by hearts on fire » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:40 am
by Bum Crack » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:53 am
by Booney » Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:00 pm
by gossipgirl » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:47 pm
by Baron Greenback » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:56 pm
Booney wrote:Not a certainty, but they should finish in the top 6. Not just on the back of their draw mind you but more to do with the style the coach has his cattle playing.
by Motorboat » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:25 pm
hearts on fire wrote:Pressures on the Crows, other night on Footy Classified spoke about the finals chances and were labelled a certainty to make them and now also on the AFL site.... I know in recent years they have apparently had an "easy" draw too and have failed to do make finals but will this year be different?
I know Crows fans are pretty confident so far, and i have predicted them to make finals, but is their draw an unfair advantage playing GWS and Gold Coast twice.... Is there any other teams with this advantage?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/132712/default.aspx
by Rik E Boy » Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:50 pm
Booney wrote:Not a certainty, but they should finish in the top 6. Not just on the back of their draw mind you but more to do with the style the coach has his cattle playing.
by Media Park » Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:49 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by JK » Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:59 pm
MelbourneMedia Park wrote:Certainties:
Will not play finals: Port, GWS, GCS
by fish » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:01 pm
I'd add Carlton to that list...Media Park wrote:Certainties:
Will play finals: Geelong, Collingwood, Hawthorn
by Squids » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:07 pm
by cripple » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:09 pm
by fish » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:34 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:46 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:Not a certainty, but they should finish in the top 6. Not just on the back of their draw mind you but more to do with the style the coach has his cattle playing.
What do you expect. Get a Cat in charge and it's instant gunnage. Clearly Neeld has been tainted by the Pie environment and likewise McCartney at Essendon.![]()
regards,
REB
by Dirko » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:51 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:58 pm
by Dirko » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:The same clubs loaded up on unfair father/son draft picks
the same clubs tanked on the bottom of the ladder to gain priority draft picks
the same clubs benefit from a fixture that hardly sees them leave Melbourne
the same clubs benefited from the good old MCG finals clause that saw them host finals they never deserved,
the same clubs benefit from the exposure of stand alone games at prime times
the same clubs get away with flouting Extra Player Payment deals via their President, etc, etc.
Then they see another team getting something they want and they throw a 4yo's tantrum. Give me a break.
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:12 am
by clanger » Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:53 am
by Media Park » Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:02 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:Talking in a general manner, not saying that all of that applies to one club, even when most non Victorian clubs were in the top 8 the Victorian clubs were all whining even though everything was still loaded in their favour. Fathead Maguire has come out complaining that clubs that play GWS & GC twice in one season get an unfair advantage.
HELLOOOO. What the F has been happening to the benefit of Victorian clubs since the inception of the AFL?
The fixture is so bastardized and prostituted its beyond a joke. I don't think any Victorian clubs or their supporters that have benefited for so long have any real right to complain. Just because these things have happened under the guide lines or "rules" of the day it doesn't make it right.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |