Afterthesiren wrote:cracka wrote:Have to agree with has been regarding the state of Mt Barker oval. Our U13 Gold side had to play there last night after their A grade & it was a disgrace, close to being as bad as Bridgewater oval. I know we had a lot of rain overnight but that's not a good enough excuse for the oval being as bad as it was. Lighting is a joke as well.
Why don't some of these clubs refuse to play on the ground. Both clubs have to sign off on the surface as fit, safe and healthy to play on the morning of game day. Here's a thought, instead of putting over 100 children and men in an unsafe environment by playing on that surface simply don't sign off on the ground as fit to play on. Apparently spending tens of thousands of dollars on an electronic scoreboard is more important than player safety to Mt Barker. Oh... and tens of thousands of dollars going into the pockets of many A grade players. I challenge the remaining clubs who have to play on this dung hole to make a stand at the start of the day and refuse the ground as a fit surface to play on. The HFL has an obligation to follow up on this also... but will they??
i see that barker have two more home games this year. is the oval good enough to see the year out, or will they have to move them? agree that it might need the hfl to step in in make the hard decision as barker have a vested (financial) interest in not moving.