
by Interceptor » Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:32 pm
by smac » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:00 pm
Johno6 wrote:I love the headin on afl.com.au "Hardwick slams the MRP"
in regards to the sellwood case, all he said was "they are takin the piss arent they" while laughing as a joke
i wouldnt exactly call that slamming the MRP.
by stan » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:04 pm
by RustyCage » Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:03 pm
by bd u15 09 » Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:17 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Hartlett had his suspension upped to two weeks
by daysofourlives » Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:35 pm
bd u15 09 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Hartlett had his suspension upped to two weeks
Absolute load of carp. Wasn't even conclusive vision. Can't believe he got done for that!
by Turbo » Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:29 pm
daysofourlives wrote:bd u15 09 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Hartlett had his suspension upped to two weeks
Absolute load of carp. Wasn't even conclusive vision. Can't believe he got done for that!
Maybe now he will stop being a try hard tough man, he is a joke and deserves his 2 for a pathetic attack off the ball
by Courtney Fish » Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:08 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:25 am
Courtney Fish wrote:Have you guys seen the vision, Rioli is soft he initiated the whole thing stopping Hartlett from leading, then drops like he had been shot when Hartlett was 4 metres away.
by MatteeG » Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:48 am
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by JK » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:01 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:Courtney Fish wrote:Have you guys seen the vision, Rioli is soft he initiated the whole thing stopping Hartlett from leading, then drops like he had been shot when Hartlett was 4 metres away.
Agree with this totally. Both players were having a go at each other, Hartlett runs back to the contest as does Rioli for a few steps then goes to his knees. Vision proves nothing.
by Dols » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:11 am
JK wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Courtney Fish wrote:Have you guys seen the vision, Rioli is soft he initiated the whole thing stopping Hartlett from leading, then drops like he had been shot when Hartlett was 4 metres away.
Agree with this totally. Both players were having a go at each other, Hartlett runs back to the contest as does Rioli for a few steps then goes to his knees. Vision proves nothing.
Saw the vision for the first time last night and am staggered that Hartlett got done on that basis .. There was no clear vision of blows landed and it appeared as though both players were getting into each other
by JK » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:27 am
Dols wrote:JK wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Courtney Fish wrote:Have you guys seen the vision, Rioli is soft he initiated the whole thing stopping Hartlett from leading, then drops like he had been shot when Hartlett was 4 metres away.
Agree with this totally. Both players were having a go at each other, Hartlett runs back to the contest as does Rioli for a few steps then goes to his knees. Vision proves nothing.
Saw the vision for the first time last night and am staggered that Hartlett got done on that basis .. There was no clear vision of blows landed and it appeared as though both players were getting into each other
problem is he was charged after an investigation not solely on the vision. Rioli is obviously a dog and blabbed like a baby.
by stan » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:54 am
Dols wrote:JK wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Courtney Fish wrote:Have you guys seen the vision, Rioli is soft he initiated the whole thing stopping Hartlett from leading, then drops like he had been shot when Hartlett was 4 metres away.
Agree with this totally. Both players were having a go at each other, Hartlett runs back to the contest as does Rioli for a few steps then goes to his knees. Vision proves nothing.
Saw the vision for the first time last night and am staggered that Hartlett got done on that basis .. There was no clear vision of blows landed and it appeared as though both players were getting into each other
problem is he was charged after an investigation not solely on the vision. Rioli is obviously a dog and blabbed like a baby.
by Mr Beefy » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:11 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:35 pm
MatteeG wrote:LOL- the 'Hammer' hitting someone in the nads. What an enforcer he is...
FWIW- no way that footage should convict anyone!
by scoob » Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:42 pm
by MatteeG » Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:59 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:MatteeG wrote:LOL- the 'Hammer' hitting someone in the nads. What an enforcer he is...
FWIW- no way that footage should convict anyone!
Tell that to Joel Selwood who got four weeks on digital guesswork last year. There is only one thing you can expect from the MRP, inconsistency.
regards,
REB
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Mr66 » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:40 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |