by HOORAY PUNT » Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:58 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:59 pm
redandblack wrote:I said a while ago that it would be South, Port and West.
Still predict that.
by Dutchy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:29 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:That won't work . You cant force a team to compete that potentially would do more damage than good.It will turn if it is more attractive to particpate and when it demonstrates that you can be successful in both comps.
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:37 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:That won't work . You cant force a team to compete that potentially would do more damage than good.It will turn if it is more attractive to particpate and when it demonstrates that you can be successful in both comps.
by Hondo » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:39 pm
Dutchy wrote:Time for the SANFL to say we are either in or out, no half arsed acceptance of clubs that did not earn the right to compete and are unlikely to represent our great competition in a positive way.
by HOORAY PUNT » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:43 pm
Dutchy wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:That won't work . You cant force a team to compete that potentially would do more damage than good.It will turn if it is more attractive to particpate and when it demonstrates that you can be successful in both comps.
You certainly wouldnt force clubs to participate but a decision needs to be made by the SANFL and the clubs IMO, we are either IN or OUT and by IN means the top 3 clubs will participate.
by HOORAY PUNT » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:44 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:HOORAY PUNT wrote:That won't work . You cant force a team to compete that potentially would do more damage than good.It will turn if it is more attractive to particpate and when it demonstrates that you can be successful in both comps.
by Dutchy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:48 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:10 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:15 pm
HOORAY PUNT wrote:I understood your point , you may have missed mine .Not sure how the voting works but if it's carried by a majority you would be forcing teams to particpate then they would fill a second rate team which would be a poor reflection on our comp.
by HOORAY PUNT » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:18 pm
by PhilH » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:19 pm
by HOORAY PUNT » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:25 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:33 pm
by PhilH » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:39 pm
by Hondo » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:42 pm
Dutchy wrote:Hondo - Glenelg have never qualified for the comp.
by Dirko » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:46 pm
Hondo wrote:Given their form so far I conclude that they would decline if they finished top 3 so get stuck into them if you feel strongly about it.
by Hondo » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:47 pm
SJABC wrote:Hondo wrote:Given their form so far I conclude that they would decline if they finished top 3 so get stuck into them if you feel strongly about it.
I conclude you have no idea!
by Dirko » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:52 pm
Hondo wrote:So Glenelg are declining only because they technically didn't qualify in the first place?
Come on ....
Duthy is all fired up but conveniently excluding his own club from any blame it seems.
by Hondo » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:57 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |