by The Apostle » Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:10 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Jun 12, 2011 5:43 pm
by NO-MERCY » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:02 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Typical Centrals mid-season win - start out strong in the first, take the foot off the pedal in the second, then do enough in the third and fourth to get the win. Port, to their credit, gave Centrals a good run for their money and the win ended up being a bit more hard fought than what was expected. Not much else to say about the game really.
by Dogwatcher » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:09 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:11 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Brucetiki wrote:Typical Centrals mid-season win - start out strong in the first, take the foot off the pedal in the second, then do enough in the third and fourth to get the win. Port, to their credit, gave Centrals a good run for their money and the win ended up being a bit more hard fought than what was expected. Not much else to say about the game really.
Give some credit to the opposition.
by NO-MERCY » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:28 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I don't think he's not giving credit to the opposition, NM. The stats shown by Scott reflect that a little.
by CENTURION » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:33 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:CK wrote:I felt old yesterday, that's for sure, with a big jumper and a beanie, complete with reading glasses. Must have looked like a tall version of Linus Van Pelt
For me it was borderline putting-on-the-jumper territory all day...walked to the ground with just jeans and a guernsey over the top of a t-shirt but during the match i'd put a jumper on, then take it off after 10 minutes...
by CENTURION » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:37 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:50 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:53 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Port, to their credit, gave Centrals a good run for their money and the win ended up being a bit more hard fought than what was expected.
Dogwatcher wrote:I wouldn't suggest that Bruce thinks it is deliberate.
More there's something going on within the side where they're drifting off in the second quarter. Seems they've been doing it for much of this season so far.
by whufc » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:01 pm
by CENTURION » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:16 pm
whufc wrote:Andrew Hayes out 4-10 weeks.
Apparently he did this once before when playing in Sydney and it kept him out for the year.
by Dogwatcher » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:19 pm
by CENTURION » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:24 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:flip.
what's the injury count now?
hmmm...do people still think we're certainties to win?
by Big Phil » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:38 pm
whufc wrote:Andrew Hayes out 4-10 weeks.
Apparently he did this once before when playing in Sydney and it kept him out for the year.
by csbowes » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:42 pm
CENTURION wrote:I bet when We play your mob at Elizabeth YOU won't be there!
by csbowes » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:46 pm
CENTURION wrote:you're such a sillius soddus sometimes. We lost last week, JUST beat North the week before, struggled to beat Port yesterday! The way we're going at the moment, We are a real chance of losing next week!
by CENTURION » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:58 pm
csbowes wrote:CENTURION wrote:I bet when We play your mob at Elizabeth YOU won't be there!
What would you like to wager?
by csbowes » Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:03 pm
CENTURION wrote:csbowes wrote:CENTURION wrote:I bet when We play your mob at Elizabeth YOU won't be there!
What would you like to wager?
when was the last time you went to Elizbf Oval? You have to admit Our form is a bit off at the moment. PLUS We have ANOTHER long-term injury!
by CENTURION » Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:04 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |