
Keith Thomas wrote:Here we go again!
Why does SA footy always try to make things seem harder than they actually are?
by Wedgie » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:38 pm
Keith Thomas wrote:Here we go again!
Why does SA footy always try to make things seem harder than they actually are?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:40 pm
on the rails wrote:I like to keep abreast of what the "simple people" are doing at Alberton so it is nice to read it in the free press!
by Ian » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:44 pm
Booney wrote:
I could use one of Beenreals comments here.
by Booney » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:44 pm
Ian wrote:Booney wrote:
I could use one of Beenreals comments here.
I thought you were much smarter than that Booney
by on the rails » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:48 pm
Booney wrote: So you don't agree with the content yet choose to keep reading it? I could use one of Beenreals comments here.
by Booney » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:53 pm
on the rails wrote:Booney wrote: So you don't agree with the content yet choose to keep reading it? I could use one of Beenreals comments here.
I like to balance my factual well reserached and structured reading with fiction and amusing rubbish and the PAFC are providing plenty of that re this debate! Mind you to be fair and balanced, Rob Chapman's claims re crowd numbers for the "Ravens" are equally amusingly rubbish and laughable!
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:02 pm
by Macca19 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:18 pm
Jim05 wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Was one of my all time favourites but wouldnt give him the time of day if I saw him now.
I hope he isnt welcome at Norwood anymore
Sook. Like he is the only person driving this. He's better off without people like you speaking to him anyway.
Oh really?
Sorry for not liking a guy who is trying to destroy the comp and club that served him so well for all those years.
by Macca19 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:19 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney, what happened to the integrity of the successful "One Club" proposal that said "Port Magpies will never be used as a Power Reserves team"?
by amber_fluid » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:23 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:24 pm
amber_fluid wrote:As a Port Magpies supporter for all my 38 years of life and certainly NOT a Port Power supporter(why does everyone assume you have to be both).......and attending more Port Magpie premiership wins in that period than some people have attended minor round games........I certainly don't want the Power reserves playing in the SANFL parading as the Magpies.
Even though the real Port(SANFL Magpies) died a slow death in late 96'..............I have still tried to follow them since then.
For Port supporters like myself there is no solution to their current plight?
Unfortunately the life support the Magpies have been on since 97' is shortly going to be turned off forever!!!
F**k the Power!!
RIP the real Port.
by areaman » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:27 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:35 pm
Macca19 wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney, what happened to the integrity of the successful "One Club" proposal that said "Port Magpies will never be used as a Power Reserves team"?
I dont recall it ever saying this. Happy to be proven wrong though.
by on the rails » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:37 pm
by Booney » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:40 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Macca19 wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney, what happened to the integrity of the successful "One Club" proposal that said "Port Magpies will never be used as a Power Reserves team"?
I dont recall it ever saying this. Happy to be proven wrong though.
Both articles from 2010.
http://www.portmagpies.com.au/newsarchi ... ews_id=636
"Will the Magpies be a Reserves team for the Power?
The Magpies will not operate as a Reserves side for the Power. Power players would continue to play for their aligned SANFL Club"
http://www.portmagpies.com.au/newsarchi ... ews_id=642
"The Magpies will continue to operate as a traditional SANFL club and not as a Reserves side for the Power, with Power-listed players still distributed throughout all SANFL clubs."
PAFC. Bullshitting the public since 1870.
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:40 pm
by Booney » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:41 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Well at least we know that he's happy now.
Always happy to inform a Port supporter with the truth as apart from PAFC propaganda, vitriol and hype.
by Macca19 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:41 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:41 pm
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Macca19 wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney, what happened to the integrity of the successful "One Club" proposal that said "Port Magpies will never be used as a Power Reserves team"?
I dont recall it ever saying this. Happy to be proven wrong though.
Both articles from 2010.
http://www.portmagpies.com.au/newsarchi ... ews_id=636
"Will the Magpies be a Reserves team for the Power?
The Magpies will not operate as a Reserves side for the Power. Power players would continue to play for their aligned SANFL Club"
http://www.portmagpies.com.au/newsarchi ... ews_id=642
"The Magpies will continue to operate as a traditional SANFL club and not as a Reserves side for the Power, with Power-listed players still distributed throughout all SANFL clubs."
PAFC. Bullshitting the public since 1870.
You're onto us. We hatched the plan in 1870 and waited until 2012 to spin some shit that we wanted to implement in 2013.
Too good mate, too good.
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:42 pm
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Well at least we know that he's happy now.
Always happy to inform a Port supporter with the truth as apart from PAFC propaganda, vitriol and hype.
![]()
You want the truth about Sturt?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |