in 1984 for 40% more than I had paid for it, while my sister's share portfolio plummetted 40%. I enjoyed that because she had chided me about buying a Porsche instead of making "sensible" investments.

Record Lows:
Leaping Lindner wrote:Once again they were talking about this the other day on 774. It was on Jon Faine's morning show, and the (TV) ad went to air for only three days during the last election. It was pulled off the air after this time by Howard himself. Presumably even he thought this was "gilding the lily".
Jon Faine can be a real pain at times, but the one thing he does do is his research, especially on political matters, and especially at election time. His lack of appearances on Media Watch are testimony to that.![]()
It was actually on his show (not AM or the World Today), so there doesn't appear to be a transcript on the web.
I agree with your comments about Jon Faine. I didn't see those advertisements but I guess it is possible someone less astute in the Liberal Party authorised advertisements that Howard pulled out when he realised they had done so, because it was something that couldn't be promised or defended and something he didn't intend to say.. There are always idiots who go over the top and embarrass the leadership - Kevin Rudd has had a few to silence in the last few weeks.
Leaping Lindner wrote:Personally I can't believe there is still two weeks left of this carry on. I want Susie Creamcheese of The Happy Birthday Party to make a comeback. He/she would get my vote!![]()
(There's one to test the memory of older posters. Think 1972 Federal election for the seat of Sturt!)
My wife knew Paul Paech [alias Susie] at university. I once met Bobby McLeay - one of Sir John's sons who used to call himself "the red sheep of the family". I agree elections are a pain, full of subtle distortions and outright lies paraded as fact, and despite being a member of the Liberal Party I would like to see the end of party based politics - how is another big debate though.....