by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:19 pm
by words of wisdom » Mon Jun 13, 2011 5:21 pm
by footyislife » Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:20 am
by bigbadkenny » Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:13 am
by Big Fulla » Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:41 pm
footyislife wrote:They should play RIVERLAND ,MALLEE ,OR THE MIDSOUTHEAST because they cant compete with the stronger Leagues its a mickymouse league WOW
by Goldberg » Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:20 pm
by From The Outer » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:29 pm
by Goldberg » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:11 pm
by slug » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:24 pm
Big Fulla wrote:Pffft, what a ridiculous comment.
It potentially could be stronger but with who's available is quite a balanced lined up.
by the watcher » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:30 pm
by Big Fulla » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:36 pm
by GWW » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:46 pm
Big Fulla wrote:Moving on, looking forward to this weeks games. Tailem Bend FC are having an Indigenous Round where they are announcing their Indigenous Team of the Century. Some truly great names from across the years will be acknowledged. A great concept by the club.
by RyderCourtney » Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:04 pm
Goldberg wrote:I dont think anyone should be MADE TO PLAY in these games, but it is interesting to think that about a team of Unavailables! Would have easily accounted for the team we sent IMO.
Forward: Girardi Kennedy Ladhams
1/2 F: Viney Benbow Austin
Centre McDonnell Hall Hodge
1/2 B: Cunneen Coulter Braun
Back: Weyland ????? Eckermann
1st: Bowen, White, Brunoli
Inter: Girdham, Bartlett,
by footyislife » Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:14 am
Big Fulla wrote:footyislife wrote:They should play RIVERLAND ,MALLEE ,OR THE MIDSOUTHEAST because they cant compete with the stronger Leagues its a mickymouse league WOW
Are you saying the RMFL is a Mickey Mouse league? We did have at least 10 of the comps best players unavailable which would change the result quite dramatically.
by RyderCourtney » Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:42 am
footyislife wrote:Big Fulla wrote:footyislife wrote:They should play RIVERLAND ,MALLEE ,OR THE MIDSOUTHEAST because they cant compete with the stronger Leagues its a mickymouse league WOW
Are you saying the RMFL is a Mickey Mouse league? We did have at least 10 of the comps best players unavailable which would change the result quite dramatically.
The RMFL has just been playing GSFL for years and hasnt been able to beat them so so how does it think it can compete with the strength of the SFL . Even if the all leagues could put there best sides out the RMFL would not be able to compete . Its a joke in country football that a league with 7teams has final 5
by Big Fulla » Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:36 am
RyderCourtney wrote:footyislife wrote:Big Fulla wrote:footyislife wrote:They should play RIVERLAND ,MALLEE ,OR THE MIDSOUTHEAST because they cant compete with the stronger Leagues its a mickymouse league WOW
Are you saying the RMFL is a Mickey Mouse league? We did have at least 10 of the comps best players unavailable which would change the result quite dramatically.
The RMFL has just been playing GSFL for years and hasnt been able to beat them so so how does it think it can compete with the strength of the SFL . Even if the all leagues could put there best sides out the RMFL would not be able to compete . Its a joke in country football that a league with 7teams has final 5
Agreed it's a joke that we have a final 5.
by RyderCourtney » Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:09 pm
????? Why is it a joke????? Ridiculous statement. The current finals model is fine. And as is the case this year, the gap between 1st and 7th is not as significant as what it may have been in previous years. The competition is healthy.
With the proposed growth to Murray Bridge there will more than likely be the inclusion of a new club to meet demand but until then current RMFL Committee and Clubs should continue to work hard to develop a standard which brings people through the gates. The standard in 2011 so far has been quite exciting and positive.
by Big Fulla » Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:23 pm
by RyderCourtney » Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:44 pm
Big Fulla wrote:My point exactly, last year. In any organisation their must be a framework, this is the right framework. I'd rather quality than quantity. It shouldn't decline from this point going forward.
by words of wisdom » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:11 pm
RyderCourtney wrote:Big Fulla wrote:My point exactly, last year. In any organisation their must be a framework, this is the right framework. I'd rather quality than quantity. It shouldn't decline from this point going forward.
Not really understanding you Big Fulla. THIS YEAR for example at the half way mark Mypo are again in 5th position and and again on track to a 6-10 mark. If youd rather quality then surely a top four would create a better quality come finals time instead of the token 5th side to create an extra couple of games for revenue.
The league has been declining for years now, im not sure its going to recover quite so quickly.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |