by turbo182 » Mon May 16, 2011 1:22 pm
by HawkieRanger » Mon May 16, 2011 2:12 pm
Choccies wrote:Mitcham too good for us on the weekend but the scoreboard probably doesn't reflect the better effort from us with around 9 changes to the A's this week. Mitcham romped home with 8 goals in the last quarter but we tried hard all day. Missing a few set shots early probably didn't help us gather any momentum but I think we were alot better than the scoreboard showed. A good, hard at it team are Mitcham, in both the A's and B's and both games played in pretty good spirit. They just had a bit more class and consistency around the ground in the end. Hoping that we build on what we showed yesterday when we take on Pooraka in a triple header on Saturday.
by SATCHEL » Mon May 16, 2011 2:41 pm
by flash » Mon May 16, 2011 3:01 pm
by Johno6 » Mon May 16, 2011 3:39 pm
HawkieRanger wrote:Choccies wrote:Mitcham too good for us on the weekend but the scoreboard probably doesn't reflect the better effort from us with around 9 changes to the A's this week. Mitcham romped home with 8 goals in the last quarter but we tried hard all day. Missing a few set shots early probably didn't help us gather any momentum but I think we were alot better than the scoreboard showed. A good, hard at it team are Mitcham, in both the A's and B's and both games played in pretty good spirit. They just had a bit more class and consistency around the ground in the end. Hoping that we build on what we showed yesterday when we take on Pooraka in a triple header on Saturday.
First half was a pretty a close contest, we only came in a goal up at half time. GG flooded our forward line which really kept them in the game, as our use going forward was poor and we continually hit their players. Second half was a different story, we came out and took complete control of the game, kicking away in the end to win by 10 +. A few injuries for GG didn't help either - massive bloke at CHF was icing both ankles by half time, ruckman was injured not long after, then as was his replacement #3 Daniels. Few more changes next week I'd say choccies. #5 was easily best for you, read the ball at the contest very well and got plenty of it.
by Johno6 » Mon May 16, 2011 3:53 pm
by hollywood7477 » Mon May 16, 2011 4:25 pm
SATCHEL wrote:Because thats where my car was parked dickhead, what door did you want me to go out. Im flattered that you took so much notice of what door i left by, what colour underwear did i have on??? see your still a bonehead satchell. Short memory you have, its people like you who have no idea about why people left but make stupid statements how players abandoned that club and take cheap shots which shows your total lack of respect for players that were at the Portland football club and help formed the very culture to which your very players experience today. I'm pretty sure some of us gave enough blood sweat and tears for that club and achieved a great deal in a short time something you have no idea about. Fact is I love going back to that club, some of my best football memories I experienced at that club and felch is right water has gone under the bridge and most people have moved on except obviously you satchell!!!! If you want a history lesson on the club satchell come see me some time and a few of us will tell you bout the very first game the club played, or the Russell Evans era, the Brendan Klaebe, Gavin Crack situation, the first premiership, the luge, the club song, cocktail nights, players shows, footy trips, the old iggies game down by 54 points at quarter time and come back and win, and the list goes on and on.
On the game, It was a good game played hard and tough which is what was expected when these two clubs meet. Portalnd kicking to their club end in the last quarter with their tails up is always hard to stop. They controlled the midfield they controlled the game, Bird was great all game but exceptional in the last quarter, reminded me of another guy who wore the number 5 at that club a long long time ago.
by Sturtman » Mon May 16, 2011 4:33 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:SATCHEL wrote:Because thats where my car was parked dickhead, what door did you want me to go out. Im flattered that you took so much notice of what door i left by, what colour underwear did i have on??? see your still a bonehead satchell. Short memory you have, its people like you who have no idea about why people left but make stupid statements how players abandoned that club and take cheap shots which shows your total lack of respect for players that were at the Portland football club and help formed the very culture to which your very players experience today. I'm pretty sure some of us gave enough blood sweat and tears for that club and achieved a great deal in a short time something you have no idea about. Fact is I love going back to that club, some of my best football memories I experienced at that club and felch is right water has gone under the bridge and most people have moved on except obviously you satchell!!!! If you want a history lesson on the club satchell come see me some time and a few of us will tell you bout the very first game the club played, or the Russell Evans era, the Brendan Klaebe, Gavin Crack situation, the first premiership, the luge, the club song, cocktail nights, players shows, footy trips, the old iggies game down by 54 points at quarter time and come back and win, and the list goes on and on.
On the game, It was a good game played hard and tough which is what was expected when these two clubs meet. Portalnd kicking to their club end in the last quarter with their tails up is always hard to stop. They controlled the midfield they controlled the game, Bird was great all game but exceptional in the last quarter, reminded me of another guy who wore the number 5 at that club a long long time ago.
Fair enough its thats how you see it. play on
by SATCHEL » Mon May 16, 2011 4:41 pm
by Johno6 » Mon May 16, 2011 4:53 pm
by Choccies » Mon May 16, 2011 4:57 pm
HawkieRanger wrote:Choccies wrote:Mitcham too good for us on the weekend but the scoreboard probably doesn't reflect the better effort from us with around 9 changes to the A's this week. Mitcham romped home with 8 goals in the last quarter but we tried hard all day. Missing a few set shots early probably didn't help us gather any momentum but I think we were alot better than the scoreboard showed. A good, hard at it team are Mitcham, in both the A's and B's and both games played in pretty good spirit. They just had a bit more class and consistency around the ground in the end. Hoping that we build on what we showed yesterday when we take on Pooraka in a triple header on Saturday.
First half was a pretty a close contest, we only came in a goal up at half time. GG flooded our forward line which really kept them in the game, as our use going forward was poor and we continually hit their players. Second half was a different story, we came out and took complete control of the game, kicking away in the end to win by 10 +. A few injuries for GG didn't help either - massive bloke at CHF was icing both ankles by half time, ruckman was injured not long after, then as was his replacement #3 Daniels. Few more changes next week I'd say choccies. #5 was easily best for you, read the ball at the contest very well and got plenty of it.
by Hefty » Mon May 16, 2011 5:01 pm
Choccies wrote:HawkieRanger wrote:Choccies wrote:Mitcham too good for us on the weekend but the scoreboard probably doesn't reflect the better effort from us with around 9 changes to the A's this week. Mitcham romped home with 8 goals in the last quarter but we tried hard all day. Missing a few set shots early probably didn't help us gather any momentum but I think we were alot better than the scoreboard showed. A good, hard at it team are Mitcham, in both the A's and B's and both games played in pretty good spirit. They just had a bit more class and consistency around the ground in the end. Hoping that we build on what we showed yesterday when we take on Pooraka in a triple header on Saturday.
First half was a pretty a close contest, we only came in a goal up at half time. GG flooded our forward line which really kept them in the game, as our use going forward was poor and we continually hit their players. Second half was a different story, we came out and took complete control of the game, kicking away in the end to win by 10 +. A few injuries for GG didn't help either - massive bloke at CHF was icing both ankles by half time, ruckman was injured not long after, then as was his replacement #3 Daniels. Few more changes next week I'd say choccies. #5 was easily best for you, read the ball at the contest very well and got plenty of it.
Nup you got it pretty spot on there HR.... After half time your 2 blondies in the midfield did what they wanted and in the end we had a B grader in the ruck !! And I mean literally !! He was pulled from the B's at quarter time when one of the A graders finally decided he was going to work on Saturday....But injuries are no excuse. You guys were just too polished for us. Hopefully we can get a couple back cos having 9 changes in my B grade team isn't overly handy !! But the guys we had out on the park had a red hot crack I thought and hopefully we can build on that this week against Pooraka in a charity game to raise money for Breast Cancer.
by Choccies » Mon May 16, 2011 5:05 pm
by Choccies » Mon May 16, 2011 5:07 pm
by hollywood7477 » Mon May 16, 2011 5:11 pm
SATCHEL wrote:So Satchel just thought I'd ask What have you accomplished at Portland? Have you captained an A grade flag, coached Portlands A grade, played in the SAAFL rep side, won numerous A grade B&f's. You maybe quick to stick the boot into Marshall and everyone is entitled to an opinion but really he's done alot for the Portland Fc that people are quick to forget when they leave for a rival club.
by SATCHEL » Mon May 16, 2011 5:21 pm
by Sturtman » Mon May 16, 2011 5:24 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:SATCHEL wrote:So Satchel just thought I'd ask What have you accomplished at Portland? Have you captained an A grade flag, coached Portlands A grade, played in the SAAFL rep side, won numerous A grade B&f's. You maybe quick to stick the boot into Marshall and everyone is entitled to an opinion but really he's done alot for the Portland Fc that people are quick to forget when they leave for a rival club.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Do you dry him off after he has a shower up there as well Hollywood? Wow. Or is it due to the fact taht Its someone from Portland is having something to say and you ahte Portland becuase of that big piece of wood we have over for example the flag
by SATCHEL » Mon May 16, 2011 5:29 pm
by hollywood7477 » Mon May 16, 2011 5:33 pm
SATCHEL wrote:Dole Cheque. s that all you guys east of the city can come back with. Typical. Its a shame as i know a few Mitcham lads but they are not all a w nka like you. I think we should move on from your man crush like Sturtman said. I'd rather talk about something interesting than you love for another like you really.
by Choccies » Mon May 16, 2011 5:35 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:SATCHEL wrote:Dole Cheque. s that all you guys east of the city can come back with. Typical. Its a shame as i know a few Mitcham lads but they are not all a w nka like you. I think we should move on from your man crush like Sturtman said. I'd rather talk about something interesting than you love for another like you really.
Ud know what a w nker is you look at one everyday in the mirror.
Good win the the a's bs and cs on Saturday. Thought both a's and bs were played in fantastic spirit. Disappointed number 2 didn't buy a raffle ticket in the last qtr while sitting at ff. He did have a laugh though. A few b grade fellas did say the gg were abit to nice out on the field. Gg will get better as the year goes on and I wouldn't think they would be relegated if they get the 9 players they were missing back in the team
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |