by beenreal » Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:03 pm
Booney wrote:SDK wrote:The Port Power are, have always been and always will be unviable.
Stop wasting money on a dead duck and let them die. Neither Adelaide Oval nor Jesus Christ himself can save Port Power so stop kidding ourself and pull the plug now. How long do they fxxxing want ?
Just makes me sad that the Port Adelaide Magpies ... the real Port Adelaide, have hitched themself to a fallen star.
Week in and week out people walk away from a shit brand of football that Port Power play.
At least the Crows woke up, got rid of the robot master Craig and appointed a coach who will provide an entertaining style of play and bring back the crowds.
How far from reality do you want to be? You have simply associated on-field success with financial viability which is not a reality.
by oldfella » Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:35 pm
by UK Fan » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:10 pm
whufc wrote:More evidence UK Fan was right after all!!!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by UK Fan » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:12 pm
The Riddler wrote:More proof UK Fan was correct!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:24 pm
Macca19 wrote:yawn.
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:53 pm
Booney wrote:SDK wrote:The Port Power are, have always been and always will be unviable.
Stop wasting money on a dead duck and let them die. Neither Adelaide Oval nor Jesus Christ himself can save Port Power so stop kidding ourself and pull the plug now. How long do they fxxxing want ?
Just makes me sad that the Port Adelaide Magpies ... the real Port Adelaide, have hitched themself to a fallen star.
Week in and week out people walk away from a shit brand of football that Port Power play.
At least the Crows woke up, got rid of the robot master Craig and appointed a coach who will provide an entertaining style of play and bring back the crowds.
How far from reality do you want to be? You have simply associated on-field success with financial viability which is not a reality.
by RustyCage » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:00 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Booney wrote:SDK wrote:The Port Power are, have always been and always will be unviable.
Stop wasting money on a dead duck and let them die. Neither Adelaide Oval nor Jesus Christ himself can save Port Power so stop kidding ourself and pull the plug now. How long do they fxxxing want ?
Just makes me sad that the Port Adelaide Magpies ... the real Port Adelaide, have hitched themself to a fallen star.
Week in and week out people walk away from a shit brand of football that Port Power play.
At least the Crows woke up, got rid of the robot master Craig and appointed a coach who will provide an entertaining style of play and bring back the crowds.
How far from reality do you want to be? You have simply associated on-field success with financial viability which is not a reality.
I beg to differ
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:40 pm
by Strawb » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:45 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:North Melbourne have never had a good supporter base - they should have folded years ago
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:49 pm
by Strawb » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:51 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Crows - Norwood, Sturt, SA & NA
Port - Port, WWT, WA & CD
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:54 pm
by Strawb » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:59 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:10 pm
by therisingblues » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:15 pm
Strawb wrote:I would look at it this way
Adelaide Crows: Nwd, Glen, St., S.A.
Cartel: WA, CD, WWT, N.A.
with Port to be stand alone.
by on the rails » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:16 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:OK - a compromise
Adelaide Crows - Norwood, Sturt, NA, WA, SA, CD & WWT
Adelaide Power - Port & Glenelg
Adelaide Power should go OK
by Strawb » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:26 pm
therisingblues wrote:Strawb wrote:I would look at it this way
Adelaide Crows: Nwd, Glen, St., S.A.
Cartel: WA, CD, WWT, N.A.
with Port to be stand alone.
A sort of South/East and North/West combination. It has merit in that you could draw a rough geographical line through Adelaide separating the two sides, and allowing a theoretical identity. I'd include Port in the North/West zone though. That'd possibly give them more support overall, but it'd be a near thing with the numbers of Sturt, Glenelg and Norwood supporters out there.
What colours would the N/W cartel wear and what would you call them? Assuming of course the S/E side would remain in the state colours and be called the Adelaide Crows.
by CENTURION » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:26 pm
on the rails wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:OK - a compromise
Adelaide Crows - Norwood, Sturt, NA, WA, SA, CD & WWT
Adelaide Power - Port & Glenelg
Adelaide Power should go OK
A better compromise:
Adelaide Crows - Centrals / Glenelg / North / Norwood / South Adelaide / Sturt / West Adelaide / WWT.
One Club / PAFC Power (or whatever they are called this year?) - the left overs from the old PAMFC carcass!
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:29 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |