Reasons to Vote "NO"

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Hondo » Mon May 02, 2011 11:39 pm

The G has been used for non-footy big events during the week in footy season but anyway .... all that old arguing is pointless now
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby spell_check » Mon May 02, 2011 11:40 pm

SJABC wrote:
dedja wrote:Labor are now going faaark, we have to come up with the dough :lol:


More like Labor are now hiking up our taxes to pay for it....


When the SE forest industry is sold off, we know where we can point to. Same goes for the closure of the Keith hospital.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Jim05 » Mon May 02, 2011 11:44 pm

dedja wrote:give it a rest Heater, you're clutching at straws mate ... let's spend a billion dollars to build another stadium to accomodate an AC/DC concert :roll:

No its better to spend 600 mill for 16,000 fair weather power supporters :D
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48332
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3838 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Jim05 » Mon May 02, 2011 11:45 pm

The correct decision was made but will be very ironic if all this work is done and Adelaide goes back to a 1 team town when the power get shipped off. They are kidding if they think this will save them
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48332
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3838 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Mon May 02, 2011 11:46 pm

Ill guarantee -

> There will be massive overruns and there will be arguments who funds it
> Either the Northern End will be filled in or a new stadium will be built within 20 years
> the drop in pitches will fail for the first few years
> Cricket will be a massive loser with footy dominating the SMA

At least we get our $$$ back!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46207
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2635 times
Been liked: 4298 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Hondo » Mon May 02, 2011 11:47 pm

Thanks Captain Optimism :roll:

I thought you said you would support this project if the YES vote got up?
Last edited by Hondo on Mon May 02, 2011 11:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Mon May 02, 2011 11:48 pm

AFLflyer wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Greg Howe spoke very well on 5AA this morning, very impressive.

Key point was he will respect the Yes vote if it gets up and he expects the SACA/SANFL/SMA/Government to do the same if it doesnt.


I hope Howey sticks by this and rejoins his day job!!
somehow i think we havent heard the last of this debate! i hope its all over!!!


What do you mean about rejoin his day job? :?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46207
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2635 times
Been liked: 4298 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Mon May 02, 2011 11:49 pm

Hondo wrote:Thanks Captain Optimism :roll:

I thought you said you would support this project if the YES vote got up?


Actually your right, maybe they will forget to pay us back our building levy.... :lol:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46207
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2635 times
Been liked: 4298 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Q. » Mon May 02, 2011 11:49 pm

Dutchy wrote:> the drop in pitches will fail for the first few years


Les Burdett has stated that there will be no issue with drop-in pitches and for some reason I'm inclined to believe him.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Hondo » Mon May 02, 2011 11:50 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Hondo wrote:Thanks Captain Optimism :roll:

I thought you said you would support this project if the YES vote got up?


Actually your right, maybe they will forget to pay us back our building levy.... :lol:


:lol:

Pretty good comeback, I'll pay that
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Hondo » Mon May 02, 2011 11:55 pm

Quichey wrote:
Dutchy wrote:> the drop in pitches will fail for the first few years


Les Burdett has stated that there will be no issue with drop-in pitches and for some reason I'm inclined to believe him.


That was Greg Howe's early number 1 issue until Les stole his thunder

For some reason after that Greg turned to other issues that then became his main issue (insert sarcasm emoticon here). I think by today he was down to Heater's "we can't afford it" argument.

I think he will be relieved it's all over TBH so he can get back to a normal life.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby BenchedEagle » Mon May 02, 2011 11:59 pm

heater31 wrote:
duncs wrote:Commin sense prevails, So Fu%$ off all you backwards No voters, hand in your memberships on the way out, ill have one :)



Its not common sense it is a step backwards as now we only have one major venue as opposed to 2 in every other mainland capital city

Its people like you that hold this state back. Dont like it get on ya bike and go to Hobart
User avatar
BenchedEagle
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2816
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:05 pm
Has liked: 63 times
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby dedja » Tue May 03, 2011 12:01 am

Is Greg Howe a Rob Gerard Liberal patsy or is he just delusional?
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24290
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 766 times
Been liked: 1689 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby the joker » Tue May 03, 2011 12:02 am

Now it's through, they want to have a showdown round 1 2014. It's about 55 months away. So I wonder when the redevelopment will start
I love vegatarian food. It goes great with steak.
User avatar
the joker
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4687
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Tue May 03, 2011 12:02 am

Amazing how some who havent been on this thread are all of a sudden all over it...
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46207
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2635 times
Been liked: 4298 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby dedja » Tue May 03, 2011 12:03 am

That's so Hondo can't get a word in ... ;)
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24290
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 766 times
Been liked: 1689 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Tue May 03, 2011 12:09 am

Am I right that the Labor will have to get the Libs support for this to proceed?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46207
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2635 times
Been liked: 4298 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby dedja » Tue May 03, 2011 12:11 am

Let it go Dutchy ... :lol:
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24290
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 766 times
Been liked: 1689 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby woodublieve12 » Tue May 03, 2011 12:12 am

awesome news...
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17729
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3124 times
Been liked: 2518 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Ecky » Tue May 03, 2011 12:12 am

As I said earlier, it will be interesting to bump this thread in 5-10 years time and see which predictions have come true.

In a funny way, those of us who voted no are the winners as

:arrow: If it all goes according to plan, we will be happy as we get our cheaper memberships, the heritage of the ground is (largely) preserved, and our cricket clubs will supposedly get all this funding.

:arrow: If it doesn't go according to plan, we will have a clear conscience from the way we voted and others will have to concede that our fears were justified. We will just have to work harder then to save the scoreboard or whatever it is that SACA haven't kept their promises on.

So I'm not overly disappointed and you won't hear any more grumbles from me (until when/if it all falls over or SACA break their promises, which I really hope they won't!). Hopefully all the scrutiny over this will make sure everything is done properly and as promised.

Good luck SACA/SMA/SANFL/Government/AFL, you will need it as there are still a lot of hurdles to overcome before it all works!
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
User avatar
Ecky
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:26 am
Location: Wherever the stats are
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 78 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |