by Johno6 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:42 am
by HH3 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:40 am
by Johno6 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:52 am
by JK » Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:13 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:28 am
Frosty wrote:How would all of this saga be affecting the players, coaches, hierarchy and even supporters of the Swans?
Do they really want to inherit this bloke and all his baggage, his selfishness, his salary, his threatening to sue his former club, etc.
Surely they would be starting to second guess whether this is going to be a negative impact on a club who just won a premiership without this bloke.
And to top it all off Tippett refuses to meet with GWS management who in turn have de-listed Brogan to make room for Tippett.
What a mess!!!
by Frosty » Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:37 am
by Perfect Drug » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:05 pm
Frosty wrote:Yeah but Morton probably gets $200K a year tops and the weight of expectation on him would be far less than that on KT at the moment. Expensive lesson having a million dollar man running around in the 2's until round 20.
Not to mention Morton probably left his last place of employment on slightly better terms than Tippett, i.e. not threatening to sue them. Surely there is an enormous cloud hanging over his head and anyone taking him on risks the same being done to them when he doesn't get his way.
by Hondo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:13 pm
by OnSong » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:13 pm
by whufc » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:34 pm
OnSong wrote:This whole saga is vomit-worthy. Lucky I wasn't a Lance Armstrong fan as well.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:45 pm
OnSong wrote:This whole saga is vomit-worthy. Lucky I wasn't a Lance Armstrong fan as well.
by UK Fan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:46 pm
Hondo wrote:Is Tippett necessarially any more "selfish" or money hungry or whatever criticism we could throw at him than any other player? Don't they all ideally want to play for who and where they want and earn their market value? Once the must-leave-Adelaide issue is resolved there may not be as much baggage there to deal with as some think.
Not sure about the line of argument that he is now a flawed character that Sydney must avoid. I assume they would still want him as much as they did a month ago.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Frosty » Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:41 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:03 pm
Frosty wrote:I'm sure there are plenty of mercenaries in the AFL but there are also numerous stories of players taking pay cuts to stay at a club for the good of all concerned. I.e. Geelong - and look where that's got them over the last 5 years.
At what point did Sydney actually come out and say they wanted Tippett? Before or after he elected to go there much to the surprise of the football world.
Obviously the other players mentioned went chasing $$$ but legitimately testing free agency as opposed to getting paid extra in jam and cream filled chocolate donuts...
by bd u15 09 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:56 pm
by UK Fan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:14 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by RustyCage » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:37 pm
by heater31 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:41 pm
UK Fan wrote:http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/adelaide-salary-probe-widens-20121115-29euo.html
So Van berlo signed a contract knowing it was not legitimate.
As the captain of Adelaide football club He should be made an example of for younger players and be de-registered from afl immediately.![]()
by am Bays » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:49 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:I think Sydney went after Tippett in the week before the grand final.![]()
Seriously I think they may have been caught by surprise, like everyone was.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |