by TEX07 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:27 pm
by Yank Man » Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:36 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:43 pm
TEX07 wrote:If the AFL allow this all to go through but then in a year or so take away the COLA from the Swans they are going to make it pretty tough to stay within the cap. If they agree to it would it mean that they would hav to give the COLA for at least the full contract?
by daysofourlives » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:27 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Seems the AFL might be stepping in now
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-is-prepared-to-block-sydneys-nine-year-10-million-offer-for-lance-franklin/story-fni5fan7-1226731187698
can sdomeone please tell me how they can????? we haven't broken any rules!!!
by daysofourlives » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:29 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:TEX07 wrote:If the AFL allow this all to go through but then in a year or so take away the COLA from the Swans they are going to make it pretty tough to stay within the cap. If they agree to it would it mean that they would hav to give the COLA for at least the full contract?
Yes.
by daysofourlives » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:33 pm
Dissident wrote:Restricted free agency should be removed from the vocabulary.
It won't exist in the AFL.
Your'e either a free agent, or you're not a free agent. This isn't the NBA (or other sports for that matter)
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:58 pm
by rod_rooster » Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:09 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Poor dool. Couple of cents short of the dollar aren't you.
by Hondo » Thu Oct 03, 2013 8:36 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:TEX07 wrote:If the AFL allow this all to go through but then in a year or so take away the COLA from the Swans they are going to make it pretty tough to stay within the cap. If they agree to it would it mean that they would hav to give the COLA for at least the full contract?
Yes.
by gutterboy » Thu Oct 03, 2013 8:42 am
by bickle » Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:17 am
by Dissident » Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:18 am
gutterboy wrote:does anyone know when the 2014 draw will be released?
by Trader » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:22 am
daysofourlives wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Seems the AFL might be stepping in now
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-is-prepared-to-block-sydneys-nine-year-10-million-offer-for-lance-franklin/story-fni5fan7-1226731187698
can sdomeone please tell me how they can????? we haven't broken any rules!!!
Its called bringing the game into disrepute mate, you should know that, thats the rule that covers any rules that we dont have that we want to have. You know it makes sense.
But the jist of it is if Franklin retires after 5 years then you must pay him out in one year within your salary cap, which is obviously impossible to do. The AFL will not let you put yourselves in this position.
by Hondo » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:29 am
by PatowalongaPirate » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:30 am
daysofourlives wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Seems the AFL might be stepping in now
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-is-prepared-to-block-sydneys-nine-year-10-million-offer-for-lance-franklin/story-fni5fan7-1226731187698
can sdomeone please tell me how they can????? we haven't broken any rules!!!
Its called bringing the game into disrepute mate, you should know that, thats the rule that covers any rules that we dont have that we want to have. You know it makes sense.
But the jist of it is if Franklin retires after 5 years then you must pay him out in one year within your salary cap, which is obviously impossible to do. The AFL will not let you put yourselves in this position.
by Trader » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:30 am
Hondo wrote:It's not hard so long as Buddy agrees to wait for his money even though he isn't playing.
Probably unlikely
by Booney » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:32 am
Hondo wrote:It's not hard so long as Buddy agrees to wait for his money even though he isn't playing.
Probably unlikely
by whufc » Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:45 pm
by daysofourlives » Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:53 pm
whufc wrote:The easiest solution for the AFL would have been to have a rule that states players can't get a contract longer than (5) years etc etc, would stop this issue from ever coming up.
They won't though because the AFL want to be able to manipulate every aspect of the game to suit there business needs ala if it was a 9 year deal to the GWS it wouldn't even be looked at, to the point if buddy retired early the AFL would have paid out his contract and freed the GWS salary up
by whufc » Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |