Mead and Port part ways

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby sjt » Sun Aug 14, 2011 9:06 am

on the rails wrote:
jim5112 wrote: Centrals sack seconds players all the time. There is no point in keeping them if they are not likely to become good league players.


All clubs do however I would think that it would be a decision made by all the Senior Coachs and agreed where as from what NM has stated the decision clearly was not mutual at the Magpies?

I can't recall centrals ever sacking six or so players with a few rounds left. Why bother? Why not just not play them, and let them play for their local team. I can only imagine it leads to disunity the way they've gone about it. Seems a bit bizarre the way it's been explained so far. I do agree however that the coach has to do what he deems best for the league side, just don't see how this way is. Unless they Are all fringe players that haven't really played and aren't going to?
Anyway, any nason or Jenner types amongst them? We could do with a tall forward.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:01 am

sjt wrote:Anyway, any nason or Jenner types amongst them? We could do with a tall forward.


Was thinking the same thing.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby bayman » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:12 pm

G wrote:I agree with Bamfords thinking as its all about the League sides development, although the action taken with the U'18s is slightly puzzling.

bayman, one day you will realise that virtually NO ONE gives a rats toss bag about the results in the Seconds except the players involved :oops: :oops:


G, read what i wrote :roll: :roll: :oops: :oops:
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby wobat head » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:04 pm

I just feel so disappointed with this entire issue, since Port become one club there has not been much that has gone right, the reserves and under 18's are at least winning games of football. No matter who is right and who is wrong for a reigning premership coach to leave the club this close to the end of the season is a classic example of how Port is being administered. There is nothing wrong with the coaching staff having different opinions but these differences should of been sorted out during pre-season not this close to finals particuarly since it is both Meads and Banfords second year. Looking completely from the outside both Mead and Bandford come across as squibbling school boys. For them not to be able to mediate an outcome to at least to the end of the season so that the club is not disrupted particualarly while the league is attempting to play finals unfortunately shows there is a lack of leadership at Alberton bring back Matthew Knights ( I meant everything except the knights bit )
wobat head
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:35 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby Macca19 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 5:54 pm

I think its fair enough but im just not sure about the timing of it and whether it will destabilise the playing group.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby mickey » Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:30 pm

Interested to see Mead in the grandstands after the game
User avatar
mickey
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5694
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:54 pm
Location: Playing Poker
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 323 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby Big Phil » Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:39 pm

mickey wrote:Interested to see Mead in the grandstands after the game


In his Port gear?
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20297
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby mickey » Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:43 pm

No but in the players section in front of the coaches box
User avatar
mickey
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5694
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:54 pm
Location: Playing Poker
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 323 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby Big Phil » Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:44 pm

mickey wrote:No but in the players section in front of the coaches box


Interesting.
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20297
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby SANFLnut » Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:42 pm

Any idea of the changes to Maggies reserves side this week or who the players sacked were? Has Tim Milera quit the club?
SANFLnut
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 65 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby GWW » Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:44 pm

List of players who played in Port's Reserves side today..

http://www.sportingpulse.com/round_info ... 5-0&pool=1
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15675
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 816 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby bulldog2004 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 10:28 pm

Big Phil wrote:Just out of curiosity NM, who were the fringe players told they were no longer required?Also, who will take over from Mead for the remainder of the season?

Two ex Port players, Michael Clinch and Cameron Miller, are now playing at Bute. Whether this is due to them being told they are not required im not sure.
bulldog2004
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby RustyCage » Sun Aug 14, 2011 10:44 pm

bulldog2004 wrote:
Big Phil wrote:Just out of curiosity NM, who were the fringe players told they were no longer required?Also, who will take over from Mead for the remainder of the season?

Two ex Port players, Michael Clinch and Cameron Miller, are now playing at Bute. Whether this is due to them being told they are not required im not sure.


Miller left a while back.

Players I noticed weren't there today were Watson, Weetra, Hall, Watts and Tim Milera
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15300
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1267 times
Been liked: 937 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby jim5112 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:41 pm

NO-MERCY wrote:
jim5112 wrote:Centrals sack seconds players all the time. There is no point in keeping them if they are not likely to become good league players.


Mate i'm hearing you but you don't go cleaning out your cupboard 4 weeks from finals & if your B's & 18's are top you must have some good depth.


I don't actually know or care why, but if their U18 are so strong, perhaps the coach wants to move on a few that were only reserves standard to make some room for the juniors to develop.

... or perhaps Bamford is a SANFL spy, and trying to cause bitterness and turmoil and help the downward spiral to oblivion by making decisions that are not popular with his support staff.
jim5112
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby BUZZ » Mon Aug 15, 2011 8:13 am

pafc1870 wrote:
bulldog2004 wrote:
Big Phil wrote:Just out of curiosity NM, who were the fringe players told they were no longer required?Also, who will take over from Mead for the remainder of the season?

Two ex Port players, Michael Clinch and Cameron Miller, are now playing at Bute. Whether this is due to them being told they are not required im not sure.


Miller left a while back.

Players I noticed weren't there today were Watson, Weetra, Hall, Watts and Tim Milera

These 3 players I believe have been told they will not be invited to training next year.
User avatar
BUZZ
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:37 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby Hodges 153! » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:17 am

BUZZ wrote:
pafc1870 wrote:Players I noticed weren't there today were Watson, Weetra, Hall, Watts and Tim Milera

These 3 players I believe have been told they will not be invited to training next year.


Watson has been named in the best players in the last 4 games, and Weetra in 3 of the 4.

:roll:

At this stage of the year, how can the Reserves be putting any selection pressure on the League side, if the ones that are outperfoming the rest are told they aren't good enough?

I can see the philosophy in having the lower grades developing young guys, but no sense in making these cuts at this time of year.
Hodges 153!
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 2:05 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby MatteeG » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:28 am

BUZZ wrote:These 3 players I believe have been told they will not be invited to training next year.


Why would you tell them this now and not in 6 weeks time?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 519 times
Been liked: 510 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby Slots It Through » Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:16 am

MatteeG wrote:
BUZZ wrote:These 3 players I believe have been told they will not be invited to training next year.


Why would you tell them this now and not in 6 weeks time?


You now have 6 weeks to play some quality U18s in the reserves who may push to play league football next year.
These decisions do not happen overnight, they are big decisions. Your footy club is measured on the league side, so everything you do below should be to improve that league side, and i am sure the people involved have this in mind.
Slots It Through
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby Wedgie » Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:19 am

I don't have a problem with the philosophy with what has explained to be the cause, I can understand the club's philosophy and I can understand Mead being attached to some of those players and feeling cheated on. BUT, what I do question is the timing. The timing of it makes me think that there has to be something else behind it too.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Mead and Port part ways

Postby Booney » Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:20 am

Might have been a bit going on in the rooms before the 18's on Saturday too.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60938
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8045 times
Been liked: 11720 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |