Prelim Final Discussion

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby NFC » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:48 pm

udogs01 wrote:PS....Thank God for Centrals, without them this comp would be sooooo boring.
Boring game today, boring crowd.

The ironing is delicious.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby gadj1976 » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:49 pm

NFC wrote:
udogs01 wrote:PS....Thank God for Centrals, without them this comp would be sooooo boring.
Boring game today, boring crowd.

The ironing is delicious.


that's GOLD!
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9347
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 826 times
Been liked: 898 times

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby Dogwatcher » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:51 pm

gadj1976 wrote:The SANFL is getting very boring. IMO, full time coaches trying to implement full time game plans with part time players means that there is lots of strategy and not much logic being used.

The past three games I've watched of SANFL finals footy would have to be the worst exhibition of football SA has produced for ages.

Anyone who thinks that this style of football is better than the AFL is kidding themselves.


Could that be why Roy is so successful? Uncomplicated, with no eye to a future job in the AFL?
Old ground, it's been discussed plenty of times before.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby gadj1976 » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:54 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:
gadj1976 wrote:The SANFL is getting very boring. IMO, full time coaches trying to implement full time game plans with part time players means that there is lots of strategy and not much logic being used.

The past three games I've watched of SANFL finals footy would have to be the worst exhibition of football SA has produced for ages.

Anyone who thinks that this style of football is better than the AFL is kidding themselves.


Could that be why Roy is so successful? Uncomplicated, with no eye to a future job in the AFL?
Old ground, it's been discussed plenty of times before.


Don't know. But I for one am getting very tired of the Dogs winning and boring finals being played in the leadup.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9347
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 826 times
Been liked: 898 times

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby Dogwatcher » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:55 pm

Well...there's one thing your club can do about it ;)

What have the past few preliminary final crowds been like?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby CENTURION » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:56 pm

whufc wrote:From an outside point of view Bassett didnt recruit and then failed to make the changes to suit the squad.

Not having Pupoplo and Duigan was a huge amount of run, carry and pace to lose from the defensive 50, none of the recruits were ultra quick or attacking defenders in the same mould.

What i saw in the second semi was that the game plan hadn't adjusted and the difference this year was while they were chipping around in the back half they didnt have that explosive player willing to break the lines and play on as Pup and Duigan did last year.

Either he had to recruit to the structure or change the structure to suit the squad he had.

He recruited, just hard to cover the quality that he lost. Honestly, I didn't give Norwood a chance of making the 5 this year!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby sjt » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:56 pm

gadj1976 wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:
gadj1976 wrote:The SANFL is getting very boring. IMO, full time coaches trying to implement full time game plans with part time players means that there is lots of strategy and not much logic being used.

The past three games I've watched of SANFL finals footy would have to be the worst exhibition of football SA has produced for ages.

Anyone who thinks that this style of football is better than the AFL is kidding themselves.


Could that be why Roy is so successful? Uncomplicated, with no eye to a future job in the AFL?
Old ground, it's been discussed plenty of times before.


Don't know. But I for one am getting very tired of the Dogs winning and boring finals being played in the leadup.


Yeh, like last year? How many games were decided by less than 12 points (including the GF).
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby bulldog2004 » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:57 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:Well...there's one thing your club can do about it ;)

What have the past few preliminary final crowds been like?

Bout 8 to10 thousand.
bulldog2004
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby southee » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:58 pm

gadj1976 wrote:The SANFL is getting very boring. IMO, full time coaches trying to implement full time game plans with part time players means that there is lots of strategy and not much logic being used.

The past three games I've watched of SANFL finals footy would have to be the worst exhibition of football SA has produced for ages.

Anyone who thinks that this style of football is better than the AFL is kidding themselves.


If Sturt were in the GF ....you would not be posting that!!! :roll:

Its up to the other 8 clubs to take it up to Centrals...so far we have all failed.

Hope it changes over this weekend.
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby PhilH » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:59 pm

As someone who spruiks the crowds I will say my piece.

Today' crowd very disapointing given same teams, same ground, good weather and yet 1800 less.

Long weekend may have been a factor but who turned up last year yet didn't come along in 2011?

As for the final series we are yet to have a game that really captures the imagination and gets people talking

Having South's season ended and Centrals drominating last weekend was probably the worst combination for the prelim matchup becoming a major talking point in AFL GF week.

Only highlights are if you are a South supporter (making and winning a final)
or an Eagles fan (getting back to the GF after 5 seasons)

Central fans only care about 1 game & that is next week, eveyone else would feel disapointed.

Last year we were blessed with a great prelim and the best GF in a decade.

In 2008 & 09 we saw some great Central wins in the finals from difficult positions.

Maybe this year's relatively boring series is the trade off.
User avatar
PhilH
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:04 am
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 163 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby Pseudo » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:59 pm

sjt wrote:
gadj1976 wrote:Don't know. But I for one am getting very tired of the Dogs winning and boring finals being played in the leadup.


Yeh, like last year? How many games were decided by less than 12 points (including the GF).


Or the year before, when the GF was the only game which wasn't decided by less than 12 points.

Much more exciting than the Foxtel Cup, I think you'll all agree.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby Dogwatcher » Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:59 pm

NFC wrote:
udogs01 wrote:PS....Thank God for Centrals, without them this comp would be sooooo boring.
Boring game today, boring crowd.

The ironing is delicious.


Shouldn't taste delicious to you and yours, though.

Must admit, I also found it funny.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby CENTURION » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:02 pm

Pseudo wrote:
sjt wrote:
gadj1976 wrote:Don't know. But I for one am getting very tired of the Dogs winning and boring finals being played in the leadup.


Yeh, like last year? How many games were decided by less than 12 points (including the GF).


Or the year before, when the GF was the only game which wasn't decided by less than 12 points.

Much more exciting than the Foxtel Cup, I think you'll all agree.

INDUBITABLY, PSEUDO OLD SON!!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby The Apostle » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:13 pm

The Apostle AK wrote:
CENTURION wrote:So.......where are the taunts & jibes of Spionkopster & Staritski? It's ok, I won't have a go at you but you could at least appear & take the good with the bad. I'll not mention Norwoodman78, he seems to have mellowed of late. ;)

Adelaide Hawk, Fester69, Topsy Waldron...

Oh, and JAS as well...
The Apostle
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby CENTURION » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:16 pm

The Apostle AK wrote:
The Apostle AK wrote:
CENTURION wrote:So.......where are the taunts & jibes of Spionkopster & Staritski? It's ok, I won't have a go at you but you could at least appear & take the good with the bad. I'll not mention Norwoodman78, he seems to have mellowed of late. ;)

Adelaide Hawk, Fester69, Topsy Waldron...

Oh, and JAS as well...

yep, respect to NFC, must be gutted but he's on here, copping it on the chin......and dishing it out!!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby JK » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:18 pm

whufc wrote:From an outside point of view Bassett didnt recruit and then failed to make the changes to suit the squad.

Not having Pupoplo and Duigan was a huge amount of run, carry and pace to lose from the defensive 50, none of the recruits were ultra quick or attacking defenders in the same mould.

What i saw in the second semi was that the game plan hadn't adjusted and the difference this year was while they were chipping around in the back half they didnt have that explosive player willing to break the lines and play on as Pup and Duigan did last year.

Either he had to recruit to the structure or change the structure to suit the squad he had.


Perhaps not quite to the same extent as Puopolo, Luke Brown was pretty handy in the role for most of the season until it was decided he was needed up the front late in the year .. I know playing numbers behind the ball can mask some deficiencies at the back, but I thought that was the area of least concern for us - The midfield and up forward were badly exposed.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby Dogwatcher » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:18 pm

JK and CK have been on too.
Good on 'em.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby CENTURION » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:20 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:JK and CK have been on too.
Good on 'em.

I don't include JK because i know deep down he is a Centrals fan.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby JK » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:22 pm

CENTURION wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:JK and CK have been on too.
Good on 'em.

I don't include JK because i know deep down he is a Centrals fan.


I feel so dirty
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Prelim Final Discussion

Postby Dogwatcher » Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:22 pm

We should nickname you, "Macca", then.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

cron