CENTURION wrote:dedja wrote:Have the Eagles won a Noble Prize yet for their much vaunted salary cap system ...
it's NOBEL, you uneducated biff.

by am Bays » Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:17 pm
CENTURION wrote:dedja wrote:Have the Eagles won a Noble Prize yet for their much vaunted salary cap system ...
it's NOBEL, you uneducated biff.
by Pseudo » Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:32 pm
CENTURION wrote:dedja wrote:Have the Eagles won a Noble Prize yet for their much vaunted salary cap system ...
it's NOBEL, you uneducated biff.
by dedja » Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:35 pm
by SANFLnut » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:47 pm
JK wrote:holden78 wrote:I have been advised that Norwood do not use a salary cap structure ala the Eagles..... so if you were to add all their contracts up.... no way they can be under the cap playing their best 21 each week!
Having heavy performance based contracts with a top notch/ talented squad seems to rely on having some injuries to balance out the books at the end of the season.
What seems to give CEO's nightmares is the unknown number of AFL games that count let's say $500 per player each game, making it somewhat of a guessing game until the minor round is over.
Going over by a minor amount is hardly cheating ala the "Camry Cheats", but over as much as Westies were can't be accepted at all.
Time will tell if anything interesting comes out in the new year, but we did warn about the new Sheriff
Norwood were well under TPP for 2012 .. I'm aware of the whispers going around as most would be, and we'll wait and see what it may or may not amount to, but it's not for exceeding the Cap.
by on the rails » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:01 pm
SANFLnut wrote: All clubs would be under if they were as selective as Norwood with what they included in their TPP. Norwood are in the gun for making other payments and not including them as salary cap in the version of events that I heard. No excuses for the number of salary cap breaches we are still seeing.
by Jim05 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:15 pm
by daysofourlives » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:25 pm
Jim05 wrote:Yet another reason we should faark the Crows and Power listed players off to the VFL.
The current Salary cap is a shambles and no wonder clubs are in trouble when you have to be an expert in nuclear physics to work out the TPP
by Jim05 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:35 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Yet another reason we should faark the Crows and Power listed players off to the VFL.
The current Salary cap is a shambles and no wonder clubs are in trouble when you have to be an expert in nuclear physics to work out the TPP
Here come the excuses from the biggest cheats of them all. At least Port and West were "accidental"
by Grahaml » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:18 pm
Jim05 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Yet another reason we should faark the Crows and Power listed players off to the VFL.
The current Salary cap is a shambles and no wonder clubs are in trouble when you have to be an expert in nuclear physics to work out the TPP
Here come the excuses from the biggest cheats of them all. At least Port and West were "accidental"
Coming from a Centrals supporter![]()
No excuses, if we are guilty we should cop it.
Just seems like more and more clubs are breaching it or being investigated each year.
by on the rails » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:21 pm
Grahaml wrote: And getting pathetic penalties that make cheating worthwhile. This is why an import rule seems to be getting more and more necessary.
by am Bays » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:22 pm
Jim05 wrote:Coming from a Centrals supporter![]()
No excuses, if we are guilty we should cop it.
Just seems like more and more clubs are breaching it or being investigated each year.
by Jim05 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:27 pm
on the rails wrote:Grahaml wrote: And getting pathetic penalties that make cheating worthwhile. This is why an import rule seems to be getting more and more necessary.
We have an import rule now. I thought when it came in that it was restictive but you can see over the past few seasons with no scrutiny on $$$ re Vic Clubs outside the AFL how hard it is to recruit even VFL State League players let alone ex AFL listed players.
by on the rails » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:31 pm
by The Apostle » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:16 pm
Jim05 wrote:Yet another reason we should faark the Crows and Power listed players off to the VFL.
The current Salary cap is a shambles and no wonder clubs are in trouble when you have to be an expert in nuclear physics to work out the TPP
by CENTURION » Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:16 pm
Jim05 wrote:Yet another reason we should faark the Crows and Power listed players off to the VFL.
The current Salary cap is a shambles and no wonder clubs are in trouble when you have to be an expert in nuclear physics to work out the TPP
by purch » Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:34 pm
by The Apostle » Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:55 pm
purch wrote:When was that dynasty again?
by purch » Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:13 pm
The Apostle wrote:purch wrote:When was that dynasty again?
Isn't your side currently going through one???
by Long live SAnFL » Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:12 am
The Apostle wrote:Jim05 wrote:Yet another reason we should faark the Crows and Power listed players off to the VFL.
The current Salary cap is a shambles and no wonder clubs are in trouble when you have to be an expert in nuclear physics to work out the TPP
Agreed. Get rid of it!!!
by JK » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:09 am
SANFLnut wrote:All clubs would be under if they were as selective as Norwood with what they included in their TPP.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |