Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Talk on the national game

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby cripple » Wed May 11, 2011 8:18 pm

cripple wrote:The melbourne players response on twitter is getting a fair airing at the moment on AFL 360. Rightly so far no one agree's with the 3 weeks.


Not sure if i should quote myself but Mark Robinson has just said that Trengove should have got a week for what he did. Did clarify it by stating that is only because you have to follow the letter of the law. Also made an interesting point that former demons captain james mcdonald was one of the three wise monkeys on the match review panel who handed down the initial decision
cripple
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Mexico
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby stan » Wed May 11, 2011 8:46 pm

cripple wrote:
cripple wrote:The melbourne players response on twitter is getting a fair airing at the moment on AFL 360. Rightly so far no one agree's with the 3 weeks.


Not sure if i should quote myself but Mark Robinson has just said that Trengove should have got a week for what he did. Did clarify it by stating that is only because you have to follow the letter of the law. Also made an interesting point that former demons captain james mcdonald was one of the three wise monkeys on the match review panel who handed down the initial decision


Yeah ex players on the review panel will raise some eyebrows at time. Seriously regardless it seems a bit harsh compare to what some players have gotten off for in the past. Oh well, young jack said he will just have to move on. Good on him has a good attitude about him. Just a bit unlucky.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15440
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1310 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Dirko » Wed May 11, 2011 8:48 pm

It's crazy. I'm sure it's been pointed out, but how many tackles lead to ACL / Ankle / Collorbone injuries etc which see players careers put on hold for weeks/months.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed May 11, 2011 9:37 pm

I love the fact Trengove tackled Dangerfield and Smith in about 4 seconds of each other, and put them both down.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Aerie » Wed May 11, 2011 10:46 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:I love the fact Trengove tackled Dangerfield and Smith in about 4 seconds of each other, and put them both down.


He's lucky he didn't get a week for the Smith tackle.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5739
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 583 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby MatteeG » Thu May 12, 2011 2:35 pm

Its time for people to get rid of these muppets ru (i?)nning the game. Anderson, and fatman Demetriou the first to go. Get rid of the current tribunal system, get rid of the rules committee. Get rid of the 'fixture' and get back to a fair draw.

The only problem is how do these blokes get these positions, and who hires/fires them?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 519 times
Been liked: 510 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby whufc » Thu May 12, 2011 2:35 pm

Trengove would be one very very very confused footballer!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28550
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5907 times
Been liked: 2818 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby RoosterMarty » Thu May 12, 2011 5:47 pm

Dangerfield is free to play this week so it makes the penalty even more ridiculous.
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby stan » Thu May 12, 2011 6:13 pm

whufc wrote:Trengove would be one very very very confused footballer!


Yeh he'll come back and then get dropped after a few weeks because he didnt go hard enough in some contests or tackles, just wait it will probably happen.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15440
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1310 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Q. » Thu May 12, 2011 6:27 pm

Appeal hearing starts in a couple of minutes.

Apparently megalomaniac Dimwitriou has banned reporters from making twitter updates on the hearing.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby wycbloods » Thu May 12, 2011 6:28 pm

Quichey wrote:Appeal hearing starts in a couple of minutes.

Apparently megalomaniac Dimwitriou has banned reporters from making twitter updates on the hearing.


Yes what has happend to free speech in this country.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby cennals05 » Thu May 12, 2011 6:32 pm

cennals05
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 248 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby cennals05 » Thu May 12, 2011 6:46 pm

Comment from the live updates of the appeal...

Adam McNicol: Not looking good for Jack at this stage.
cennals05
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 248 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby hottie » Thu May 12, 2011 6:55 pm

Unfortunately it doesnt matter the rules and laws of the way the tribunal are set and its not a matter of personal opinion anymore,but i thought in the past before the current points system took place decisions were strange in some cases.
hottie
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:18 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Callington

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby cennals05 » Thu May 12, 2011 7:09 pm

Trengove will miss 3 games....

Adam McNicol: Jack Trengove will miss the next three matches.

Absolute joke!
cennals05
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 248 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby locky801 » Thu May 12, 2011 7:21 pm

It's the way these clowns from the AFL want it to go, sit down and read the 100 odd pages of the AFL future strategies plan, within 8 years football will be a non contact sport whilst these muffets are running the show.

If Trengrove still gets games for this, any side that plays our Juniors this week will win easy because the instruction may as well be dont tackle.

Where to next, cant take a contested mark FFS
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 58655
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4393 times
Been liked: 1419 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby gadj1976 » Thu May 12, 2011 8:27 pm

I was listening to SEN on the way home tonight and they said that David Galbally went in to the appeals tribunal with the belief that he'd get off because of his previous good record.

He argued that Trengove had never been reported, and because he is only 19 isn't able to obtain the 5 years of good behaviour that others more senior are able to obtain, hence his punishment was too severe.

The appeals tribunal weren't impressed by his case and let him know so.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9261
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 800 times
Been liked: 870 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby JK » Thu May 12, 2011 8:37 pm

I know the bodies are supposedly independent, but I think both the MRC and Tribunal would have felt like idiots if this had been overturned after the sensational attention it's attracted, so short of handing over a suitcase with millions of $$ (which lets face it is the only language the AFL speak), poor young Jack was never going to get off.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby JK » Thu May 12, 2011 8:37 pm

I know the bodies are supposedly independent, but I think both the MRC and Tribunal would have felt like idiots if this had been overturned after the sensational attention it's attracted, so short of handing over a suitcase with millions of $$ (which lets face it is the only language the AFL speak), poor young Jack was never going to get off.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Aerie » Thu May 12, 2011 9:21 pm

The points system used by the tribunal I think has generally worked well. But surely there's still a case for common sense and there is no way Trengove should have got 3 weeks (or any weeks) for that. Reminds me a bit of the Greg Williams suspension however many years ago for touching the umpire. Sacrificing the player to make an example.

If they're consistent with this, we'll see a report every week for a hard tackle.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5739
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 583 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |