by RoosterMarty » Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:55 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:17 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:26 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:31 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:3/104 22 overs Ferguson 24 Lehmann 4
Only the Redbacks could lose the game from here
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:33 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:10 pm
by RoosterMarty » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:39 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:09 pm
by spell_check » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:22 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Boof got out caught behind then Adcock made a golden duck. Ferguson is playing very well though, hes 63.
5/186
25 off 57 to win
by mal » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:53 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:02 pm
mal wrote:ELLIOTT another contribution AGAIN
DIZZY brilliant AGAIN
BOOF contributes AGAIN
FERGY sensational just needs one big score to be very good.
R HARRIS + CLEARY since these 2 allrounders joined forces this o/d
team has been in form winning last 3 games.
R HARRIS 3/49 and a few runs when the pressure was on is a good o/d player
The 2 dissapointments MANOU who under pressure played some bad shots
the last 10 balls he faced.
BOOF for this absurd inFATuation in bowling COSGROVE AGAIN
I would make 2 changes in the 2 pura cup games left
FERGUSON or CULLEN or CLEARY in ELLIOTT out
BUT we all know that wont happen.
CLEARY for R HARRIS as well
by mal » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:13 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:32 pm
mal wrote:HARRIS is an allrounder in district cricket where hes made heeps of
runs and taken heeps of wickets
Number 9 is a tailenders spot, but his batting is worthy of a number 7.
Ive seen him in 3 PRESSURE situations get us thru in close games with the bat
That 6 v QL earlier this year where we needed a 6 last ball.
And another game recently
And tonight under pressure did well with the bat.
He made 61* batting at 9 in a pura cup game.
If he bats 9 we can never expect him to fully develope his batting.
BUT he is only a good o/d bowler so far in the o/d games
His bowling in the p/cup has been ordinary
As for DIZZY in the WI not a bad thought he has clearly been an outstanding
o/d bowler this year.
CLARK first however
by MightyEagles » Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:30 am
by RustyCage » Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:25 pm
rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:HARRIS is an allrounder in district cricket where hes made heeps of
runs and taken heeps of wickets
Number 9 is a tailenders spot, but his batting is worthy of a number 7.
Ive seen him in 3 PRESSURE situations get us thru in close games with the bat
That 6 v QL earlier this year where we needed a 6 last ball.
And another game recently
And tonight under pressure did well with the bat.
He made 61* batting at 9 in a pura cup game.
If he bats 9 we can never expect him to fully develope his batting.
BUT he is only a good o/d bowler so far in the o/d games
His bowling in the p/cup has been ordinary
As for DIZZY in the WI not a bad thought he has clearly been an outstanding
o/d bowler this year.
CLARK first however
I don't disagree mal. I think R. Harris is an alrounder and will be handy at state level but i was just making the point that the commentators looked at his record and made the point that he is a genuine tail ender. Same way they thought Watson was a decent bowler and you pointed that out the other day. Both sets of commentators made mistakes.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |