by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:07 am
by Andy #24 » Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:21 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Rooster, I'm pretty certain you'd never recruit a bloke who wasn't available for a GF too...
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:23 am
by Andy #24 » Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:51 am
by Drop Bear » Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:45 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Rooster, I'm pretty certain you'd never recruit a bloke who wasn't available for a GF too...
by Andy #24 » Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:51 pm
Drop Bear wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Rooster, I'm pretty certain you'd never recruit a bloke who wasn't available for a GF too...
That sort of s***t's not even worth commenting on.
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:02 pm
by The Rooster » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:25 pm
by torp » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:27 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:34 pm
by torp » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:35 pm
united! no salary cap and no import rules will stop the from getting what they want. a brides maids dress!Drop Bear wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Rooster, I'm pretty certain you'd never recruit a bloke who wasn't available for a GF too...
That sort of s***t's not even worth commenting on.
by torp » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:48 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I'm not sure that The Rooster did resort to name calling there....
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:49 pm
torp wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I'm not sure that The Rooster did resort to name calling there....
you peanut you boneheadDW a moderator.
![]()
![]()
by torp » Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:59 pm
page 51 if you can read?Dogwatcher wrote:torp wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I'm not sure that The Rooster did resort to name calling there....
you peanut you boneheadDW a moderator.
![]()
![]()
Well you tell me where the name calling was in that post then....
by The Real Number 3 » Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:08 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:10 pm
The Rooster wrote:You'd be right Doggie, But what sort of bloke wouldn't want to play or would make himself un-available for GF, Che wasn't alone, doesn't matter really the dust has cleared and they are fine with their recruits i'm sure.
And i haven't read the Bunyip lately (I gave up after some of the harsh critism of Tommy Dawkins) but good luck and honestly best wishes to Greg Phillips, it is for all intents and purposes the biggest coup since well,,last year when wangas slotted a lazy eight.
But i hope that Greg brings all of his enthusiasm and energy with him as we might not all like the rams, we want a strong comp and if this helps them be more competitive all the better.
Had a dream about Erin Phillips once, but that's probably best posted on another website
torp wrote:HEY ROOSTER got anything better than name calling. TW footy club a joke![]()
![]()
by The Rooster » Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 pm
by mighty hounds » Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:23 pm
Start wrote:I doudt very much that Two Wells will move forward, they lack any professionalism and direction...really they are under achievers and shown nothimg but!!
Torp I agree with you mate, Janson a very underated player for Two Wells, but TW continues to chase the wrong people.
by Start » Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:29 pm
by The Rooster » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:18 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |