by JK » Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:37 pm
by dedja » Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:39 pm
by RustyCage » Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:05 am
Rik E Boy wrote:When did Port last get the spoon? 1900?
regards,
REB
by am Bays » Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:55 am
Blacky wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Blacky wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:For the love of the spaghetti monster, no more West games on tv.
why not
2 weeks in a row of the worst standard of football I have witnessed.
dont watch it on telly go support you team like i do
by CENTURION » Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:12 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:24 am
by dedja » Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:44 am
by NO-MERCY » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:28 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:30 pm
by leonidis » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:45 pm
by beenreal » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:34 pm
by Booney » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:38 pm
by FlyingHigh » Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:33 pm
Macca19 wrote:Just a terrible, terrible game of football. West were awful. Port were a disaster. Its correct that the scoreline flattered us. Despite the margin being within a kick or two for pretty much the entire game, I never felt at any stage we could get over the line and win the match. None at all. Might as well have been a 10 goal margin the whole day as there was next to no chance of Port finding a teammate more than twice in a row before turning it over.
The defence worked reasonably well. Beard and Raisiwaka were good, Slattery was alright. the midfield was well beaten. The forward line was non existant, but I wont be too harsh on the forwards. You're gonna struggle to win when you have the ball constantly kicked to the advantage of your opponent. So many genuine leads with kicks that forced the player to prop, stop and attempt to mark in a pack that should have been a lace out kick in front.
.
JK wrote:You have to wonder (and the same goes for Norwood), whether Westies style which predominantly built from defence keeps them in a high percentage of games, also keeps their opposition in the game on the scoreboard.
They have a lot of talent in their list that you would think could blow the opposition away at times.
beenreal wrote:I had Bamford's 3/4 time instructions relayed to me word for word on the way off the ground. To quote," West will flood, so kick long and direct, use the corridor and be smart about it".
Kicking with a howling breeze, that last Quarter was some of the dumbest football I've seen in years (EVER?) from the PAFC. With every West Adelaide player in our forward 50 you'd have to be kidding yourself if you believe their instruction was to play short, hence straight into Andy Collins hands.
I also heard that many players don't like Bamford because he is too hard on them. Well toughen up Princess because I'll never buy into player power!
by UK Fan » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:12 pm
Booney wrote:Probably more of a case of Bamford having been hard on many of these blokes for 5 or more years through the grades.
They might just be sick of the same message etc.
Either way, time for a change.
The question is, who?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Big Phil » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:23 pm
UK Fan wrote:Who are the other (Port Magpies) assistants apart from Bienke ??
by Strawb » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:25 pm
by UK Fan » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:17 pm
Strawb wrote:waiting for it on iview
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:56 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:52 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |