UK Fan wrote:
A) SANFL clubs want players drafted we get $$$$$
B) weve lost giles to gws Coad to Gold Coast skipworth to bendigo via players being offered money to be top up players in vfl.
Let us not forget your years of scaremongering about loss of players when Gc and gws joined. When an extra 100 players were required !!! SANFL will be less of comp via player raids.
Give it up mate!!
Ie another maccaism - misguided forecast of doom and gloom for our comp .
Youve completely misread my point. Not that im surprised.[/quote]
Sure we have mate!!!
Please fill us in on your latest unrealistic doom and gloom scenario for the SANFL . YAWNS!!![/quote]
I've already said my point.
A legitimate AFL reserves competition will mean bigger lists for AFL clubs. Either through more players on the senior list, bigger rookie lists, or some sort of supplementary list system. If clubs have to up their list by 8-10 players each, which to cover for injuries you'd think would be the case, thats 140-180 players not currently in the AFL system.
The upkeep will come from AFL delistees (which effects the SANFL, less recruits in), other state leagues and of course the SANFL. I think it will come from more players like Kane Mitchell, Matthew Wright, Jarryd Cachia etc. who are ready to go than the 120th-180th best juniors in the country. As the SANFL houses a lot of these types, I think we'll see teams punt on your Luke Crane, Jeremy Clayton, Allen, Ezard etc. more often as ready made cover for injuries.
Im not sure how you can deny that under an official AFL reserves comp, that the SANFL will be raped of its talent. Are you that naive? Then again, 4-5 weeks ago you were scoffing at anyone that was suggesting that any of the SANFL directors would vote the Crows in.