by Big Phil » Mon May 14, 2012 9:07 pm
by Jim05 » Mon May 14, 2012 9:16 pm
by robranisgod » Mon May 14, 2012 9:58 pm
Jim05 wrote:If there is no Jimmy the Dogs by 70+
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon May 14, 2012 10:08 pm
by Jim05 » Mon May 14, 2012 10:18 pm
robranisgod wrote:Jim05 wrote:If there is no Jimmy the Dogs by 70+
Incredibly North beat Central at Prospect last year without Jimmy, but I would be very surprised if it happened again.
by Big Phil » Mon May 14, 2012 10:28 pm
Jim05 wrote:robranisgod wrote:Jim05 wrote:If there is no Jimmy the Dogs by 70+
Incredibly North beat Central at Prospect last year without Jimmy, but I would be very surprised if it happened again.
Yes but you are already have enough players missing, dont think you can afford to lose another especially one of his quality
by whufc » Mon May 14, 2012 10:35 pm
robranisgod wrote:Jim05 wrote:If there is no Jimmy the Dogs by 70+
Incredibly North beat Central at Prospect last year without Jimmy, but I would be very surprised if it happened again.
by on the rails » Tue May 15, 2012 7:59 am
by mickey » Tue May 15, 2012 11:05 am
by Big Phil » Tue May 15, 2012 1:48 pm
whufc wrote:Troy Menzel out will be a loss for the Dogs has been averaging 3 goals a game, hopefully Jenner comes into the side for him.
by on the rails » Wed May 16, 2012 7:54 am
by Agile » Wed May 16, 2012 8:07 am
on the rails wrote:Good news - Allan is free to play so that will reduce the loss hopefully to something respectable providing also we drop the others teams 7th forward - Nathan Blee!
by on the rails » Wed May 16, 2012 8:23 am
Agile wrote:on the rails wrote:Good news - Allan is free to play so that will reduce the loss hopefully to something respectable providing also we drop the others teams 7th forward - Nathan Blee!
Will be very interesting to see the team selections this week. If "spud" is in then centrals by heaps. If "spud" dropped then centrals by lots.
No Allers, no Gill as main contributers last year and no one standing up to replace them. Miles HAS TO STAY BACK not move around as a stop gap measure.
by robranisgod » Wed May 16, 2012 9:13 am
Agile wrote:on the rails wrote:Good news - Allan is free to play so that will reduce the loss hopefully to something respectable providing also we drop the others teams 7th forward - Nathan Blee!
Will be very interesting to see the team selections this week. If "spud" is in then centrals by heaps. If "spud" dropped then centrals by lots.
No Allers, no Gill as main contributers last year and no one standing up to replace them. Miles HAS TO STAY BACK not move around as a stop gap measure.
by whufc » Wed May 16, 2012 9:32 am
robranisgod wrote:Agile wrote:on the rails wrote:Good news - Allan is free to play so that will reduce the loss hopefully to something respectable providing also we drop the others teams 7th forward - Nathan Blee!
Will be very interesting to see the team selections this week. If "spud" is in then centrals by heaps. If "spud" dropped then centrals by lots.
No Allers, no Gill as main contributers last year and no one standing up to replace them. Miles HAS TO STAY BACK not move around as a stop gap measure.
Allers didn't play in the win against Central last year, but as previously stated Nick Gill kicked 7 and Daniel Stewart 4. We would need Johnston and Boras to do something similar, which is highly unlikely.
by robranisgod » Wed May 16, 2012 9:56 am
whufc wrote:robranisgod wrote:Agile wrote:on the rails wrote:Good news - Allan is free to play so that will reduce the loss hopefully to something respectable providing also we drop the others teams 7th forward - Nathan Blee!
Will be very interesting to see the team selections this week. If "spud" is in then centrals by heaps. If "spud" dropped then centrals by lots.
No Allers, no Gill as main contributers last year and no one standing up to replace them. Miles HAS TO STAY BACK not move around as a stop gap measure.
Allers didn't play in the win against Central last year, but as previously stated Nick Gill kicked 7 and Daniel Stewart 4. We would need Johnston and Boras to do something similar, which is highly unlikely.
A big factor in that win as well was that you had Alleway in the forward line as well and the Dogs just didnt have 3 real big defenders, there was always at least one miss match in Norths forward line.
by robranisgod » Wed May 16, 2012 9:56 am
whufc wrote:robranisgod wrote:Agile wrote:on the rails wrote:Good news - Allan is free to play so that will reduce the loss hopefully to something respectable providing also we drop the others teams 7th forward - Nathan Blee!
Will be very interesting to see the team selections this week. If "spud" is in then centrals by heaps. If "spud" dropped then centrals by lots.
No Allers, no Gill as main contributers last year and no one standing up to replace them. Miles HAS TO STAY BACK not move around as a stop gap measure.
Allers didn't play in the win against Central last year, but as previously stated Nick Gill kicked 7 and Daniel Stewart 4. We would need Johnston and Boras to do something similar, which is highly unlikely.
A big factor in that win as well was that you had Alleway in the forward line as well and the Dogs just didnt have 3 real big defenders, there was always at least one miss match in Norths forward line.
by whufc » Wed May 16, 2012 10:17 am
by Pseudo » Wed May 16, 2012 11:05 am
on the rails wrote: As it was Blee was next to useless down back yet he also choose to have Hall start on the bench after keeping Duldig goalless the week before and move Miles from defence.
by on the rails » Wed May 16, 2012 12:54 pm
Pseudo wrote:on the rails wrote: As it was Blee was next to useless down back yet he also choose to have Hall start on the bench after keeping Duldig goalless the week before and move Miles from defence.
Whoa... did Duldig have a bad game against the Roosters?Been a long time coming.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |