by csbowes » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:02 pm
by csbowes » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:14 pm
dedja wrote:with all due respect, that's bullshit.
by whufc » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:24 pm
csbowes wrote:dedja wrote:with all due respect, that's bullshit.
No offence taken... but offer up a lazy mil and teams would come running.
by Grahaml » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:36 pm
whufc wrote:csbowes wrote:dedja wrote:with all due respect, that's bullshit.
No offence taken... but offer up a lazy mil and teams would come running.
Definatly if the big money was there teams would seriously consider it.
Comps like the champions league in europe are run by their founding/governing bodies so there will be an element of prestige to them.
Comps like world series cricket created by rich businessmen/companies/t.v stations need to award huge amount of prize money to get teams/players interested
by whufc » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:39 pm
Grahaml wrote:whufc wrote:csbowes wrote:dedja wrote:with all due respect, that's bullshit.
No offence taken... but offer up a lazy mil and teams would come running.
Definatly if the big money was there teams would seriously consider it.
Comps like the champions league in europe are run by their founding/governing bodies so there will be an element of prestige to them.
Comps like world series cricket created by rich businessmen/companies/t.v stations need to award huge amount of prize money to get teams/players interested
Champions league soccer is totally different to the foxtel cup. The winner of the champions league gets to claim to be the greatest club in europe and therefore possibly the world. Foxtel cup winners get to say they're the 19th greatest club in the country. Also, it's easier to juggle the two competitions in soccer. Partly because it's not the same contact sport so injuries and soreness are less but also there are a great many games where Man United would win easily with their second best side. The SANFL isn't a competition where you could leave out half your best side and still win easily enough most of the time.
In the end, whatever prizemoney is on offer, the clubs have to spend it somewhere. They can't (within the rules) spend it on players and there are only so many buildings you can put up before you're simply wasting money. You wouldn't dare rip out the pokies to rely on winning a foxtel cup for income and without shareholders or an owner to give the money to it'll just sit in a bank account making for a nice looking annual statement.
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:10 pm
on the rails wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Did I miss something weren't these games supposed to be shown on foxtel.
Would have loved to have seen Claremont kick the crap out of Westies
It was on live yesterday on Fox Sports 1 at 1.30pm
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:19 pm
csbowes wrote:sjt wrote:Until Claremont is playing for an sanfl premiership, I couldn't give a rats not knowing if Centrals is a ten goal better or worse side than them
Obviously... but there are some of us who are interested.
In the end if the $$$ were right, Centrals and others would be in it. It's nothing to do with workload, commitment to the SANFL premiership and all that crap, $$$ would bring the teams in, they just can't be bothered for the money on offer.
by Dutchy » Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:29 pm
by mal » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:10 am
by holden78 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:02 am
by heater31 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:38 am
mal wrote:Im not slagging the comp
But I didnt even know the WA game was on until I saw the scores in the paper the next day
This comp is either poorly advertised or I'm not very observant
by Booney » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:09 am
holden78 wrote:West has just proven once again that the ROXTEL Cup is a joke and should be treated as such,
it's well known that Port was forced to play by the AFL as it's one club now and is relying on AFL money to get by, but why even sign up in the first place if your West?
by gossipgirl » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:46 am
Booney wrote:holden78 wrote:West has just proven once again that the ROXTEL Cup is a joke and should be treated as such,
it's well known that Port was forced to play by the AFL as it's one club now and is relying on AFL money to get by, but why even sign up in the first place if your West?
It's well known?
by Apachebulldog » Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:45 pm
by sjt » Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:56 pm
sjt wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Did I miss something weren't these games supposed to be shown on foxtel.
Would have loved to have seen Claremont kick the crap out of Westies
The news snippet, showed about four or five people did in the outer, not sure about grandstand side.
by maccad » Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:42 pm
by Grahaml » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:23 pm
by RB » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:51 pm
Grahaml wrote:Pick whether to get smashed or compromise premiership points.
by Booney » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:55 pm
RB wrote:Grahaml wrote:Pick whether to get smashed or compromise premiership points.
I don't think these are mutually exclusive. For example, Claremont were WAFL premiers and Foxtel Cup runners-up last year. It is a gross oversimplification to say that if you play a full-strength side, you'll not do well in the SANFL.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |