by dangermouse » Mon May 21, 2007 5:42 pm
by Sherrin » Mon May 21, 2007 5:52 pm
by shake'n'bake » Mon May 21, 2007 7:17 pm
by LVIS » Mon May 21, 2007 7:20 pm
Sherrin wrote:If anyone should be made accountable at HFL quarters would it not be the League Secretary, who is paid for the job as opposed to Uncle Owie, who volunteers?
His car is there more often than not!
When its not in Milang...
by The Crumber » Mon May 21, 2007 8:22 pm
Tex wrote:Good call on Echunga - perhaps a little hasty there. Can anyone tell me WTF has happened at Cally??? They WERE competitive against us but seem to have really fallen away last 2 weeks - players left, injuries....?
by The Crumber » Mon May 21, 2007 8:44 pm
LVIS wrote:Sherrin wrote:If anyone should be made accountable at HFL quarters would it not be the League Secretary, who is paid for the job as opposed to Uncle Owie, who volunteers?
His car is there more often than not!
When its not in Milang...
Accountable for what Owen, oops Sherrin? Accountable for the fact that the league president grants permits without going through the proper process. Not sure what your on about.
by LVIS » Mon May 21, 2007 9:41 pm
The Crumber wrote:LVIS wrote:Sherrin wrote:If anyone should be made accountable at HFL quarters would it not be the League Secretary, who is paid for the job as opposed to Uncle Owie, who volunteers?
His car is there more often than not!
When its not in Milang...
Accountable for what Owen, oops Sherrin? Accountable for the fact that the league president grants permits without going through the proper process. Not sure what your on about.
Cheers LVIS. Well all I can say in this is that I didn't get a Budget, but I wish I knew what was on page 3. No-one will tell me. Was it a pin-up of the little white dog in a G-string? Everyone I asked had bought a Budget but only bothered with the Team lists on the day and binned the rest. And some had read their own Club Corner. Couldn't even crumb for one today as all the bins at my local ground were locked. I quess the accountability buck in any organisation stops with the President or Chairperson. Never mind who gets paid what.
by oldblueeyes » Mon May 21, 2007 9:44 pm
by Banker » Mon May 21, 2007 10:21 pm
by the wonder elephant » Tue May 22, 2007 12:27 am
by Cougar » Tue May 22, 2007 9:13 am
joe scuderi wrote:well for starters boss man they were not flogged they were competitive all day and if you read what i have written i said we were top 4 full strength we are still without 5 a grade players and i think you will find have gotten closer then anyone else to kersbrook and cougar if you were at the game you would have to agree we were competitive and as for the money thing obviously i dont play there so i can not say for 100% that they are on big bucks and i dont know your position either to know if you would know or not but dont be naive and always believe what you are told because there is such thing as " under the table "
oh yeah boss man how is the club you are from going ???????????????????
by Thunder Down Under » Tue May 22, 2007 9:32 am
by Rapper » Tue May 22, 2007 10:01 am
by ball magnet » Tue May 22, 2007 10:20 am
by The Crumber » Tue May 22, 2007 11:13 am
by Mop Up » Tue May 22, 2007 12:41 pm
by Justquietly » Tue May 22, 2007 12:54 pm
by Rooster » Tue May 22, 2007 1:05 pm
dangermouse wrote:
And Lobey what happened there? Did Birdwood play out of their skin or were the tigers really bad? I've heard that Lobey are as strong if not stronger in personell than last season yet performances have been way under expectations. What's goin on there? If Rooster is still out there how do you rate your team's performance on satdy and also Lobey as a unit?
by Cougar » Tue May 22, 2007 1:51 pm
Rooster wrote:dangermouse wrote:
And Lobey what happened there? Did Birdwood play out of their skin or were the tigers really bad? I've heard that Lobey are as strong if not stronger in personell than last season yet performances have been way under expectations. What's goin on there? If Rooster is still out there how do you rate your team's performance on satdy and also Lobey as a unit?
All i can say is i know there's a lot of 'should of's' in footy, but Birdwood really 'should of' beaten Lobey on the weekend, we completely dominated the first half, had all the run and the play, but didn't totally capitalize, missed too many easy goals. Then the rain came, and Lobey's slow big bodies came to the front, and pushed ahead. We had also 4 key Agraders out, 2 or which are key forwards and would've made a lot of difference. Very dissapointing, once again 'should of' been Birdwood's first central victory. look out bridgewater.
As for Lobey, old, slow, average. Obviously a few smart old hats running aound still though.
Football
Other Footy Leagues
Country Footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

