Matt the Bat

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Matt the Bat

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:21 am

Haydos is a star. Plenty of doubts have been cast over him before this World Cup. Some even suggested Watson should replace him at the top of the order. Not even in Shane Watson's wildests dreams could he do what Haydos is currently doing to the South African attack.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:45 am

Well now he has the fastest hundred in World Cup history. Great performance.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:17 am

He should have gone on to 150. I'm nine points from the top of my dream team ladder but I should be in front. Back to the nets Matty! :wink:

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28490
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Postby Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:49 am

And John Davison's moment of fame in the cricket world slips away...
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby RoosterMarty » Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:10 pm

During the CB series people doubted whether he should open the batting at the World Cup then in NZ he scores the highest score ever by an Aussie in one dayers, then goes to the World Cup and scores the fastest 100 by an Aussie and fastest 100 in a World Cup. He didn't do it against a minnow either, he saved his best for the biggest game of the World Cup so far. Hopefully he can keep this up, a flying start by Haydos and Gilly will make us tough to beat.
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Postby JK » Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:28 pm

I gotta put my hand up as one who'd doubted whether Matty Hayden could still be the same player as a few years back.

Well having watched his knock the other night I'm happy in knowing those doubts were illfounded ... What an innings!!
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby mal » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:19 pm

HAYDEN deserves his spot and recognition for some marvellous
record breaking feats.
This is by no means detrimental but that fastest 100 ever was on
a primary school ground on a flat track.
He is the BEST flat track bully Ive seen playing cricket.

ROD Mr WATSON would need to play out of his skin to be as good as HAYDEN.
WATSON cant bludgeon an attack of that quality as does Matty.
But Matty cant bowl [as dosent HODGE] and thats why WATSON gets a game.
On seaming pitches WATSON could be as good as HAYDEN as an opener and
his bowling would be more venemous[As it was in India on seaming decks]


BREAKING NEWS
----------------------

Brilliant NZ opener Lou VINCENT has broken his wrist at practice
and will be out of the World Cup.
That is a devastating blow to the NZ chances.
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29771
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2003 times
Been liked: 1987 times

Postby rod_rooster » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:31 pm

I'll argue that Watson can't bowl either mal :lol: :wink:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:57 pm

I'll put my hand up as well for saying that Hayden should have been dropped.
After that one dayer here in Adelaide a couple of months ago, I felt strongly that he had to go but he's certainly made me eat my words since with at least 3 100's, perhaps 4?
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3261
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 15 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:44 am

Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby mal » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am

rod_rooster wrote:Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>


HAYDENS best innings in o/d cricket
This was a big oval and geez he hit some massive sixes
GILCHRIST needs to push singles for him
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29771
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2003 times
Been liked: 1987 times

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:57 am

mal wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>


HAYDENS best innings in o/d cricket
This was a big oval and geez he hit some massive sixes
GILCHRIST needs to push singles for him


Will be a big run chase for the opposition if both Hayden and Gilchrist get going. :shock:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby mal » Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:07 am

Im impressed ROD
You must be drinking lots of Green Tea, you are spot on
You predicted HAYDO as being a star and your judgement has been vindicated 2 innings in a row.
Just think if GILLY retires imagine a HAYDEN/WATSON opening combination :wink:
They batted once together and made 150 odd partnership.
HAYDEN made that record o/d score that day[WATSON nursed him through early :lol: ]
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29771
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2003 times
Been liked: 1987 times

Postby Grahaml » Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:40 pm

Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Postby mal » Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:30 pm

Grahaml wrote:Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7


Good to have another person who knows his cricket posting, good post.

Believe it or not I am a WATSON fan, but he can wait until the others retire
He will still be aged in his mid twenties by then
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29771
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2003 times
Been liked: 1987 times

Postby rod_rooster » Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:53 pm

mal wrote:
Grahaml wrote:Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7


Good to have another person who knows his cricket posting, good post.

Believe it or not I am a WATSON fan, but he can wait until the others retire
He will still be aged in his mid twenties by then


He'll be well and truly finished by then mal :wink:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby mal » Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:55 pm

Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29771
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2003 times
Been liked: 1987 times

Postby am Bays » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:00 am

Matt Hayden would be close to player of the tournament at the minute. Only two who would come close would be Jayasuria and Malinga from Sri Lanka...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19615
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2082 times

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:18 am

mal wrote:Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?


Mal you go on about Watson making that 201 in a Shield final. Maher made 223. 2 other guys (Love and Perren) made 150 plus. Yes it was a good effort but making a double ton does not mean you are deserving of a place in the Australian side. FFS Old made 6/900 hardly any demonds in the batting surface and hardly a lot of pressure on the batsmen knowing what a commanding position they were in.

Anyway answer to your question mal, he wasn't out he retired hurt. Surprise surprise. Would be a great shame if Australia lost the World Cup Final being only 9 wickets down with Watto unable to make it to the crease.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby mal » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:20 am

rod_rooster wrote:
mal wrote:Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?


Mal you go on about Watson making that 201 in a Shield final. Maher made 223. 2 other guys (Love and Perren) made 150 plus. Yes it was a good effort but making a double ton does not mean you are deserving of a place in the Australian side. FFS Old made 6/900 hardly any demonds in the batting surface and hardly a lot of pressure on the batsmen knowing what a commanding position they were in.

Anyway answer to your question mal, he wasn't out he retired hurt. Surprise surprise. Would be a great shame if Australia lost the World Cup Final being only 9 wickets down with Watto unable to make it to the crease.


201 "RETIRED HURT" is my inference :butthead:
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29771
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2003 times
Been liked: 1987 times

Next

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |