by zedman » Fri May 24, 2013 11:19 am
by Alan » Fri May 24, 2013 12:19 pm
by Mr Beefy » Fri May 24, 2013 12:22 pm
Alan wrote:Player photos at Rosewater last night, and it was apparent that the face of Rosewater Hugh Johnson-Schroeder was feeling the pinch of living up to his pin up boy status, taking plenty of time to do his hair and having 8 photos taken before finally being satisfied with one
by moses » Fri May 24, 2013 12:39 pm
by Mr Beefy » Fri May 24, 2013 1:15 pm
moses wrote:It's The Master v His Apprentice up in the Coaches Box tomorrow in the Rosies v Lakes game
by Old Dog 13 » Sat May 25, 2013 4:59 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:Alan wrote:Player photos at Rosewater last night, and it was apparent that the face of Rosewater Hugh Johnson-Schroeder was feeling the pinch of living up to his pin up boy status, taking plenty of time to do his hair and having 8 photos taken before finally being satisfied with one
At least he had his photo taken, Rumbelow wouldn't have his done cos he didn't have time to run a rinse through his grey hair.
by Brodlach » Sat May 25, 2013 5:31 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by gutterboy » Sat May 25, 2013 6:02 pm
by sprinttospace » Sat May 25, 2013 7:38 pm
by Esteban Vihaio » Sat May 25, 2013 7:53 pm
by Brodlach » Sat May 25, 2013 7:57 pm
sprinttospace wrote:A least they were consistent even when they were wrong. Making decisions to far from the play but certainly seemed close enough to hand out plenty of 25's for backchat.
Can't say I've ever seen a yellow card given to a player from the winning team after the final siren.
Our defence played exceptionally well. Forwards needed to make more of their chances, 5 goal 15 makes it hard to win.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Yank Man » Sat May 25, 2013 8:42 pm
gutterboy wrote:watched lockleys and mitchell park lockleys were to good.The best player for mitchell park #8 was sitting on the flank.I don't know what mitchell park coaches are thinking when you have your best player sitting there doing nothing.Get the guy in the middle where the ball is won and you might start being mote competive tha you are
by gutterboy » Sat May 25, 2013 9:00 pm
Yank Man wrote:gutterboy wrote:watched lockleys and mitchell park lockleys were to good.The best player for mitchell park #8 was sitting on the flank.I don't know what mitchell park coaches are thinking when you have your best player sitting there doing nothing.Get the guy in the middle where the ball is won and you might start being mote competive tha you are
One player doesn't win a game. I hear what you are saying gutterboy but when he slots in the middle he cops a run with who is happy to concede a handful of possessions and #8 becomes a negative. Guess the coaches are just trying to work out his best scenario, don't be too critical. Fact is if he was in a top 3 team he would be the best wingman in Div 6 by a mile, all due respect to the quality of the comp.
by Yank Man » Sat May 25, 2013 9:08 pm
gutterboy wrote:Yank Man wrote:gutterboy wrote:watched lockleys and mitchell park lockleys were to good.The best player for mitchell park #8 was sitting on the flank.I don't know what mitchell park coaches are thinking when you have your best player sitting there doing nothing.Get the guy in the middle where the ball is won and you might start being mote competive tha you are
One player doesn't win a game. I hear what you are saying gutterboy but when he slots in the middle he cops a run with who is happy to concede a handful of possessions and #8 becomes a negative. Guess the coaches are just trying to work out his best scenario, don't be too critical. Fact is if he was in a top 3 team he would be the best wingman in Div 6 by a mile, all due respect to the quality of the comp.
I agree 1 player doesn't win a game...but playing him on the flank when mitchell park could use his run and drive.Doesnt make any sense to me.Should be in the middle or on the wing using his leg speed and getting heap of the ball...but playing up forward is a waste....
by morell » Sat May 25, 2013 10:34 pm
by mighty hounds » Sun May 26, 2013 10:33 am
sprinttospace wrote:A least they were consistent even when they were wrong. Making decisions to far from the play but certainly seemed close enough to hand out plenty of 25's for backchat.
Can't say I've ever seen a yellow card given to a player from the winning team after the final siren.
Our defence played exceptionally well. Forwards needed to make more of their chances, 5 goal 15 makes it hard to win.
by zedman » Sun May 26, 2013 11:55 am
mighty hounds wrote:sprinttospace wrote:A least they were consistent even when they were wrong. Making decisions to far from the play but certainly seemed close enough to hand out plenty of 25's for backchat.
Can't say I've ever seen a yellow card given to a player from the winning team after the final siren.
Our defence played exceptionally well. Forwards needed to make more of their chances, 5 goal 15 makes it hard to win.
Did it rain where you guys played sprint? Low scoring if it was dry. I saw Brincat was best. Did he get the job on Harvey? Noticed he didn't any goals?
by mighty hounds » Sun May 26, 2013 12:44 pm
zedman wrote:mighty hounds wrote:sprinttospace wrote:A least they were consistent even when they were wrong. Making decisions to far from the play but certainly seemed close enough to hand out plenty of 25's for backchat.
Can't say I've ever seen a yellow card given to a player from the winning team after the final siren.
Our defence played exceptionally well. Forwards needed to make more of their chances, 5 goal 15 makes it hard to win.
Did it rain where you guys played sprint? Low scoring if it was dry. I saw Brincat was best. Did he get the job on Harvey? Noticed he didn't any goals?
didnt rain..an ugly game from start to finish as a spectacle..3 goals each at half time on a beautiful day..lions really struggled to come up again after last weeks shoot out and the hounds came to play with a well organised "shut down" game plan and were unlucky not to win..brincat played as the 7th defender so most of the day he had nobody on him after the centre bounce..harmer stood harvey and he got 2 goals not zero..we were glad to come away with the points for sure..
by sprinttospace » Sun May 26, 2013 5:33 pm
zedman wrote:mighty hounds wrote:sprinttospace wrote:A least they were consistent even when they were wrong. Making decisions to far from the play but certainly seemed close enough to hand out plenty of 25's for backchat.
Can't say I've ever seen a yellow card given to a player from the winning team after the final siren.
Our defence played exceptionally well. Forwards needed to make more of their chances, 5 goal 15 makes it hard to win.
Did it rain where you guys played sprint? Low scoring if it was dry. I saw Brincat was best. Did he get the job on Harvey? Noticed he didn't any goals?
didnt rain..an ugly game from start to finish as a spectacle..3 goals each at half time on a beautiful day..lions really struggled to come up again after last weeks shoot out and the hounds came to play with a well organised "shut down" game plan and were unlucky not to win..harmer stood harvey and he got 2 goals not zero..we were glad to come away with the points for sure..
by zedman » Sun May 26, 2013 6:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |