macdog3 wrote:yeah i play for South Gawler
Number 3 Jake McVicar
by Brad Man » Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:56 pm
macdog3 wrote:yeah i play for South Gawler
by macdog3 » Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:58 pm
by Brad Man » Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:00 pm
macdog3 wrote:no, someone else on here asked me the same question! i know him though..
how do you know him?
by macdog3 » Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:02 pm
by Brad Man » Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:03 pm
macdog3 wrote:i wish i was number 7 for South...what a gun!
by macdog3 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:04 am
by Brad Man » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:28 am
macdog3 wrote:should have been, probably Prokopec as well
by Pag » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:24 pm
Brad Man wrote:macdog3 wrote:should have been, probably Prokopec as well
Take Parrish out for him, and O'Connor should be the Coach................. I still think you are Jake, If you are i have had some dealing with your Dad over the years, Good Bloke.
by Brad Man » Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:10 pm
Pag wrote:Brad Man wrote:macdog3 wrote:should have been, probably Prokopec as well
Take Parrish out for him, and O'Connor should be the Coach................. I still think you are Jake, If you are i have had some dealing with your Dad over the years, Good Bloke.
I asked that a while back as well, I made the 'mac' and '3' connection too...
by holden06 » Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:18 am
by holden06 » Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:20 am
by Pag » Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:39 am
Brad Man wrote:Pag wrote:Brad Man wrote:macdog3 wrote:should have been, probably Prokopec as well
Take Parrish out for him, and O'Connor should be the Coach................. I still think you are Jake, If you are i have had some dealing with your Dad over the years, Good Bloke.
I asked that a while back as well, I made the 'mac' and '3' connection too...
Pag, give me your import allocation for each of the BLG side, Mac 3 ( jake i think) and me seem to agree, your thoughts
by Brad Man » Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:49 pm
by Pag » Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:12 pm
by Brad Man » Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:31 pm
Pag wrote:I wouldn't want to see the standard dissolve either. I'd be interested to know the boundaries with Souths/Centrals/Willaston though.
Obviously population wise Freeling and Barossa have the advantage, and they're taking their chances. What about say if the league allowed for a certain amount of imports as a total number, say 45, which allows for 5 per team. And Population is probably isn't the best way to measure it, not everyone in the town is a 18-35 year old male who can play footy.
I think no matter what they do, every club is going to have its good and bad cycles. That's just how footy is.
by Brad Man » Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:37 pm
Brad Man wrote:Pag wrote:I wouldn't want to see the standard dissolve either. I'd be interested to know the boundaries with Souths/Centrals/Willaston though.
Obviously population wise Freeling and Barossa have the advantage, and they're taking their chances. What about say if the league allowed for a certain amount of imports as a total number, say 45, which allows for 5 per team. And Population is probably isn't the best way to measure it, not everyone in the town is a 18-35 year old male who can play footy.
I think no matter what they do, every club is going to have its good and bad cycles. That's just how footy is.
by Pag » Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:06 pm
Brad Man wrote:Brad Man wrote:Pag wrote:I wouldn't want to see the standard dissolve either. I'd be interested to know the boundaries with Souths/Centrals/Willaston though.
Obviously population wise Freeling and Barossa have the advantage, and they're taking their chances. What about say if the league allowed for a certain amount of imports as a total number, say 45, which allows for 5 per team. And Population is probably isn't the best way to measure it, not everyone in the town is a 18-35 year old male who can play footy.
I think no matter what they do, every club is going to have its good and bad cycles. That's just how footy is.
Pag, All teams in the BLG have the same boundry, It goes along Curtis Road (North of Smithfield) out behind Angle Vale to Two Wells. Basically if i lived in that area near Andrews Farm i am local for all teams, likewise if i lived in Riverton i am local for the Gawler sides.
by Brad Man » Sat Oct 06, 2007 6:31 pm
Pag wrote:Brad Man wrote:Brad Man wrote:Pag wrote:I wouldn't want to see the standard dissolve either. I'd be interested to know the boundaries with Souths/Centrals/Willaston though.
Obviously population wise Freeling and Barossa have the advantage, and they're taking their chances. What about say if the league allowed for a certain amount of imports as a total number, say 45, which allows for 5 per team. And Population is probably isn't the best way to measure it, not everyone in the town is a 18-35 year old male who can play footy.
I think no matter what they do, every club is going to have its good and bad cycles. That's just how footy is.
Pag, All teams in the BLG have the same boundry, It goes along Curtis Road (North of Smithfield) out behind Angle Vale to Two Wells. Basically if i lived in that area near Andrews Farm i am local for all teams, likewise if i lived in Riverton i am local for the Gawler sides.
I understand that mate, but if the league is measuring populations, what is the boundary that seperates, say Willaston and Gawler Central, to measure population?
by Dogwatcher » Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:10 pm
by Pag » Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:35 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |