RMFL this is a joke!! If it was the Prelim, would u wait until the Grandfinal is played before sitting at the tribuneral. NO!!
Show some balls for god sake
If he is found guilty- Cannot coach (from within the grounds), but yes will be paid

by Goldberg » Thu May 19, 2011 10:06 am
by RyderCourtney » Thu May 19, 2011 12:57 pm
Goldberg wrote:I for 1 cannot believe they are waiting a week to sort this out. What happens if he kicks 10 this week & wins the game for Jervois. Surely Mannum would be fuming. Should be done tonight or Friday night at the latest.
RMFL this is a joke!! If it was the Prelim, would u wait until the Grandfinal is played before sitting at the tribuneral. NO!!
Show some balls for god sake
If he is found guilty- Cannot coach (from within the grounds), but yes will be paid
by slug » Thu May 19, 2011 1:19 pm
by Goldberg » Thu May 19, 2011 2:34 pm
by Footsview » Thu May 19, 2011 4:58 pm
Seagull wrote:biffboy wrote:From The Outer wrote:Chris Ladhams will face the RMFL tribunal Tuesday night. By all reports he is in a deal of trouble. Apparently he is free to play this week however.
This one will be very interesting to watch. I'm sure there will be some boys at mannum licking there lips at the opportunity to stir him up and there wont be alot he can do.
I wonder if Jervois will keep paying him if he gets rubbed out for a decent period of time. And there begs another question, is he still allowed to coach?
Cannot hold any official position when under suspension, not even as a water boy. This should also preclude him from entering the changerooms if the law is upheld correctly.
by jstlookin » Thu May 19, 2011 5:09 pm
by the watcher » Thu May 19, 2011 5:15 pm
by Goldberg » Thu May 19, 2011 5:29 pm
the watcher wrote:Instead of bagging the RMFL perhaps we should be thankful that they have a clause in the constitution to handle these incidents and that they are prepared to act on it.
by the watcher » Thu May 19, 2011 5:44 pm
by slug » Thu May 19, 2011 5:54 pm
the watcher wrote:They are very delicate cases with specific processes that need to be adhered to.
The RMFL commisioners (Coventry, Gigger and Zadow)take over procedings and i can assure you Ken Coventry is a stickler for rules and procedures.
There are no favours when those guys are in the chair.
I believe the Lucket incident was witnessed by an official which helped in that case.
I suggest we all get on with things and let people do their jobs.
by biffboy » Thu May 19, 2011 11:26 pm
slug wrote:the watcher wrote:They are very delicate cases with specific processes that need to be adhered to.
The RMFL commisioners (Coventry, Gigger and Zadow)take over procedings and i can assure you Ken Coventry is a stickler for rules and procedures.
There are no favours when those guys are in the chair.
I believe the Lucket incident was witnessed by an official which helped in that case.
I suggest we all get on with things and let people do their jobs.
we will see won't we,my money is on 3 weeks anyone else 8!
by GWW » Thu May 19, 2011 11:30 pm
Seagull wrote:Cannot hold any official position when under suspension, not even as a water boy. This should also preclude him from entering the changerooms if the law is upheld correctly.
by GWW » Fri May 20, 2011 12:06 am
Mr_Willy wrote:GWW wrote:I managed to catch the Tailem v Jervois game on Saturday.
Some observations:
- both clubs rely on a core of key players (in particular Ladhams for Jervois and Wark for Tailem), however both clubs have much improved depth compared to last season
- Owen Love would be one of the longest kicks of the footy I've seen in country football- Jervois' first quarter, particularly their inaccuracy, probably cost them the game.
- Tailem's attack was impressive to kick over 20 goals, however it was their defence that impressed me.
- the umpires - well I'll be diplomatic and won't comment on the umpiring.
There is a video on YouTube from last years Aboiriginal Carnival. Owen, playing for Raukkan, kicked a goal from near the centre circle at Imps towards the freeway end - must've been a 70m+ kick.... Absolute booming kick.
by biffboy » Fri May 20, 2011 12:45 am
by Mr_Willy » Fri May 20, 2011 10:00 am
by Wynarka » Fri May 20, 2011 1:49 pm
by ftandsq » Fri May 20, 2011 2:49 pm
Wynarka wrote:Just got the word Michael Sumner & possibly Muffy to Tailem, can anyone shed light on this. Plus I know if you have played juniors at a club you become a zero pointer, but just how many games do you have to play both as a senior or junior at a club? I was under the understanding its 25, & if this is correct, would Sumner attract any points for Tailem? They are already 3 over their allotment
by hawksnest » Fri May 20, 2011 4:57 pm
by GWW » Fri May 20, 2011 5:10 pm
by hawksnest » Fri May 20, 2011 5:31 pm
ftandsq wrote:Wynarka wrote:Just got the word Michael Sumner & possibly Muffy to Tailem, can anyone shed light on this. Plus I know if you have played juniors at a club you become a zero pointer, but just how many games do you have to play both as a senior or junior at a club? I was under the understanding its 25, & if this is correct, would Sumner attract any points for Tailem? They are already 3 over their allotment
Gee Michael Sumner was chatting to a club in hills but said he wouldnt play for ANY LESS than a nominated high amount of coin! Good luck to him if he can get it, the money tree at Tailem Bend must have blossomed!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |