by rod_rooster » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:21 am
by rod_rooster » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:45 am
by Rik E Boy » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:17 am
by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:49 am
by RoosterMarty » Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:10 pm
by JK » Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:28 pm
by mal » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:19 pm
by ORDoubleBlues » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:57 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:44 am
by mal » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
rod_rooster wrote:Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by rod_rooster » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:57 am
mal wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
HAYDENS best innings in o/d cricket
This was a big oval and geez he hit some massive sixes
GILCHRIST needs to push singles for him
by mal » Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:07 am
by Grahaml » Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:40 pm
by mal » Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:30 pm
Grahaml wrote:Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7
by rod_rooster » Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:53 pm
mal wrote:Grahaml wrote:Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7
Good to have another person who knows his cricket posting, good post.
Believe it or not I am a WATSON fan, but he can wait until the others retire
He will still be aged in his mid twenties by then
by mal » Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:55 pm
by am Bays » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:00 am
by rod_rooster » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:18 am
mal wrote:Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?
by mal » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:20 am
rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?
Mal you go on about Watson making that 201 in a Shield final. Maher made 223. 2 other guys (Love and Perren) made 150 plus. Yes it was a good effort but making a double ton does not mean you are deserving of a place in the Australian side. FFS Old made 6/900 hardly any demonds in the batting surface and hardly a lot of pressure on the batsmen knowing what a commanding position they were in.
Anyway answer to your question mal, he wasn't out he retired hurt. Surprise surprise. Would be a great shame if Australia lost the World Cup Final being only 9 wickets down with Watto unable to make it to the crease.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |