holden78 wrote:Call it the ROXTEL Cup , where average clubs from SA can get their " Rox " off over nothing !
Great to see you're not above making sound contributions to the discussion '78
by beenreal » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:12 am
holden78 wrote:Call it the ROXTEL Cup , where average clubs from SA can get their " Rox " off over nothing !
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:34 am
holden78 wrote:Call it the ROXTEL Cup , where average clubs from SA can get their " Rox " off over nothing !
by holden78 » Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:37 pm
by doggies4eva » Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:43 pm
by rd » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:47 pm
doggies4eva wrote:All these arguments about whther this club or that club was better or worse off from participated are irrelvant to be quite frank.
This matter is about risk Vs reward.
The risk for an SANFL team with a legitimate chance of playing finals football is the risk of injury. The fact that last season most teams got through unscathed is irrelevant. The fact is they took a risk.
To overcome the risk for an SANFL club a greater level of prizmoney would certainly help, but so would guarantees of better levels of sponsor promotion for club sponsors. The risk for the doggies of alienating their key sponsor would be more of a consideration than the prizemoney.
But with our current finacial position a big pot of money at the end may well be enough to cover the various risks in being involved.
by once_were_warriors » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:09 pm
rd wrote:doggies4eva wrote:All these arguments about whther this club or that club was better or worse off from participated are irrelvant to be quite frank.
This matter is about risk Vs reward.
The risk for an SANFL team with a legitimate chance of playing finals football is the risk of injury. The fact that last season most teams got through unscathed is irrelevant. The fact is they took a risk.
To overcome the risk for an SANFL club a greater level of prizmoney would certainly help, but so would guarantees of better levels of sponsor promotion for club sponsors. The risk for the doggies of alienating their key sponsor would be more of a consideration than the prizemoney.
But with our current finacial position a big pot of money at the end may well be enough to cover the various risks in being involved.
Will Eagles, CD & Norwood players be allowed to play for the SANFL against WA in 2012 - or is that too risky?
by PhilH » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:18 pm
by beenreal » Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:55 pm
PhilH wrote:The state game is one match, where you represent your league in a game that is CLEARLY of a higher level than an SANFL game.
The state game commitment from each club would be at most say five players, 1 game ie 5pgs and you still get your club byes
The Foxtel Cup commitment could be 22 players for 4 games - 88pgs ... and currently your club gets NO byes.
There is history, honour and tradition in wearing a state jumper even in the AFL era.
Personally, I do not believe that the average Foxtel Cup game played in an empty stadium at 10.30am in the morning, broadcast by commentators who care or know little of the clubs or players, is a better product than your average SANFL league match.
As an example why did the North v Port Foxtel Cup Quarter Final at Adelaide Oval draw just 1500 when their league games at Prospect & Alberton usually average at least double that.
I have no issue with the clubs that see it as an opportunity, I hope they find ways to benefit from it and I hope the supporters of those clubs enjoy the experience .... but not every club sees it in that light.
by PhilH » Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:59 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:40 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:46 am
holden78 wrote:Its the ROX OFF Cup and everyone deep down knows it ! 2012 Premiership or Rox Off Cup , what would you rather ? Your playing with two pool cues in your pants if you honestly choose the latter ! Dont give me the runs
by Magpies96 » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:04 pm
by once_were_warriors » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:19 pm
Wedgie wrote:State game bigger than the Foxtel Cup? Give me a break.
Id travel to the othet side of the country to watch the Foxtel Cup where I didnt even make Adelaide Oval for the last state game.
And all those naysayers that go on about the prize money. I bet the clubs get more prize money from the Foxtel Cup than they do the State Game. In fact if I remember correctly it COSTS a lot of money to have a state game.
Nationally televised comp compared with a game televised in 2 states only because of a government subsidy. No comparison.
My sports mad daughter knows players from the Thunder and Labrador but wouldnt be able to name one Norwood or Glenelg player.
Foxtel Cup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> State game
by once_were_warriors » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:23 pm
Magpies96 wrote:So there is risks of getting injured in a Foxtel Cup game? So what about training then? You don’t get injured there?
As I said before, people are quick to say the AFL don’t care or do enough to promote the local leagues, but when they do (At a cost to them) they are snubbed by the SANFL’s top clubs. No one else Australia wide, just ours. Pretty poor if you ask me and the SANFL should do something about it because it is an embarrassment.
by holden78 » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:54 pm
beenreal wrote:holden78 wrote:Call it the ROXTEL Cup , where average clubs from SA can get their " Rox " off over nothing !
Great to see you're not above making sound contributions to the discussion '78
by CENTURION » Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:29 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:07 pm
by DOC » Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:17 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:20 pm
by CENTURION » Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |