CUTTERMAN wrote:All I'm reading is whining about whining
So you're whining about the whining of whining?
by Wedgie » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:04 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:All I'm reading is whining about whining
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Pseudo » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:16 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:All I'm reading is whining about whining
by mal » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:18 pm
am Bays wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:mal wrote:Yep NA wins the match, its all that counts
But the Historians of the NW + NA football clubs need to know the facts NOW
In the year 2525, the historians will only see a 1 point win for NA
Some bright spark will have recorded the safooty annuals and time capsuled this thread perhaps
Then the humans of 2525 will know there was some controversy in this match
As there was in the following games influenced by late umpiring decisions
1978 NW V ST Grand Final
1945 WT V NA First Semi Final
Give it a rest
Sh!t no, don't spoil the laughs for the rest of us!!
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:33 pm
Wedgie wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:All I'm reading is whining about whining
So you're whining about the whining of whining?
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:36 pm
on the rails wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:All I'm reading is whining about whining
That's rich coming from a Sturt supporter???
by CENTURION » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:37 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:on the rails wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:All I'm reading is whining about whining
That's rich coming from a Sturt supporter???
Is that a question or a statement.
by rod_rooster » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:16 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:22 pm
by Killa » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:26 pm
by on the rails » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:42 pm
Killa wrote:As a neutral viewer live the last two non decissions by the umpires was ordinary. Holding the ball which wasn't paid then norwood players could not shut their mouths giving away free kick goal and the last one before the siren should have been a free kick for tripping. Those two decissions they were given all day but they put the whistle away. And norwood supporters were not impressed with blackwell with his tagging techniques. After the game norwood supporters look like they were going to riot.
by dedja » Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:17 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:Come on €enturion you're a smart bloke ...
by diceman » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:33 am
dedja wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Come on €enturion you're a smart bloke ...
(in a John McEnroe accent) you cannot be serious
by topsywaldron » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:58 am
on the rails wrote:Killa wrote:As a neutral viewer live the last two non decissions by the umpires was ordinary. Holding the ball which wasn't paid then norwood players could not shut their mouths giving away free kick goal and the last one before the siren should have been a free kick for tripping. Those two decissions they were given all day but they put the whistle away. And norwood supporters were not impressed with blackwell with his tagging techniques. After the game norwood supporters look like they were going to riot.
Oh dear some of those fair minded and sporting Nwd supporters don't like North taggers - Gallman in the past and now Backwell. Must be tough following Norwood?
by Wedgie » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:10 am
Killa wrote:After the game norwood supporters look like they were going to riot.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by dedja » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:12 am
by Mic » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:12 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:16 am
mal wrote:am Bays wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:mal wrote:Yep NA wins the match, its all that counts
But the Historians of the NW + NA football clubs need to know the facts NOW
In the year 2525, the historians will only see a 1 point win for NA
Some bright spark will have recorded the safooty annuals and time capsuled this thread perhaps
Then the humans of 2525 will know there was some controversy in this match
As there was in the following games influenced by late umpiring decisions
1978 NW V ST Grand Final
1945 WT V NA First Semi Final
Give it a rest
Sh!t no, don't spoil the laughs for the rest of us!!
Am Bays
The Sleeping Giant
My apologies for this unrealistic, outrageous, stoopid post
But its the only way I can compete with youse
by on the rails » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:22 am
topsywaldron wrote:on the rails wrote: Oh dear some of those fair minded and sporting Nwd supporters don't like North taggers - Gallman in the past and now Backwell. Must be tough following Norwood?
Stop inventing controversy, check out who Killa supports.
by whufc » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:28 am
on the rails wrote:topsywaldron wrote:on the rails wrote: Oh dear some of those fair minded and sporting Nwd supporters don't like North taggers - Gallman in the past and now Backwell. Must be tough following Norwood?
Stop inventing controversy, check out who Killa supports.
I saw who he barracked for??? I just made a "tongue in cheek" comment to his post because apparently as a keen neutral observer he noticed that some of you Nwd people don't take too kindly to not having things your way. I see one of your players got reported for abusing the umpire after the game. First Bode coughs up a free that leads to North's last goal, Suckling gets reported for abuse and Bassett sooks like a girl in the press and apparently the Nwd fans were going to riot.
Geez you lost your first game for the season in Round 11 by a point - hardly the stuff for the hysteria you lot are carrying on with led of course by your arrogant sooky lal coach!
I shouldn't be surprised with Nwd supporters though when you promote things like MONSFAW and have secret clandestine meetings behind the toilet blocks to keep it a secret!
by on the rails » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:46 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |