whufc wrote:Am i seeing something different to me it looks like it lands abit short and he catches on the up.
A bit shocked it's given out TBH. Looked like another of those too close to call decisions.
by NFC » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:42 pm
whufc wrote:Am i seeing something different to me it looks like it lands abit short and he catches on the up.
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:43 pm
whufc wrote:Am i seeing something different to me it looks like it lands abit short and he catches on the up.
by whufc » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:43 pm
by Squids » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:43 pm
by jackpot jim » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:44 pm
NFC wrote:whufc wrote:Am i seeing something different to me it looks like it lands abit short and he catches on the up.
A bit shocked it's given out TBH. Looked like another of those too close to call decisions.
by NFC » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:44 pm
whufc wrote:Hughes technique flaws means he will never succed on a pitch which is offering alot for the bowlers.
by whufc » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:45 pm
Jim05 wrote:whufc wrote:Am i seeing something different to me it looks like it lands abit short and he catches on the up.
Im with you, i reckon it bounced
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:46 pm
by jackpot jim » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:47 pm
whufc wrote:Jim05 wrote:whufc wrote:Am i seeing something different to me it looks like it lands abit short and he catches on the up.
Im with you, i reckon it bounced
Yeah throw in Kallis's reaction (or lack of) who was the closest player to him and i dont reckon it was caught.
by whufc » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:49 pm
by rod_rooster » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:49 pm
by whufc » Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:53 pm
rod_rooster wrote:That was out. The catch was taken.
The only controversy about the Hughes dismissal should be about why he is there in the first place. Can anyone tell me they wouldn't be more confident with Katich opening the batting? Dare i say it but Hughes isn't even the best opening batsman from his state. He's behind Watson, Katich, Jaques, Maddinson and even Warner. Why the hell is this bloke playing Test cricket?
by rod_rooster » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:03 am
whufc wrote:rod_rooster wrote:That was out. The catch was taken.
The only controversy about the Hughes dismissal should be about why he is there in the first place. Can anyone tell me they wouldn't be more confident with Katich opening the batting? Dare i say it but Hughes isn't even the best opening batsman from his state. He's behind Watson, Katich, Jaques, Maddinson and even Warner. Why the hell is this bloke playing Test cricket?
A tad harsh on Hughes there.
Is averaging 50.16 at first class level and has hit 17 hundreds within 62 games.
Is this showing signs of players playing to much T20/50 over cricket heading into test series.
Whatever happened to the grinding 50 of 120 balls.
by Squids » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:04 am
by mal » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:05 am
rod_rooster wrote:That was out. The catch was taken.
The only controversy about the Hughes dismissal should be about why he is there in the first place. Can anyone tell me they wouldn't be more confident with Katich opening the batting? Dare i say it but Hughes isn't even the best opening batsman from his state. He's behind Watson, Katich, Jaques, Maddinson and even Warner. Why the hell is this bloke playing Test cricket?
by whufc » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:07 am
rod_rooster wrote:whufc wrote:rod_rooster wrote:That was out. The catch was taken.
The only controversy about the Hughes dismissal should be about why he is there in the first place. Can anyone tell me they wouldn't be more confident with Katich opening the batting? Dare i say it but Hughes isn't even the best opening batsman from his state. He's behind Watson, Katich, Jaques, Maddinson and even Warner. Why the hell is this bloke playing Test cricket?
A tad harsh on Hughes there.
Is averaging 50.16 at first class level and has hit 17 hundreds within 62 games.
Is this showing signs of players playing to much T20/50 over cricket heading into test series.
Whatever happened to the grinding 50 of 120 balls.
If i'm being harsh on Hughes what have the selectors done to Katich? Also to Jaques? Average of 47.47 with 3 hundreds and 6 fifties in 11 tests. None of the players i mentioned (even Warner) have such obvious technical flaws that are so easily exploited as what Hughes has. Hughes has a good eye but you need more than that at Test level. I also only mentioned NSW players. Chris Rogers is sitting at home shaking his head wondering if he had blonde tips, a couple of diamond earrings and unjustified arrogance, how far he could have gone.
by Jim05 » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:07 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |